2022 Recruiting - Football

Who wouldn’t want more Justin Blalocks or Jerry Sizemore on this team? But anybody who can accurately judge a staff’s recruiting skills by 4 kids in year one is missing out on huge money. Oughta be getting paid for it somewhere. This isn’t about Herman anymore. Enough of the bashing. A recruit sees that as systemic uncertainty (hows that for millennial speak?) and attaches a risk premium to playing there. I know this. DKR was as sound as the US dollar. Not so aTm or SMU or TCU. Kids want to know: we’ll have a scheme long enough to learn it and I’ll have a coach who can teach ME. For 4 years. We had Willie Zapalac and Mike Campbell. Nobody worried. One other thing. Kids 6’5” 300# in HS are almost never challenged sufficiently. Most are human road-graders. Technique suffers among even the most diligent when they can ‘bam-bam’ through most everybody.
Check out the Wisconsin ‘scholarship distribution’ for a little lesson in OL. They have 15 OL scholie’s. ONE 5* freshman, a couple of 4’s and 12 or so 3*. I’ll take any bet that they’ll have a top 3 OL unit this year, next, and the one after that. They have had that for a decade at least. Find Potential (good footwork, balance, reverse speed, side step and cross-over) put quality weight on them and teach them to play as a UNIT and you’re ‘sconsin’. A lot of great HS OL prospects have never played unit football. Almost none. Who has 2 or 3 great OL on one team? The state champion maybe.
Chill out on the instant success nipple and invest a little time to let Flood prove his ability. We’ve got enough ‘potential’ already at the stadium. Don’t be so fast to bash. Kids know Internet by 3rd grade. Where to be for 4 years is by far the biggest decision any of them have ever made and the smart ones are scared to death. Don’t give them good reason to be scared of UT.
 
I am not smart enough to know whether the following theory is correct or not … but …

A long time coach from the power 5, now retired, always said that what scared him the most was not the recruits that got away, it was mis-evaluating the recruits you got … 5* Garret Gilbert and Chris Simms come to mind
 
I am not smart enough to know whether the following theory is correct or not … but …

A long time coach from the power 5, now retired, always said that what scared him the most was not the recruits that got away, it was mis-evaluating the recruits you got … 5* Garret Gilbert and Chris Simms come to mind
:arrow-up:

Or as former Longhorn coach Abe Lemons said:
"Doctors bury their mistakes, mine are still on scholarship"
 
Ok, looks like we have 14 recruits so that leaves 11 to go. (but perhaps a couple xtra?)
I know we covet these 5:
Devon Campbell
Denver Harris
Bryce Anderson
Derrick Brown
Evan Stewart
We have a good chance with these 5. So who else would we not mind taking?
Brenen Thompson -that would be good
Harold Perkins- that would be great!
Seb. Cheeks- very good
E. Green- not likely but would be great.
J. Finkley- not likely but would be nice
Kevin coleman
CJ Williams
Did Jaray Bledsoe recently commit?
I would take any of these.
This is a solid list.
Of course if we have a very good season someone that's committed elsewhere might change their minds.
 
Last edited:
Ok, looks like we have 14 recruits so that leaves 11 to go. (but perhaps a couple xtra?)
I know we covet these 5:
Devon Campbell
Denver Harris
Bruce Anderson
Derrick Brown
Evan Stewart
We have a good chance with these 5. So who else would we not mind taking?
Brenen Thompson -that would be good
Harold Perkins- that would be great!
Seb. Cheeks- very good
E. Green- not likely but would be great.
J. Finkley- not likely but would be nice
Kevin coleman
CJ Williams
Larry Turner-Gooden
Did Jaray Bledsoe recently commit?
I would take any of these.
This is a solid list.
Of course if we have a very good season someone that's committed elsewhere might change their minds.
Larry Turner-Goodman gave verbal to AZ St.
 
Which of these do you think would help our cause the most?

Devon Campbell OL
Denver Harris. CB
Harold Perkins. LB
Evan Stewart. WR
 
Which of these do you think would help our cause the most?

Devon Campbell OL
Denver Harris. CB
Harold Perkins. LB
Evan Stewart. WR
IMO, Campbell and Harris. Not that familiar with Perkins. I have a feeling that Stewart will prove to be more trouble than he's worth.
 
Skill players first (WR and DB), OL 2nd, and who cares about LB (ducks for cover).
Well yes skill players are important but we need maulers on the line. We already have (plenty?) of skill players. But then again Stewart is a chain moving difference maker. Tough one.
 
I was thinking, naive about the subject as I am, what is to stop a booster from offering a great deal of money to sign with a particular team and laundering the money under NIL to the players?
We all know that a booster giving money to a recruit is a big violation.
And while I am at it what is to stop a booster to offer a large amount of money to a recruit with a promise to pay him after he signs a contract in the pros. This could have been happening for decades.
 
I was thinking, naive about the subject as I am, what is to stop a booster from offering a great deal of money to sign with a particular team and laundering the money under NIL to the players?
We all know that a booster giving money to a recruit is a big violation.
And while I am at it what is to stop a booster to offer a large amount of money to a recruit with a promise to pay him after he signs a contract in the pros. This could have been happening for decades.

