Yes, I am even willing to become lesbian
I can do that now just by imagining it, right?
Somebody better tell NJ. He was having some man love thoughts awhile back (when NJ was just wrong!)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I am even willing to become lesbian
I can do that now just by imagining it, right?
Deez, it's been a long time since I was in France. How "right wing nationalistic" is the Front National? Like compared on the spectrum of Reagan Democrats => Establishment GOP => Texas GOP =>Tea Party => Republic of Texas Separatists => FascistsThat's good, because you wouldn't want to know her affiliation. Lol.
In all seriousness, she's in the Front National, which is the main right wing nationalist party in France - similar to Fraucke's Alternative für Deutschland party but probably even more confrontational.
Republic of Texas Separatists => Fascists
Good point 77. I have a really bad cold and was just typing. I was thinking about their nationalist sentiments more or less in isolation versus preferred governing style.Would a fascist be to the right of a Republic of Texas separatist? I mean, the only things to the right of that would be the feudal system then anarchists.
I think this has been discussed on threads before but it seems if you are further right than the republic of texas people, you would end up with anarchy. Fascists are called "far right" but they seem to be center left extremists. All I am saying is that republic of texas people who are one step shy of wanting no government at all and are all about disunity probably do not have much in common with fascists which did away with states completely in Germany and just had one strong central united government.
Deez, it's been a long time since I was in France. How "right wing nationalistic" is the Front National? Like compared on the spectrum of Reagan Democrats => Establishment GOP => Texas GOP =>Tea Party => Republic of Texas Separatists => Fascists
See article I just posted. It is NOT superficial, just the opposite. Do you just post BS thinking it will stick? Don't get me wrong, I have no strong animosity towards your positions, but your argument style is mostly BS. You make strong comments that are easily disproved.
steve-patterson.com?
Contradicted would have been a better word choice.You either didn't carefully read what I posted, or you don't know what the word "disproved" means. I haven't said anything that can be disproved. Disagreed with? Sure. Disproved? No, and certainly not by a single anecdote.
Nevertheless, I commend you for that anecdote. It's a superb article and not superficial, but I don't think he's making the point you suggest. I don't see him linking Brexit to Trump. I see him linking the progressive reaction to Brexit with the progressive reaction to Trump and how that reaction impacts the politics and motivations of those who support Brexit and impliedly, Trump. That's a separate and more nuanced but (somewhat paradoxically) a bigger issue as well.
of course what most miss out on is the fact that the smart people will have used this as a buying opportunity in some manner and will come out ahead in the end, with accounts that have an even larger balance.
I think there is a lot of truth to what he's saying. The various left and rightwing blogs take the bias to the extremes. They aren't held to the same standards as traditional media. Look at New York Times that are called out for any bias and incorrect information. The blogs? They don't have fact checkers. They don't need them because half baked facts and conspiracy theories are the norm.
Fact checking doesn't seem to stop the mainstream media either. They say it, get called out on it, ignore the fact check........repeat.
Starting to warm up to Boris Johnson --
- Obama: 'ancestral dislike' of UK
- Erdogan: has sex with goat (poem)
- Hillary Clinton: 'sadistic nurse in mental hospital'
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC