Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AND it is amazing that there are so many teams including Rutgers, that have zero games over 4 million despite playing big names. The ramifications of what a far inferior team can do to a superior product are telling.Nash,
I, for one, discount the chart because each game has two participants. A&M gets credit for Alabama being the big draw. Bottom feeders in the BigTen get credit for people watching the princes of polyester. I also discount the 11 AM kickoffs since half the country (geographically, not population) isn't ready that early.
Also, are those real viewers or a result Delany's "****** you again" TV numbers. Remember, Delany pulled off a contract based on the number of TVs in the area not viewers. He took Rutgers because the contract then gave him credit for ALL of NYC even though 75%+ of those people couldn't tell you the schools mascot is or where it is located. Same reason he took UMd to get credit for DC/Baltimore area TVs
I totally agree. Blue had a unfortunate fumble his first year that set him back but when his opportunity came again this year he was lightening in a bottle both running and receiving. He is the star of that group in my humble opinion. Baxter is work horse but does not seem to have the speed that defenses fear and Blue does. If he stays focused this year, he will set himself up for a huge payday in the nfl and also make Texas a scary run team to defend.
Sark is leagues ahead in my book.I never cease to be impressed by Sark’s press conferences. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a coach as steady, compelling and consistent with his message, and handle questions as well as Steve Sarkisian. Which raises this question:
Given a choice of any college or professional head coach around these days, is there anyone you would choose over Sark? I cannot think of one.
* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC