I am appalled to learn that the Waco Tribune Herald, which back in the day I followed state newspapers had a reputation for good journalism, has fallen so far.
It's inconceivable to me that the crime reporter would ignore ANY indictment for rape in a community as small as Waco, much less that of a heralded football prospect.
To me lack of coverage makes me wonder if:
1. The Waco paper is so clueless and inept to not know the indictment happened? ( When I worked for newspapers, we grabbed the list of indictments as soon as they were issued and no one got indicted without getting his/her name in the paper.)
2. Tribune-Herald reporters and news editors had such poor news judgment they did not see the story as newsworthy.
3. The paper is afraid of Briles and Baylor.
4. The paper is in bed with Briles and Baylor.
5. The paper really thought the perp was innocent and did all it could to protect his reputation.
It's inconceivable to me that the crime reporter would ignore ANY indictment for rape in a community as small as Waco, much less that of a heralded football prospect.
To me lack of coverage makes me wonder if:
1. The Waco paper is so clueless and inept to not know the indictment happened? ( When I worked for newspapers, we grabbed the list of indictments as soon as they were issued and no one got indicted without getting his/her name in the paper.)
2. Tribune-Herald reporters and news editors had such poor news judgment they did not see the story as newsworthy.
3. The paper is afraid of Briles and Baylor.
4. The paper is in bed with Briles and Baylor.
5. The paper really thought the perp was innocent and did all it could to protect his reputation.
Last edited: