2020 Presidential Election: let the jockeying commence

Just had a GI issue....its Sept 14th and I just watched the 1st Biden campaign video here in Cleveland........Lord help us
 
Trump Jr. Put together a short summary of Bidens first run for president. I remember it vividly and was sure his political career was over at the time.

 
"Why I am the first man in my family to go to college (university)?", said Biden / Neil Kinnock (sp)

Worst part was, with the entirety of all the great leaders and speakers from the United Kingdom to choose from, Slow Joe picks a minor league dude from Whales? Should have been enough to run him out of office alone.

Also, I believe Slow Joe was caught in a plagiarism scandal during his law school days as well.
 
While we all slept Trump became an environmental scientist....what a relief. I was worried about climate change. I'm so glad Trump has a handle on this...

Trump says "I don't think science knows" about climate


And yes it is MSM not Glenn Beck.
Is he wrong? If "science" did know, then why is there not a consensus on all of this? Science is provable, isn't it? But, they all disagree, so it sounds accurate to say they don't know.
 
Last edited:
Science is the new buzz word for liberals (and I guess Libertarians :confused2:). The science has been wrong on every step of Covid. The fires in California were started by idiots and arsonists from what I have seen on TV. I could be wrong, but I cannot remember a year in my life where forest fires were not an issue in California due to poor forest management, high winds and it is a dry climate.

All parties would be better served in realizing there are correct options on both sides versus summarily dismissing one simply due to party affiliation.
 
Is he wrong? If "science" did know, then why is there not a consensus on all of this? Science is provable, isn't it? But, they all disagree, so it sounds accurate to say they don't know.
It just cracks me up that he likes to way in on what scientists say.
Yes scientists and doctors were making statements in a flowing situation with COVID but they are the professionals. That is the definition of "practicing medicine" Our lawyer friends here do the same thing.
IMO he should make smart comments like " lets figure this out" not "you don't know what your talking about"
He is just like me. He was given a degree from Penn just to get out.
 
Science is the new buzz word for liberals (and I guess Libertarians :confused2:). The science has been wrong on every step of Covid. The fires in California were started by idiots and arsonists from what I have seen on TV. I could be wrong, but I cannot remember a year in my life where forest fires were not an issue in California due to poor forest management, high winds and it is a dry climate.

All parties would be better served in realizing there are correct options on both sides versus summarily dismissing one simply due to party affiliation.
My wife lived in Cali before we were together and she LOVES it....you couldn't pay me $1 billion to live there. I'd much rather go back to Baghdad.
 
It just cracks me up that he likes to way in on what scientists say.
Yes scientists and doctors were making statements in a flowing situation with COVID but they are the professionals. That is the definition of "practicing medicine" Our lawyer friends here do the same thing.
IMO he should make smart comments like " lets figure this out" not "you don't know what your talking about"
He is just like me. He was given a degree from Penn just to get out.
Perhaps, but again, he wasn't incorrect in what he said.
 
Is it his place to make a comment like that?
One of the things I think so many people were and are tired of when he was elected was the "Politics as usual". It is unusual for a politician to speak his mind like he does. But, that's what a lot of people like about him.

If he didn't weigh in on it or said what you suggested, the MSM and left would simply say he doesn't care and doesn't take it seriously. He might as well speak his mind because they will criticize him either way.

You don't like it but many people do.
 
My wife lived in Cali before we were together and she LOVES it....you couldn't pay me $1 billion to live there. I'd much rather go back to Baghdad.
If I could afford it I'd live in Saratoga, Los Gatos or even Woodside. No otehr place in the US I've been combines better weather and beauty. Then there's the sleepy little coastal town of Pescadero on the other side of the mountains that's awesome. You can isolate yourself from the politics and there's actually more conservatives there than you think, they just stay silent.

But you have to be a multimillionaire to live there and own a decent house.
 
One of the things I think so many people were and are tired of when he was elected was the "Politics as usual". It is unusual for a politician to speak his mind like he does. But, that's what a lot of people like about him.

If he didn't weigh in on it or said what you suggested, the MSM and left would simply say he doesn't care and doesn't take it seriously. He might as well speak his mind because they will criticize him either way.

You don't like it but many people do.
Exactly. Some people like to be pandered to and can't "handle the truth". I'll respect someone who tells me to my face they can't stand me more than someone who panders to me to make me feel good. But oversensitive liberals "can't handle the truth" so they certainly aren't going to like Trump.
 
Exactly. Some people like to be pandered to and can't "handle the truth". I'll respect someone who tells me to my face they can't stand me more than someone who panders to me to make me feel good. But oversensitive liberals "can't handle the truth" so they certainly aren't going to like Trump.
I can't stand you. There, I said it. Lol!!! Kidding.

Past presidents and generally all politicians are afraid of the media and want positive press. Trump couldn't give a rat's *** and only candy asses are offended by his tweets. Grow a pair and read past the "boorish" content and read what he is actually getting across.
 
While we all slept Trump became an environmental scientist....what a relief. I was worried about climate change. I'm so glad Trump has a handle on this...

Trump says "I don't think science knows" about climate


And yes it is MSM not Glenn Beck.
The 'science' on the left is still trying to figure out how actual arsonists can be lumped into 'climate change' with a co-morbid condition of failed forestry policies at the State level...
 
The 'science' on the left is still trying to figure out how actual arsonists can be lumped into 'climate change' with a co-morbid condition of failed forestry policies at the State level...
The left concerns itself more with what The Donald says vs. the ******** spewed by the "scientists", who can't agree.

Isn't science provable?
 
I am willing to bet you they already have a plan the 25th Amendment JoeMentia right on out of there. Maybe Comey even wrote it

Kamala Harris actually used the phrase "a Harris administration together with Joe Biden as the president" in public.
 
The new Florida Atlantic University poll shows undecided voters are breaking for Trump by a margin of 4:1
 
Last edited:
Science is the new buzz word for liberals (and I guess Libertarians :confused2:). The science has been wrong on every step of Covid. The fires in California were started by idiots and arsonists from what I have seen on TV. I could be wrong, but I cannot remember a year in my life where forest fires were not an issue in California due to poor forest management, high winds and it is a dry climate.

All parties would be better served in realizing there are correct options on both sides versus summarily dismissing one simply due to party affiliation.


I find it ironic that the "party of science" scientist is 12 years old and in middle school.

OIP.gqbWn-qz7YwY0zakMxsBQAHaEK
 
Last edited:
The 'science' on the left is still trying to figure out how actual arsonists can be lumped into 'climate change' with a co-morbid condition of failed forestry policies at the State level...

The easiest thing is to say that absent climate change, the fuel (kindling, dry grass etc) would have been not as robust. Also, they will blame the black-outs on the need for AC which is because of climate change.

NOTHING they did in the way of policy will be seen as a causal factor.

Trying TO DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING, is to be expected. The downside of this is now more extreme because of climate change. So they behave as usual, according to their political needs and pathological uncompromising idealism, and it is our fault when a misguided policy explodes.
 
The easiest thing is to say that absent climate change, the fuel (kindling, dry grass etc) would have been not as robust.

bystander, I agree with your statement. But I will point out that Climate Alarmists can't say that because they warn that food production will go down with a warmer climate.

This is of course false as we can see around the world. More CO2 means more plant growth not less. Warmer climates means more plant growth not less. There will be some regions where hotter temperatures reduces plant growth, but on net these factors cause plants to grow including food.
 
One of the things I think so many people were and are tired of when he was elected was the "Politics as usual". It is unusual for a politician to speak his mind like he does. But, that's what a lot of people like about him.

If he didn't weigh in on it or said what you suggested, the MSM and left would simply say he doesn't care and doesn't take it seriously. He might as well speak his mind because they will criticize him either way.

You don't like it but many people do.
I think a non politician is GREAT. The status quo hasn't been working for decades. But since he isn't a politician he still needs to choose his words more wisely...
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top