The Protesters: Useful Idiots

CxKyuQLUUAAzVfQ.jpg
Ha, or maybe she just didn't understand what happened, a la the USC cheerleader.
 
Last edited:
This series is Matt Harrigan, CEO of Packetsled (a start-up)

First came -- “I’m going to kill the president-elect.”

Then, after his friends pointed out the possible illegality of his threats, he wrote, "Bring, it secret service.”

After another attempt to intervene from friends, Harrigan wrote -- “Nope. Getting a sniper rifle and perching myself where it counts. Find a bedroom in the white house [sic] that suits you [expletive deleted]. I’ll find you.”


SbRGIkgf9HhGwSLngnV3gaJCYU5exD5UJJNQ6-sc_wI.png
 
This series is Matt Harrigan, CEO of Packetsled (a start-up)

First came -- “I’m going to kill the president-elect.”

Then, after his friends pointed out the possible illegality of his threats, he wrote, "Bring, it secret service.”

After another attempt to intervene from friends, Harrigan wrote -- “Nope. Getting a sniper rifle and perching myself where it counts. Find a bedroom in the white house [sic] that suits you [expletive deleted]. I’ll find you.”


SbRGIkgf9HhGwSLngnV3gaJCYU5exD5UJJNQ6-sc_wI.png
No words.

Is this guy not locked up? Is it not a crime to do this as it would be against the sitting president?
 
(3). if there really are Nazis or neo-Nazis out there today as you guys maintain, they are on the left.

Stop trolling, Joe. You know full-well that I'm not talking about the economic system that Hitler advocated, and I'm not talking about violence generally. I'm talking about that pesky little Aryan-purity thing. You know, the thing our greatest generation devoted everything to stop.

The folks in modern-day America who support that ideology (admittedly fewer in number than there are in modern-day Europe) are amongst Donald Trump's most devoted supporters. If you want to know who they are, look through Trump's Twitter feed.

(1) I say there is no such thing. To the extent they do exist, it is only in the mind. Give me an example of where they exist (and you may NOT use "the movies!")

Please, please tell me you are kidding.
 
(1) I say there is no such thing. To the extent they do exist, it is only in the mind. Give me an example of where they exist (and you may NOT use "the movies!")

They're politically insignificant, but to suggest they don't exist at all is absurd. We'll start with the National Socialist Movement political party. Link.

(2) Liberals always conveniently forget the Nazis were socialists. Hitler himself was a proud socialist.

(3) So, if there really are Nazis or neo-Nazis out there today as you guys maintain, they are on the left. As far as I can see, the closest thing that exists today in the US are the current pro-Hillary protestors -- they are the bullies who do violence and threaten violence and the only ones willing to suppress the rights of others extrajudicially.

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/hitler-and-the-socialist-dream-1186455.html

Whose rhetoric does this most closely match?
You+serious+the+economic+policies+_e78bc83ceab724351c57496bc43dd845.jpg

Liberals do forget that Hitler was a socialist, but you forget that Hitler a staunch nationalist as well. You also forget that Trump didn't run on economic libertarianism like Republican nominees usually do. He ran on economic and social nationalism.

I'm not suggesting that Trump is a Nazi. Neither candidate was, and if we're talking about radicals like Nazis and Communists, their favor for both parties would be pretty tepid. However, if you put a gun to a Nazi's head and told him he had to vote for Trump or Clinton, I don't think there's any question that he or she would vote for Trump. And people like Stalin and Lenin (communists or described another way, "international socialists") would support Clinton.
 
They're politically insignificant, but to suggest they don't exist at all is absurd. We'll start with the National Socialist Movement political party. Link.

So, to the extent the mythical modern-Nazi does exist, they exist only on the left?
Is that what you mean to say?

My first thought and the example I thought you might use was the former Govt of Ukraine, which some people analogized to Nazis. But that was not really accurate. (not to mention, look what happened when Obama/Clinton/Soros got them out of there!!!)

Liberals do forget that Hitler was a socialist, but you forget that Hitler a staunch nationalist as well. You also forget that Trump didn't run on economic libertarianism like Republican nominees usually do. He ran on economic and social nationalism......

I have always wondered what you anti-nationalists do during the Olympics.
Do you hide under the bed until its over?
And the World Cup must bring you guys to suicide ....
 
Last edited:
Of course, the the literal opposite happened
It's often amusing when reality finally confronts the liberal imagination

from Oct \/
CxMswsYWQAAFysT.jpg
 
Last edited:
According to Zero Hedge, these buses were for anti-Trump protestors
5 blocks worth of buses -- who paid for that? somebody paid
"In this case, Chicago" (go figure)(for location confirmation, can see the Sears tower)
Was shot Saturday
Watch it, that's alot of dang buses

 
Last edited:



Tanden was a Hillary senior advisor and President of the "Center for American Progress"
CxMfjqlXUAEFwuu.jpg

What's funny about the "Republicans obstructed Obama for 8 years, well..it's payback time," is that Republicans, especially after the 2014 mid-terms, were voted in by the people to do just that. If Obama coalition voters cared enough to come out during mid-terms, it might have been a different story. That's democracy. As Obama said, elections have consequences.

Resist all you want, but the Republicans control all branches of government. The Democrats held both houses of Congress and the White House not that long ago.

Maybe these Democrats should rethink their view on the World?
 
But you keep saying some countries do not grant citizenship to a child born in another country.

Actually, I'm not saying that at all.

Do you truly think there are large numbers of illegals who come here,meet and have Children?

What you define as "large" is a matter of opinion, but it's not unusual. I've known several.

Is the question whether a child is better off with what we hope are loving parents or in a foster care System?

Loving parents are going to be better than foster care. That's really not much of a question.

As far as them going back to economic hardship many legal citizens face economic hardship here. We can not ease every hardship in the world.

Again with the strawman about easing every hardship in the world. The point isn't to guarantee that the children don't face economic hardship. The point is to let US citizen children who have done no wrong at least have a meaningful opportunity to overcome economic hardship without having to give up their parents. You're shuckin' and jivin' around that as much as you can, but it's an inescapable issue.

We separate children from parents going to prison. Should we just let the convicted parent go so the innocent child does not suffer?

Of course not. From a moral standpoint, we're talking about a balancing of interests. The interest in protecting the public from convicted felons (the type of people who go to jail) outweighs the child's interest in living with his parents, especially considering that if those parents are convicted felons, most likely they aren't model parents anyway. We're talking about parents who aren't convicted felons and aren't a danger to anyone.
 
Mr D
You posted more than once that some countries do not grant citizenship to children born to citizens if that country if the child is born in the USA
So perhaps I did not include all the verbal in my statement but I am pretty sure you knew my point
In case you did not
Can you name those countries that do not grant dual citizenship to children born in USA to citizens of those countries?
 
So, to the extent the mythical modern-Nazi does exist, they exist only on the left?
Is that what you mean to say?

No, not at all.

My first thought and the example I thought you might use was the former Govt of Ukraine, which some people analogized to Nazis. But that was not really accurate. (not to mention, look what happened when Obama/Clinton/Soros got them out of there!!!)

I figured you were looking for neo-Nazis in the US, so I left out Europe and found some in the US. They certainly exist in small but not insignificant numbers in Europe. To be clear, the charge that the European nationalist parties that are resisting the EU are neo-Nazi is garbage. UKIP, Alternative for Germany, Freedom Party of Austria, etc. are not neo-Nazi. However (for example), the much smaller National Democratic Party of Germany has gotten into a real trouble for ties to neo-Nazism, and it has dropped several hints. It can't be explicit about it, because Germany doesn't have free speech to advocate Nazism.

I have always wondered what you anti-nationalists do during the Olympics.
Do you hide under the bed until its over?
And the World Cup must bring you guys to suicide ....

Since I'm a nationalist, I can't speak for what anti-nationalists do during the Olympics. Personally, I don't watch the Olympics, because it's too globalist and politically correct, and I don't watch the World Cup, because I don't care about soccer.
 
Mr D
You posted more than once that some countries do not grant citizenship to children born to citizens if that country if the child is born in the USA

No, I didn't. What I've said is that whether the child can go to the country of his or her parents' origin is dependent on that country's laws. We have no control over it. I've also mentioned that not all countries permit dual citizenship.

Can you name those countries that do not grant dual citizenship to children born in USA to citizens of those countries?

I don't know for sure, but according to this immigration law firm, Mexico does not allow dual citizenship.

Nevertheless, you're still shuckin' and jivin'.
 
I looked at several sources including Wiki
Mexico does allow dual citizenship according to other sites.
And just from memory living in Texas I thought so
Exactly though we the USA have no control over what another country does just like we have no control over a parent ' s choice to take their own children with them if they go back to their native country .
No straw man. It should not be our role or financial responsibility to rear chidren left behind by their parents. Let us not pretend this is not exactly what the illegals are counting on,either that we assume the responsibility or we in the name of giving them economic opportunity allow the illegal parent to stay.
Does anyone remember the guidelines of immigration for the past hundred or so years? The same guidelines most countries imcluding Mexico have. That any immigrant not be a drain on the country.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top