Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not true. Jury made no determination on that.
Mr D
Do You think Trump did that?
I don't believe he did no wrong, but E. Jean Carroll's case does not even rise to the preponderance of credible evidence standard if one looks at the case without political bias.I think her case is a joke on the evidence, but would I bet the house on his innocence? Well, he was a notorious philanderer who banged porn actresses and bragged about grabbing women by their genitals. A lot of people aren't going to make that bet, and of course, most people are never going to look at the evidence as we have. They're going to hear about the verdict, compare it with the Billy Bush tape, and presume guilt.
Let's put it this way. If you're having to expend time and resources on stuff like this, you're losing.
I don't believe he did no wrong, but E. Jean Carroll's case does not even rise to the preponderance of credible evidence standard if one looks at the case without political bias.
And, simply put, I don't believe her.
The fact that the "rape" mirrors a Law and Order (one of Carroll's favorite shows) episode with the exact same details (same store, dressing room) is mind boggling to how this is allowed to happen.
The Hispanics that came through legally want nothing to do with the illegals or those who are helping them. This is Cuellar's problem and the reason he tries to side with the Repubs. when this issue comes up. That is good, but then he is solid lib on all other issues which is a backdoor try at keeping his job.
Obviously you can't disallow cases just because a TV show had a similar fact pattern.
Maybe not but what are the odds of it being the exact same store (Bergdorf) and in a dressing room? That is just too much of an astronomical coincidence.
I could dismiss that coincidence if there was verifiable and clearly independent evidence - surveillance video, police report of the incident, etc. Instead she really had nothing but her own testimony and the testimony of 2 friends (one of whom is a retired journalist and almost surely a Trump hater) who claimed Carroll told them about the rape.
Btw, you know the store even in the 90's had surveillance video. Was it destroyed because of time? If not there should be a video of the incident.
She was obviously asking for it by taking off her clothes. Come on man!That actually doesn't shock me too much. When authorities aren't contacted and nothing is reported to staff, stores don't typically keep surveillance video around indefinitely. And for obvious reasons, they don't typically put them in dressing rooms. If they did, I'm sure you'd be in a thriving second career as a security camera monitor. Lol
That actually doesn't shock me too much. When authorities aren't contacted and nothing is reported to staff, stores don't typically keep surveillance video around indefinitely. And for obvious reasons, they don't typically put them in dressing rooms. If they did, I'm sure you'd be in a thriving second career as a security camera monitor. Lol
Not gonna argue with passionate posters unencumbered by logic.^^^And cheat their sorry asses off, just like they did in 2020. That is also how they beat Trump. It's really the only way because liberalism and any democrat candidate are both diseases. Anyone thinking otherwise is really not a serious person, to quote a former slugging poster.
Good!Il
Not gonna argue with passionate posters unencumbered by logic.
Yep. For all the smoke, no fire. Just a lot af wacky unproven claims from folks who would be happy to let Trump seize the ballots and then tell us who should have won.Croc
You don't think think there was election cheating in 2020?
Srsly?
* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC