My point, back about one page ago, was that the student at Boise State did not call the police; I was not referring to the student at Baylor.
Both Boise State and Baylor are attempting to claim a lack of responsibility here.
Boise State says they apprised Baylor, they informed Baylor, blah, blah, blah, but they will not say exactly of what they informed Baylor.
Baylor says they only knew the player was depressed, and could harm himself, blah, blah, blah.
Neither school wants liability from the victim who could claim that either Boise did not properly inform Baylor, or Baylor knew and allowed a predator to roam its campus.
Maybe one of the two institutions would be liable in a big civil lawsuit, but which one?
Florida's Will Muschamp says he was told about the player and refused to recruit him to Florida, by a Boise State employee. But Muschamp's offensive coordinator left Florida for Boise State a year earlier, so it could be that Muschamp was warned by this insider, but Baylor was not. It could be that Boise wanted to wash their hands of this guy and figured that they would pawn him off on a school which had no desire to look into his background since he was such a good player, a school located in Waco, Texas.
Both schools may have covered their asses legally, but they both are smelling like a dead skunk in the middle of the road right about now.
