Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we can safely answer that question in the affirmative.Just 11 years ago
![]()
Maybe they are just pulling a Fox News and only putting out stuff its audience likes to hear. If you don't like the bullcrap (and I don't) kinda have to ignore FOX, MSNBC, CNN and the rest of them. Fortunately, reading is a much more efficient method of news intake.How do they not see the problem? How do they not understand why their trust from so many in this country has disappeared?
Wall-to-wall coverage by CNN of the Stormy Daniels story, continuously lambasting the president for his sexual behavior and pushing the narrative story for no apparent reason other than the tawdry details - particularly considering that there appears to have been no effort to investigate the one claim that she made which would have a bearing on Trump's presidency.
And today, there's this:
How do they not see the problem? How do they not understand why their trust from so many in this country has disappeared?
LOL! Sinclair media.
John Oliver's take:
Maybe they are just pulling a Fox News and only putting out stuff its audience likes to hear. If you don't like the bullcrap (and I don't) kinda have to ignore FOX, MSNBC, CNN and the rest of them. Fortunately, reading is a much more efficient method of news intake.
I think there are plenty of context clues in written media to identify opinion and attribution is more direct and abundant.To be fair, when it comes to politics most of the written media isn't dramatically less biased than the video media. Is the New York Times fairer than MSNBC? Maybe, but it's not a blowout.
So now I've actually heard the message (and not the officially approved outrage points), and my question would be what about the message was objectionable? Or is the issue that various news casters were all reading the same script from the same source? Because that's pretty much what happens every day in broadcast news rooms - the only difference being that the wire service is the entity that writes the script.
If CNN had read this script, I suspect the response would have been very different.
And having heard more of the track record from Sinclair, I can definitely see issues with how they've handled things in the past. So I'm definitely not saying that they're faultless in any of this.
The WAPO's motto is "Democracy Dies in Darkness"
Should this paper, sometimes called "The Jeff Bezos Blog," be forced to register as a foreign lobbyist?
![]()
required her to “lie — even in legal proceedings or under oath — if any evidence becomes public, by calling evidence ‘counterfeit’ or ‘forgeries.’”
We could call him a nice counter balance to the libs that ran wild with unnecessary regulation when they held that office.Kudos to Foxnews for this interview of Scott Pruitt. They asked some tough questions. Pruitt's responses were flimsy but credit is due to the interviewer. Pruitt was in the pocket of the energy industry as AG and this latest fracas is merely a another demonstration of how far he's intertwined with big energy, unless the EPA has changed their mission statement to match the Energy department (this is possible under Pruitt's leadership).
We could call him a nice counter balance to the libs that ran wild with unnecessary regulation when they held that office.
Counterbalance akin to the Patriots signing Johny Manziel to be a counterbalance to Tom Brady in every way.
Anyone remember Bill O'Reilly? A judge just denied his attempt to keep his sexual harassment settlements sealed. Evidently one plaintiff's lawyer switched from working for her to Bill O'Reilly in one case. At least one settlement...