Prosecuting Rittenhouse Is Completely Unjust

Hollandtx said:
I have read that their are people stationed at the courthouse, taking photos of the jurors. I have also read that this same group has somehow identified the name and address of each juror.

That would definitely make me think long and hard before rendering a verdict.
I hope that I would be brave enough to do the right thing.
Click to expand...

I'll be perfectly honest. I'd have no problem rendering my judgment based on facts. I'd have no issues facing people harassing me or my property. None at all.

No soapbox here, but no one is going to intimidate me in regards to my rights or freedom. I'd hope everyone else would do the same. No reason for drama, just stand up for yourself in a calm manner
 
UTChE96 said:
Wow, there goes the remaining shreds of the Left wing medias narrative.
Click to expand...
While I agree, they will just go after this kid like Sandman. Do we think they learned their lesson? Doubt it. The Z-list people like Kathy Griffin will still say heinous things about him.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
The judge said it was legal for him to carry.

Click to expand...



Here's the reason:

"The defense, according to the Associated Press, argued that Wisconsin’s statute had an exception that could be read to clear Rittenhouse. That exception involves whether or not a rifle or shotgun is short-barreled.
After prosecutors conceded in court Monday that Rittenhouse’s rifle was not short-barreled, Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the charge."
 
This is not from the Bee
Prosecuting Dude has finger on trigger aimed at jury
FEQbt0FX0AQr1Zw.jpg
 
Prosecution actually stated that your rights to defend yourself end when you bring a gun somewhere.

In other words, they are seriously claiming that you can only use a weapon in self-defense if you don't take that weapon with you to have it available to use in self-defense. They are really desperately stretching for anything here.
 
Garmel said:
The judge said it was legal for him to carry.

Click to expand...

I didn't see that one coming.

I figured he'd walk on everything but the weapons charge, and get community service or something like that for illegally possessing his firearm in Wisconsin...

I guess he'll likely walk on everything. However, juries have been known to make some strange calls, from time-to-time...

The State never should have brought this case. A real political show trial or something...
 
The Prosecution case, statements, and actions are VERY bizarre.

To the point where It seems getting a guilty verdict is not the objective. The whole shitshow seems to be more in line with a exercise to see how far our justice system can be ignored, and replaced with new age wokeism in the US Court of Law.

Michael Yon gets it right, not in regards to this case. But more to the paradigm. Don’t be surprised by how stupid or inept the prosecution case presentation seems to be. But rather see it for what it is. An experiment in how far one can extend their new woke social justice - complete with full disregard for the truth and or facts - introduce concepts, and thoughts in an attempt to influence a jury into a mindset that allows for a new “social” justice system.
 
OUBubba said:
Is the prosecutor stepping in his pecker on purpose?
Click to expand...

I've heard of stepping on one's pecker but not in it. It would take a pretty wide urethra to do that. Is that some maneuver that guys from Oklahoma learn to do?

It wouldn't surprise me. Some people in cultures in Africa (and some hipsters) gradually stretch their ears. I guess Oklahomans gradually stretch their urethras. Seems like that would hurt, but I guess if you're really bored . . .
 
Last edited:
Mr. Deez said:
I've heard of stepping on one's pecker but not in it. It would take a pretty wide urethra to do that. Is that some maneuver that guys from Oklahoma learn to do?

It wouldn't surprise me. Some people cultures in Africa (and some hipsters) gradually stretch their ears. I guess Oklahomans gradually stretch their urethras. Seems like that would hurt, but I guess if you're really bored . . .
Click to expand...
It serves a very functional purpose too. It provides a good meth hiding place when you are being patted down by the cops.
 
OUBubba said:
Is the prosecutor stepping in his pecker on purpose?
Click to expand...

I saw a video last night where he said when you carry a weapon into a riot or protest you lose your right to self defense. This guy is a nit wit to the 1000th degree. I can't believe this is a serious trial.
 
Even with the prosecutor being a nitwit there is still no guarantee that Rittenhouse will walk. It should be an open and shut case but in modern America it isn't.
 
Mr. Deez said:
He's auditioning to get a MSNBC show.
Click to expand...
So, I think what someone above was asking maybe was... is it possible this prosecutor only brought this to trial under pressure and now is doing things that will bring a Not Guilty verdict but not cause him to be disbarred? Or is it debarred? Or unbarred?

Whatever.
 
It's sad that Rittenhouse has to spend tens of thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) on legal fees to defend such an absurd charge. This may be the motivation behind the case. Punish him with debt even if he does not get prison time. Sad that the judge didn't dismiss this ridiculous case outright.
 
UTChE96 said:
It's sad that Rittenhouse has to spend tens of thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) on legal fees to defend such an absurd charge. This may be the motivation behind the case. Punish him with debt even if he does not get prison time. Sad that the judge didn't dismiss this ridiculous case outright.
Click to expand...

I think he'll make out well when he starts suing the MSM for the disinformation they put out.
 
OUBubba said:
Is the prosecutor stepping in his pecker on purpose?
Click to expand...
Quite possibly. I believe Binger hopes that if this case went away via mistrial, the feds could come collect the files and proceed on a civil rights claim, not unlike we saw in LA during Rodney King. Civilians don't often get prosecuted under those sorts of federal law, but it isn't unheard of...
 
UTChE96 said:
It's sad that Rittenhouse has to spend tens of thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) on legal fees to defend such an absurd charge. This may be the motivation behind the case. Punish him with debt even if he does not get prison time. Sad that the judge didn't dismiss this ridiculous case outright.
Click to expand...
Judges tend to be loathe to impose their judgment over that of a jury, which is why you will see appellate holdings where the Court of Appeals concedes that they might have found differently, but they refuse to impose their judgment over that of the presumed rational jury.

HOWEVER...in this case, we ALSO have the still unruled-upon Motion for Mistrial that Schroeder has in his back pocket if the jury did something stupid.
 
Garmel said:
I think he'll make out well when he starts suing the MSM for the disinformation they put out.
Click to expand...
I saw a tweet from Ben & Jerrys this morning that STILL pushes the BS narratives, including that he crossed State lines with the "illegal gun," which clearly ignores that 1) KR didn't cross the border with a gun and 2) the judge kicked the weapons charge, which negates the 'illegal gun' claim.

The dismissal of the gun charge is ALSO why I believe Binger pivoted back to the narrative of 'scary weapon' and 'full metal jacket...scary military grade' and pointing the 'assault rifle' at the jury. Never mind that it isn't scary and that you can, in theory, go into any Academy and get just about any caliber of ammo in a FMJ design. And he hopes that the jury thinks the A in AR means 'assault.'
 
mb227 said:
I saw a tweet from Ben & Jerrys this morning that STILL pushes the BS narratives, including that he crossed State lines with the "illegal gun," which clearly ignores that 1) KR didn't cross the border with a gun and 2) the judge kicked the weapons charge, which negates the 'illegal gun' claim.

The dismissal of the gun charge is ALSO why I believe Binger pivoted back to the narrative of 'scary weapon' and 'full metal jacket...scary military grade' and pointing the 'assault rifle' at the jury. Never mind that it isn't scary and that you can, in theory, go into any Academy and get just about any caliber of ammo in a FMJ design. And he hopes that the jury thinks the A in AR means 'assault.'
Click to expand...
Those ******** ought to stick to trying to actually make a good product. How did they become so popular?
 
So how did he not cross state lines with the gun?

He went to play army. One of the people he shot was an actual trained medic who had his gun out because he was responding to shots as a “good guy with a gun”. Good guy v good guy, I guess?
 
OUBubba said:
So how did he not cross state lines with the gun?

He went to play army. One of the people he shot was an actual trained medic who had his gun out because he was responding to shots as a “good guy with a gun”. Good guy v good guy, I guess?
Click to expand...

Tell me you have not paid attention to ANY of the testimony without saying so.

One has to HAVE the fun in possession in order to CROSS A STATE LINE with it. Testimony CONFIRMED the gun never crossed a State line in his possession. He got it WHILE in Wisconsin.

Oh and that 'medic' with a gun that he shot, was drawing down on him after feigning a surrender. Lefty's own words corroborated THAT (and also sent Lefty's $10M suit circling the toilet).

I guess you believe he allowed himself to be photographed prior to that evening doing good things because he planned to go shoot people.

People like you are sickening because it seems you would rather an unarmed Kyle Rittenhouse now be dead as opposed to a lawfully-armed KR having defended himself. And how do we know it was lawful possession? Because the gun charge (like the curfew allegation) were dismissed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top