2022 House and Senate election
- Thread starter mchammer
- Start date
He said it was a big mistake and called O'Dea stupid, a RINO, and a big mouth. That kind of **** right before an election is dumb and selfish. He's saying this because O'Dea distances himself from Trump. Well, O'Dea is running in a state of Trump lost by almost 14 points. He can't be cozy with him and win the election.
What's comical is that these same goofballs have spent the last two years saying how awful it is to question the legitimacy of an election, and now that they're about to lose a significant amount of power in an election, they're laying the groundwork to question its legitimacy.
I'm hearing a lot about the "democracy is in danger" whining recently. They can't run on Biden's record, because it's ****. They thought the Dobbs decision would make a big impact, but the big infanticide lovers already vote Democratic, and the party is running on radicalism on abortion, which voters don't like. That weakens how big of an issue they can make of it. So they're trying to make January 6 and "democracy" the big issue at the last minute. It's just not going to work.
For starters, even if they don't have doubts themselves, people just don't think it's a big danger to the country to express doubts about how clean an election was. Furthermore, after doing it in pretty much every election in which they've lost in the last 22 years, the Democrats don't have the credibility to raise this issue anyway, and they sound dishonest and self-serving doing it. The disingenuous sanctimony just isn't flying, and it looks like a diversion from the fact that the Democrats are OK with 8 percent inflation and drag queens throwing their dicks in little kids' faces.
To build their case that this is different, they're trying to make a big issue out of January 6 and trying to smear everybody in the GOP with it. The problem is that the people running weren't storming the Capitol, and they weren't cheering on those who were. Did some of them question the results? Yes, but they weren't openly sympathetic with the Capitol rioters. And again, Democrats don't have the credibility to raise that anyway, because they spent the entire summer of 2020 sympathizing with rioters.
Honestly, rather than play this game, all they really had to do was not be crazy. Biden could have governed as the moderate he was elected to be. Don't make the stupid Dark Brandon speech. Prosecute the January 6 rioters, but don't try to make it a major political issue. Don't needlessly piss away huge amounts of money and make inflation worse. I understand not building the wall, but don't act like nothing's wrong on the border. At least try. Condemn the Dobbs decision, but don't push extremism on abortion. Don't cozy up to drag queens and freaks. That's beneath the presidency. Don't push the racist "equity agenda." Basically, govern like Bill Clinton did after 1994. If he had, the GOP may still take the House, but we'd have no chance of flipping the Senate, which means he'd still get judicial confirmations and be able to force the GOP to compromise more on any legislation.
For starters, even if they don't have doubts themselves, people just don't think it's a big danger to the country to express doubts about how clean an election was. Furthermore, after doing it in pretty much every election in which they've lost in the last 22 years, the Democrats don't have the credibility to raise this issue anyway, and they sound dishonest and self-serving doing it. The disingenuous sanctimony just isn't flying, and it looks like a diversion from the fact that the Democrats are OK with 8 percent inflation and drag queens throwing their dicks in little kids' faces.
To build their case that this is different, they're trying to make a big issue out of January 6 and trying to smear everybody in the GOP with it. The problem is that the people running weren't storming the Capitol, and they weren't cheering on those who were. Did some of them question the results? Yes, but they weren't openly sympathetic with the Capitol rioters. And again, Democrats don't have the credibility to raise that anyway, because they spent the entire summer of 2020 sympathizing with rioters.
Honestly, rather than play this game, all they really had to do was not be crazy. Biden could have governed as the moderate he was elected to be. Don't make the stupid Dark Brandon speech. Prosecute the January 6 rioters, but don't try to make it a major political issue. Don't needlessly piss away huge amounts of money and make inflation worse. I understand not building the wall, but don't act like nothing's wrong on the border. At least try. Condemn the Dobbs decision, but don't push extremism on abortion. Don't cozy up to drag queens and freaks. That's beneath the presidency. Don't push the racist "equity agenda." Basically, govern like Bill Clinton did after 1994. If he had, the GOP may still take the House, but we'd have no chance of flipping the Senate, which means he'd still get judicial confirmations and be able to force the GOP to compromise more on any legislation.
Last edited:
I didn't click the tweet, so all I saw was the part about it being a big mistake.