I've also wondered about that. A booster could buy up every t-shirt they can make for a given player. It clearly gives the rich schools an advantage. People will end up scalping the jersey's too probably.
 
I was thinking, naive about the subject as I am, what is to stop a booster from offering a great deal of money to sign with a particular team and laundering the money under NIL to the players?
We all know that a booster giving money to a recruit is a big violation.
And while I am at it what is to stop a booster to offer a large amount of money to a recruit with a promise to pay him after he signs a contract in the pros. This could have been happening for decades.
Why on other threads others have posted, "college sports as we know it is over". The NCAA won't even be able to track legal endorsements, much less all the illegal stuff that will follow.
 
I was thinking, naive about the subject as I am, what is to stop a booster from offering a great deal of money to sign with a particular team and laundering the money under NIL to the players?
We all know that a booster giving money to a recruit is a big violation.
And while I am at it what is to stop a booster to offer a large amount of money to a recruit with a promise to pay him after he signs a contract in the pros. This could have been happening for decades.

For those who do not understand "coach speak", Pompoms is bragging that he has received his Bachelors in "Screwing the NCAA" from A&M and is about to receive his Masters from OU.

:beertoast:
 
For those who do not understand "coach speak", Pompoms is bragging that he has received his Bachelors in "Screwing the NCAA" from A&M and is about to receive his Masters from OU.

:beertoast:
Poms, Sabrehorn is saying that you are more right than you let on.
 
Poms, Sabrehorn is saying that you are more right than you let on.
Oh now that i read it differently, it makes better sense. Its still a little weird to me but I'm not sweating it. Associating me with A&M and OU is not an easy pill to swallow even if its not meant derisively.
Thanks MC
 
Well yes skill players are important but we need maulers on the line. We already have (plenty?) of skill players. But then again Stewart is a chain moving difference maker. Tough one.
Not so tough for me. If you have a dominant O-line, your offense has time to perform. Give a decent QB time and he'll find a receiver. Give a decent RB a bit of a hole, he'll gain some yards. Conversely, if a QB is running for his life it doesn't matter how good he is. If a RB is met behind the line, probably doesn't matter how good his moves are. IMO, a good offense begins with a good line. Without the blocking, the skill players have no room to perform.
 
Not so tough for me. If you have a dominant O-line, your offense has time to perform. Give a decent QB time and he'll find a receiver. Give a decent RB a bit of a hole, he'll gain some yards. Conversely, if a QB is running for his life it doesn't matter how good he is. If a RB is met behind the line, probably doesn't matter how good his moves are. IMO, a good offense begins with a good line. Without the blocking, the skill players have no room to perform.

Plus you keep the other offense on the sideline and allow your defense to remain fresh. It's all good.
 
Not so tough for me. If you have a dominant O-line, your offense has time to perform. Give a decent QB time and he'll find a receiver. Give a decent RB a bit of a hole, he'll gain some yards. Conversely, if a QB is running for his life it doesn't matter how good he is. If a RB is met behind the line, probably doesn't matter how good his moves are. IMO, a good offense begins with a good line. Without the blocking, the skill players have no room to perform.
Creak, while it would be tough to argue against your points, I would contend that over that past 10-15 years, excluding many of the Bama teams, the eventual winner had a transcendent player, usually a QB. In other words, it wasn’t necessary to have a dominant O-Line to win, and win big. A great QB or great running back can make a good O-Line look great. That’s not to say that I don’t want a dominant O-Line, because I do. But again, great players make good ones around them play better.

To an extent, I believe that Bijan Robinson may be the X factor this season. Defenses will have to account for him on every play, and that reality will make our QB, be it CT or HC, look and play better.
 
Creak, while it would be tough to argue against your points, I would contend that over that past 10-15 years, excluding many of the Bama teams, the eventual winner had a transcendent player, usually a QB. In other words, it wasn’t necessary to have a dominant O-Line to win, and win big. A great QB or great running back can make a good O-Line look great. That’s not to say that I don’t want a dominant O-Line, because I do. But again, great players make good ones around them play better.

To an extent, I believe that Bijan Robinson may be the X factor this season. Defenses will have to account for him on every play, and that reality will make our QB, be it CT or HC, look and play better.
Bijan is not superman.
He won't be getting 8.2 yards per carry over 12 games. Him and k Robinson could be a lethal combination.
Its definitely going to have to be a collective effort with good schemes and play calling included.
 
Last edited:
Duke, you'll have to give me an example of a team that won with "just" a transcendent player? I simply can't think of any other than Louisville with Lamar, and they didn't win against the best.

Ricky had a great OL. Vince had a very good OL. Texas hasn't had a really good OL since Colt's JR year and the only way Texas is going to be back the NC picture again is with at least a very good OL. It doesn't have to be a bunch of 5*'s, but there has to be some *** kickers like Casey Studdard and Justin Blalock in the mix.

And that would include the DL too.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top