We shall see.I think a non politician is GREAT. The status quo hasn't been working for decades. But since he isn't a politician he still needs to choose his words more wisely...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We shall see.I think a non politician is GREAT. The status quo hasn't been working for decades. But since he isn't a politician he still needs to choose his words more wisely...
OMG.....there are right wingers here (Republicans) that make sense for their POV. You on the other hand.....FAR RIGHTThe 'science' on the left is still trying to figure out how actual arsonists can be lumped into 'climate change' with a co-morbid condition of failed forestry policies at the State level...
LOL that paying attention to the catch-and-release practices of arsonists who THEN GET CAUGHT setting multiple other fires makes me 'far right.'OMG.....there are right wingers here (Republicans) that make sense for their POV. You on the other hand.....FAR RIGHT
LOL that paying attention to the catch-and-release practices of arsonists who THEN GET CAUGHT setting multiple other fires makes me 'far right.'
Also LOL that you view a lesbian as 'far right,' apparently for having dared to voice opinions that are based upon actual facts.
LOL that paying attention to the catch-and-release practices of arsonists who THEN GET CAUGHT setting multiple other fires makes me 'far right.'
Also LOL that you view a lesbian as 'far right,' apparently for having dared to voice opinions that are based upon actual facts.
Well she is more qualified than her predecessor, algore.I find it ironic that the "party of science" scientist is a 12 years old in middle school.
If you say an additional 100 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere causes global warming, then it should follow that the additional CO2 will act as a fire retardant. Both arguments would be BS, but would be consistent.The easiest thing is to say that absent climate change, the fuel (kindling, dry grass etc) would have been not as robust. Also, they will blame the black-outs on the need for AC which is because of climate change.
NOTHING they did in the way of policy will be seen as a causal factor.
Trying TO DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING, is to be expected. The downside of this is now more extreme because of climate change. So they behave as usual, according to their political needs and pathological uncompromising idealism, and it is our fault when a misguided policy explodes.
Well she is more qualified than her predecessor, algore.
Harris indicated that it is really Harris/Biden.Yes he perhaps should watch his words more carefully but weighing that against all he has done good for the country and world
And weighing THAT against the alternative Biden/ Harris prospect how can anyone who cares about our country have a choice?
Knowing the DMC will do and is doing every dirty trick it can how can anyone throw their vote away?
They never do.I guess Anti Trump people don't care.
Why the word "or"? Stupid and full of hate.Wow
That was scripted as was hers
Are Dems this stupid or just full of hate?
Yo quiero Jose Biden
As I keep saying, they are afraid of the media and hope that "this time" they will be nice. Sort of like Homer Simpson here. D'oh!I do not know why the republicans always allow a left leaning journalist to moderate the debates. I say let each candidate pick their journalist.
They're making everybody think that Biden is going to debate, but at the last minute Joe will have to pull out for some yet to be determined reason.
He can barely handle the softballs they're lobbing up to the plate now. No way he can coherently answer tough questions about foreign policy and the economy.
I honestly believe the MSM and even many of the pundits on Fox News will give him a a pass if he backs out.I could possibly see it, but if he pulled out it be the final nail in his coffin. He needs much more enthusiasm to beat DT and that first debate has become more important for him than the typical round one. Any meltdown, he's toast.
He doesn't really need to win the debate, just prove somehow he isn't JoeMentia. I think that's become the goal
A good possibility is Joe ducks out of debates 2,3 if he doesn't look like a complete fool in the eyes of MSM (why risk exposure if debate 1 isn't a complete failure). But if he sidesteps debate 1, it's become "a thing" even on cnn. He really cant afford that
I honestly believe the MSM and even many of the pundits on Fox News will give him a a pass if he backs out.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC