Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This morning one of the Fake News Networks had the title "How Sean Spicer lost his credibility."
Granted, Trump would be the most difficult of all Presidents to spin for but its not a desirable job in general. I still remember Clinton's various Press secretaries having to spin answers for the bimbo scandal of the week. You know its bad when your narrative becomes "character doesn't count". Yeah, not a desirable job.Did they have Captain Obvious saying it? Spicer has become a laughing stock chasing the absurdity of Trump's statements.
Granted, Trump would be the most difficult of all Presidents to spin for but its not a desirable job in general. I still remember Clinton's various Press secretaries having to spin answers for the bimbo scandal of the week. You know its bad when your narrative becomes "character doesn't count". Yeah, not a desirable job.
Jewish Israeli-American man arrested in connection to bomb threats against Jewish centers....
Did they have Captain Obvious saying it? Spicer has become a laughing stock chasing the absurdity of Trump's statements.
As usual you (the lib) ignored the point about the irony, not who the CNN FAKE NEWS is reporting about. Trust me, CNN fake news have had their head up their a$$ much more than Spicer has the past year.
"there's more evidence that CNN colluded with Hillary and her campaign than Trump colluded with Russia."
Spicer just nailed CNN gal at the WHPB pretty well, saying --
"there's more evidence that CNN colluded with Hillary and her campaign than Trump colluded with Russia."
Snicker!
The Right is being a bit hypocritical on this Syria attack. I don't remember much conservative support for Obama attacking Syria after the last chemical attack. Not sure why this one is a game changer.
Not really sure I know what to think about this situation, as something about it just doesn't feel right. Maybe I'm getting more suspicious after all that's happened in the past couple of years. Regardless, one difference in the attitude may be that frankly it seemed like it happened so quickly that there wasn't a lot of time to evaluate. There were lots of discussions when Obama brought all this up about "red lines" and whether this meant we were committed to ongoing actions, and what our goal was, and frankly I don't remember nearly as much emphasis on showing the impact of the gas. Maybe I'm not remembering it accurately. Anyway, this seems like a lot of people scrambling after the fact to make sense of it, and it sure seems like it plays into the hands of the neocons who seem to be the ones most supportive of this action. And the Sean Hannitys of the world, obviously.
And then Seattle comes in on the other side. How exactly is he propping up Putin and Assad by bombing Assad? That's just ridiculous on the face of it.
Whether you think Trump made the right decision or not, he was pretty clear that the events changed his position on Assad. That does happen, from time to time, although yes, that would mean he's now doing what at one time he thought was a bad idea.
I'm not convinced it's still not a bad idea. I guess we'll see.