Now we evidence. The DNC was not hacked. People need to go to jail. People at Crowdstrike, people within the DNC, and people who worked for the Clinton campaign.
Story has one big fake news in it: it claims Russian hacked DNC. Also, fails to disclose that misinformation campaign = trolling. This is why Obama didn't do anything until after Hillary lost.
Then why did the President tweet about it? If it were spades, he played that deuce.
You know the answer to your question
Did you see the report that Mueller's lead FBI investigator left the investigation? It's over except the tax charge on Manafort.
You don't think that might have something to do with the ranting/raving of our President at North Korea before this whole KKK thing blew up? His NK stuff was nothing more than an attempt at distraction.
Were you ever supportive of the sadly witch hunty Benghazi investigation that was ON IT'S FACE an effort to hurt Hillary politically? $7,000,000 and counting.
1. I would concur that they played a spade. Trump saw a window open to make a scene to distract.
Chuck C. Johnson has been banned from twitter and facebook multiple times for his deplorable behavior. Every picture of him has him doing the "3 percenter" thing with his hand. He's a troll of the highest order. Kind of fitting that we're down to him being a player.The Lib's typical projecting accusation Russia was responsible for the hack and leaks of the DNC is about to be exposed.
Intel already scrambling to cover their *ss. A reporter from 'The Hill' said one of the intel sources he asked for comment said "we never said Russia was the only one doing hacking".
Sounds like the Congressman who met with Assange hit the mortherload...
Report: GOP Rep. Dana Rohrabacher Meets With Julian Assange, Receives ‘Earth-Shattering’ Information
According to Rohrabacher, Assange “reaffirmed his aggressive denial that the Russians had anything to do with the hacking of the DNC during the election,” in the meeting, adding, “He has given us a lot of information. He said there’s more to come. We don’t have the entire picture yet.”
Rohrabacher further claimed that the information he received would have “an earth-shattering political impact.”
“It wouldn’t be so important if Democrats hadn’t focused so inordinately on the Russians. Democrats are creating a total upheaval over this,” he proclaimed. “I have some information to give the president before I give information to anyone else.”
The meeting was reportedly set up by conservative journalist Charles C. Johnson, who claimed that Rohrabacher “would be the envoy in charge of bringing back a deal to the Trump White House.”
Johnson’s presence was confirmed by a spokesman for Rohrabacher.
The point is you can trust him as much as you can trust Assange when he says "wikileaks had nothing to do with it" or Putin when he says "Russians did not do anything".I have no clue who that dude is but we do know Wiki has a verifiable 100% truthful record. All I'm interested in are the facts and Assange is the main guy who has them.
Who cares how much of a weasel the guy is who connected Assange with a member of Congress to get these facts? If this meeting was legal, what's the problem?
First your side ignored the facts showing collusion in the Wikileaks emails by blaming the nefarious source the leaks supposedly came from.
Now when we're about to learn who really provided the leaks, you discredit the guy who set up the meeting to reveal the truth. Jesus Man.
* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC
