2020 Senate & House

Duck Dodgers said:
Quite glad about this. Cunningham should be beaten with a tank cheater bar for fooling around with a solider's wife. Fool might have won otherwise.

Between this one, and Collins winning in Maine, the Democrats let two seats slip through their fingers. With those in hand, the Republicans would need to win both GA seats just to have 50, instead of already being there.

Other big losses for them - Iowa, which I never thought was a contest. Montana, where a popular Democrat governor was running against a first term Senator, and various money wasters such as Texas, Kansas, and KY and SC where they bilked their donors of close to 200 mill, to lose by a combined 35 points. So close!
Click to expand...

The fact that Cunningham was acceptable to the Dems as a Senator is another reason why Trump's personal life means nothing to me.
 
Horn6721 said:
Will
Do you doubt there will be Dems who move there for that express purpose?
Or did you just want to be snarky?
Click to expand...
It was more of a snarky comment. You worded it as if Republicans can't move there do to them having jobs. Democrats have jobs also. And if you think that Democrats are the only dirty ones and not Republicans also, we need to talk real estate
 
I have never said Republicans are incapable of tricks. Why try to change the subject? Just to snark?

My post was directed at the call by Dems for people to move to Ga just to vote.
Based on the number of people from out of state able to be part of Antifa/BLM protests for days and weeks with no corresponding protests from the other side it is reasonable to suggests most Repubs have jobs and will not quit just to go protest .
Do you doubt there will be Dems who move there just to vote?
 
Horn6721 said:
I have never said Republicans are incapable of tricks. Why try to change the subject? Just to snark?

My post was directed at the call by Dems for people to move to Ga just to vote.
Based on the number of people from out of state able to be part of Antifa/BLM protests for days and weeks with no corresponding protests from the other side it is reasonable to suggests most Repubs have jobs and will not quit just to go protest .
Do you doubt there will be Dems who move there just to vote?
Click to expand...
wow....just wow....I will refrain from commenting.....
 
Project Lincoln went 0-7 in key Senate races this cycle despite spending ~$12M in support of Dem candidates

But, hey, at least they lined their own pockets!
What a sad bunch of grifters and carnival barkers
 
Minority leader Kevin McCarthy --

"Not one Republican incumbent lost."
​
He says the incoming Rep class will be the most diverse in history, with 29 women and several people of color (most of whom are also women)
 
Max Rose finally conceded to Nicole Malliotakis in NY-11
That was the 10th seat flipped by the good guys
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile, at the state level --

After flipping both legislative chambers in New Hampshire and the state House in Alaska, Republicans look to get through the 2020 cycle with majorities in 61 of the country’s 99 state legislative bodies.

Democrats failed to regain control of a single state legislative body anywhere in the country.

Which is not only great for the future (next session is the one about redistricting) but also adds further questions about the validity of the 2020 presidential election
 
Last edited:
Assuming GA elects the GOP senators, Pocahontas will likely join Biden cabinet, allowing GOP governor to appoint GOP senator. So good chance 53-47 in senate.
 
mchammer said:
Assuming GA elects the GOP senators, Pocahontas will likely join Biden cabinet, allowing GOP governor to appoint GOP senator. So good chance 53-47 in senate.
Click to expand...

Hard to tell. The Fake Indian's name has been bandied around for Treasury Secretary, but not sure if she'll be offered it.

The Democrat party has played a double game for 20 years, of being allegedly for the poor and more recently, socialists, while also becoming the party of the rich. As much money as Wall Street raised for Slow Joe, I'm not sure how excited they'd be to have her as T Sec, or for that matter, how excited she'd be to have to be in that position either. She's played a double game too, and if she got that position she'd be expected to carry out loony socialist goals.

As for the replacement, some states have laws that the Governor has to select from a chosen list of people, from the party the former senator was from (NC is like this I read). MA has bounced between giving the Gov lots of freedom to appoint cronies for favors when a Democrat has been in the seat, to changing it around when there's a Republican in the mansion.

Current Gov is the RINOest of all RINOS, knowing him he'd probably appoint a Democrat even if he didn't have to for political gain and kiss assitry.
 
Okay, GOP could have 215 seats now. Really close in 2-3 races. Let’s say it’s 215 and 2-3 Dems move into Biden administration, 1-2 quit due to other issues (health, scandal, etc.), etc over next 2 years. Further let’s say GOP gains majority in June of 2022 (due to special election). If you were GOP, would you challenge Pelosi as speaker? Seems to me you want her in charge up to Election Day. Haha! My fevered dream at the moment.
 
Joe Fan said:
Meanwhile, at the state level --

After flipping both legislative chambers in New Hampshire and the state House in Alaska, Republicans look to get thought the 2020 cycle with majorities in 61 of the country’s 99 state legislative bodies.

Democrats failed to regain control of a single state legislative body anywhere in the country.

Which is not only great for the future but also adds further questions about the validity of the 2020 presidential election
Click to expand...

What makes it even worse for the communists is that the next sessions will re-draw the congressional lines, based on the 2020 Census, and now that the courts are out of the game, they can fix them to their most possible benefit. Suck it Eric Holder - you failed!
 
Duck Dodgers said:
Hard to tell. The Fake Indian's name has been bandied around for Treasury Secretary, but not sure if she'll be offered it.

The Democrat party has played a double game for 20 years, of being allegedly for the poor and more recently, socialists, while also becoming the party of the rich. As much money as Wall Street raised for Slow Joe, I'm not sure how excited they'd be to have her as T Sec, or for that matter, how excited she'd be to have to be in that position either. She's played a double game too, and if she got that position she'd be expected to carry out loony socialist goals.

As for the replacement, some states have laws that the Governor has to select from a chosen list of people, from the party the former senator was from (NC is like this I read). MA has bounced between giving the Gov lots of freedom to appoint cronies for favors when a Democrat has been in the seat, to changing it around when there's a Republican in the mansion.

Current Gov is the RINOest of all RINOS, knowing him he'd probably appoint a Democrat even if he didn't have to for political gain and kiss assitry.
Click to expand...
Apparently he already said no way on legislative branch trying to force his hand by vetoing any legislation. So I think a Republican is likely in this case.
 
Last edited:
mchammer said:
Okay, GOP could have 215 seats now. Really close in 2-3 races. Let’s say it’s 215 and 2-3 Dems move into Biden administration, 1-2 quit due to other issues (health, scandal, etc.), etc over next 2 years. Further let’s say GOP gains majority in June of 2022 (due to special election). If you were GOP, would you challenge Pelosi as speaker? Seems to me you want her in charge up to Election Day. Haha! My fevered dream at the moment.
Click to expand...

Hell, you'd vote for her, a la what the Democrats do in Texas to ensure a favorable House Speaker (though for them it's to get a wimpy R who will surrender to them).

With 435 seats, there are always 2-5 per session that croak, get other jobs, get bounced out for having sex with their staff while smoking dope, etc. So, if the final election total is very close (don't think it will be - most I'd say would be 212 or so R seats), then conceivably control of the House could swap during the next session. But not likely - most seats are safe, and it's the same 30-40 that are fought over year after year.
 
The Georgia state Constitution would appear to put up a nice roadblock to all those snaky liberals looking to move there for a month just to vote in the runoffs
Tough break for them

Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 2
EmqKiWVXUAIvC3N
 
That makes all the people like Friedman look like the fools they are.
I can't believe how stupid they were to not have researched it.
 
Horn6721 said:
That makes all the people like Friedman look like the fools they are.
I can't believe how stupid they were to not have researched it.
Click to expand...

The same people will argue there is nothing in the GA Const to prevent the dead from voting a second time, or third ....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Back
Top