Unfortunately for the Dems, the loudest voices - the ones getting the media attention - all come from the far-left fringe weirdos. And Joe, not the strongest leader, gets pulled to the left to try to keep peace within the Party - and thus he gets to carry the banner of the craziness of the far left.
Nah...not just a spike. It would be the full-on taunting penalty
I think the over-the-top media bias is starting to be a disadvantage, because the media largely cheers for the nuttiest elements of the Democratic base and their craziest policies. They aren't impressed with sensible people or adopting mainstream liberal positions. They're impressed with people like AOC, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, etc.
They don't like safe, legal, and rare or a generally pro-choice position on abortion with some common sense restrictions like late-term, parental notification, etc. They only like radical reproductive "justice" (no restrictions at all and taxpayer-funded abortion). They aren't satisfied with gay marriage. They want drag queens swinging their dicks in little kids' faces and big dudes competing in women's sports and showering in their locker rooms. They aren't satisfied with holding bad police officers accountable. They want to defund the police.
So they celebrate that crap throughout media and push it on Democratic voters, so the party feels the need to cozy up to it or at least take it seriously. At a minimum, they make it extremely hard for any Democrat to draw the line or distance himself from it. That leaves them totally out of touch with basically anyone who isn't a godless, urban progressive. They don't know how normal humans think or how to communicate with them. For even remotely competent Republican politicians, they're very easy to attack.
The intersectional idiocy hurts them too. If they get a racial minority or female candidate, they can't look at them objectively. They have to pretend they're great. That's how garbage candidates like Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris become prominent Democrats.
Excellent point, Mr. Deez. The remaining moderate Dems are being pounded by the mass media and the far-left message - and the message is so far left that the moderate Dem is beginning to look more like a RINO.
Duck Dodgers
1,000+ Posts
The brain dead carrot Fetterman had perhaps the worst debate performance in modern history tonight.
He acted exactly like what he is - a brain dead zombie.
He acted exactly like what he is - a brain dead zombie.
Duck Dodgers
1,000+ Posts
It’s PA which means the Philly Fraud Machine can add a few percentage points, illegally, to the vote totals. But after the zombie’s performance tonight, I think this one is out of reach even for the Democrat party.
Duck Dodgers
1,000+ Posts
Horn2RunAgain
2,500+ Posts
Watched the fetterwoman Oz debate just now. Not even a yellow dog would vote D on this one. That was the definition of an embarrassing performance. Oz otoh, came across better than I expected. Much better. I don't see Oz getting beat here
Anybody else get the feeling that Fetterman doesn't actually want to do this anymore but that his selfish ***** of a wife won't let him quit?
I'm honestly starting to feel bad for him. He undoubtedly knows how bad his condition is, and now he's becoming a public laughing stock. His disability is all anyone is talking about. I have a hard time believing that he really wants to try to do this. Pre-stroke? Sure. But now? Very hard to believe.
I'm honestly starting to feel bad for him. He undoubtedly knows how bad his condition is, and now he's becoming a public laughing stock. His disability is all anyone is talking about. I have a hard time believing that he really wants to try to do this. Pre-stroke? Sure. But now? Very hard to believe.
Last edited:
Horn2RunAgain
2,500+ Posts
I disagree simply because he attacked Oz as "a liar". Even in the closing statement, where each candidate is supposed to be silent during the other's delivery, Fetterman blurted out "liar". If he didn't want to continue this charade he'd follow the Clayton Williams advice of Just Lay Back And Enjoy It. Yet there he was hanging on for dear life, reaching for straws. Desperate
It amazes me Fetterman is even on a ballot. He's not capable of most positions in life, yet he's actually leading in polls
It amazes me Fetterman is even on a ballot. He's not capable of most positions in life, yet he's actually leading in polls
Recent Threads
-
President Biden Accountability Thread
- Started by 2003TexasGrad
- Replies: 4K
- West Mall
-
H1-B's
- Started by BrntOrngStmpeDe
- Replies: 2
- West Mall
-
The Media Industry
- Started by texas_ex2000
- Replies: 8K
- West Mall
-
Post Right Wing looniness here
- Started by Seattle Husker
- Replies: 1K
- West Mall
-
The Affordable Housing Debate in Austin
- Started by AustinBadger
- Replies: 73
- West Mall
Prediction Results Threads
