I’m thinking Yorkman was on Ferris-wheel with Bevo voodoo doll.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you’re saying, “we have a chance!”Thanks for agreeing with me that we have a chance
do you know what the word AND means. Like in both have to be true. So no, I'm not agreeing with you and you're just being obtuse. Or is that too big a word for you. OU does not need to be in the top 3 when we meet them for us to go to the CFP. Good lord. today's sucked bad enough without having to deal with your BS.Thanks for agreeing with me that we have a chance
ABSOLUTELY! That was the killer today.Failing to get a td from inside the one is not acceptable anytime when you have 4 downs.
There were a number of killers. Kind of like “death from a dozen cuts.”ABSOLUTELY! That was the killer today.
Agree all three share some of the blame. But QE was 32-38 and really 2 of those turnovers are on him. Sanders had already dropped the ball before he got hit. Only the first one lead to points. Sark at the goal line was terrible, but he also had some great play calls that kept us in the game early and I do credit QE going 32-38 partially on Sark. The D though was just mediocre to bad all game long. By their standards just bad. 1 barely sack (-1 yds), no turnovers (one easy dropped pick), very little pressure. Just nobody made the important plays.Wadster,The defense was bad and did not play well but QE had 2 interceptions and a fimble. Sark calls three plays up the middle on the 1 yard line. What happened to the wildcat. Loss was on the defense,QE and Sark.
I went to the walking track at Freedom Park and did 6 miles to work off the adrenaline and rage. Now I’m looking forward to an evening with Gin & Tonic, and some Chardonnay.Now I gotta do some yoga to get my heart rate down. (No booze, surprisingly.)
I think there’s an argument to be made, not an excuse, that OU was humiliated last year and was frequently reminded of it this week. That kind of thing is about pride and can be enough to create the winning edge in effort, intensity, etc in a close game. Just a dumb fan theory.I really dont like the worn out cliche of one team is more motivated than the other. Those are comments made by losers. I never played any kind of game that I didnt want to win. I have to believe kids getting to play college ball are the same. It doesnt matter if its checkers, show up to win.
You’re mad cause we agree? loldo you know what the word AND means. Like in both have to be true. So no, I'm not agreeing with you and you're just being obtuse. Or is that too big a word for you. OU does not need to be in the top 3 when we meet them for us to go to the CFP. Good lord. today's sucked bad enough without having to deal with your BS.
Off day? Not sure the DB’s are all that goiod.My takeaway is OU spent more time analyzing our weaknesses and exploited them. They also had the motivation of last year’s 49-0 loss to us. The real signal we were not going to win was the inability of our O line to open a hole to score from the okie 1 yard line on 4 tries. Our DBs also had an off day, to put it nicely. We had some good moments, but not enough.
Our best CB and safety were out injured. Definitely hurt us.Off day? Not sure the DB’s are all that goiod.