The Media Industry

It is baffling how the media is trying to make it trannies the real victims of the Nashville shooting. Norm McDonald made a great point about this involving a nuclear attack by ISIS.

 
Trans is the latest revolution that Ds are pushing on America. So everything they do or say will be to use trans as a stick to beat the Right. After that? Maybe bestiality. Maybe polyamory. Something to destroy the idea of what is human I'm sure.
 
Monahorns said:
Trans is the latest revolution that Ds are pushing on America. So everything they do or say will be to use trans as a stick to beat the Right. After that? Maybe bestiality. Maybe polyamory. Something to destroy the idea of what is human I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Why not slavery? I'm 3/5 certain there's precedent there.
 
The whole idea is to move completely from the old white boy dominance. Heck watch anything on tv now and you’d think the white race was a distant minority. The whole thing is not an accident. But I do believe the white ultra libs are going to be surprised when the agenda they are pushing turns against them in the end and ejects them from authority.
 
nashhorn said:
Heck watch anything on tv now and you’d think the white race was a distant minority.
Click to expand...

Especially in advertisements. You'd think most of the country wasn't white, and you'd think that most white people were either gay or in interracial marriages.
 
nashhorn said:
But I do believe the white ultra libs are going to be surprised when the agenda they are pushing turns against them in the end and ejects them from authority.
Click to expand...
Nashhorn, I hope you're correct. And we need to see that reversal soon - the longer these ultra-lib idoits are in power, the more damage they can cause (and some of that damage will be irreversible).
 
HornHuskerDad said:
Nashhorn, I hope you're correct. And we need to see that reversal soon - the longer these ultra-lib idoits are in power, the more damage they can cause (and some of that damage will be irreversible).
Click to expand...
I think a lot of irreversible damage has already been done.
 
HornHuskerDad said:
Nashhorn, I hope you're correct. And we need to see that reversal soon - the longer these ultra-lib idoits are in power, the more damage they can cause (and some of that damage will be irreversible).
Click to expand...
this reversal is not going to happen until/unless someone develops a conservative oriented TV channel. Not conservative in the "700 club" way but conservative in the "Growing Pains", "Cosby Show" way. Something that demonstrates family values without constantly referencing John 3:16.

The Dem's figured out a long time ago that the long game in this country is played by indoctrinating youth. Their primary mechanisms for doing this are Hollywood and schools. We have recently become much more aware of schools, but we are still leaving a significant channel almost exclusively to Dem's to dictate content. Somehow, we have got to take the airwaves back so that youth are not getting their "norms" from the Dem side of the spectrum. think about that disaster of a show "RuPaul".... even now that thing only has 1.3 million viewers. It was a bomb in its first several seasons and yet i can't count the number of advertisements i see on other channels for the show. Someone is taking a massive financial loss on that show just so they can continue to bombard the airwaves with trans crap. This is how they "normalize" trans to our kids. Our kids see "RuPaul" ads on TV over and over and now this becomes "normal".
 
BrntOrngStmpeDe said:
this reversal is not going to happen until/unless someone develops a conservative oriented TV channel. Not conservative in the "700 club" way but conservative in the "Growing Pains", "Cosby Show" way. Something that demonstrates family values without constantly referencing John 3:16.

The Dem's figured out a long time ago that the long game in this country is played by indoctrinating youth. Their primary mechanisms for doing this are Hollywood and schools. We have recently become much more aware of schools, but we are still leaving a significant channel almost exclusively to Dem's to dictate content. Somehow, we have got to take the airwaves back so that youth are not getting their "norms" from the Dem side of the spectrum. think about that disaster of a show "RuPaul".... even now that thing only has 1.3 million viewers. It was a bomb in its first several seasons and yet i can't count the number of advertisements i see on other channels for the show. Someone is taking a massive financial loss on that show just so they can continue to bombard the airwaves with trans crap. This is how they "normalize" trans to our kids. Our kids see "RuPaul" ads on TV over and over and now this becomes "normal".
Click to expand...
Yep, and so many kids are impressionable enough to think something is wrong with then if they don't want to be trans because of the prevalence of it on TV and in movies.
 
You hit it ‘hornin’. Kids are always wanting to ‘fit in’ no matter how much they say they want to be different.
 
BrntOrngStmpeDe said:
The Dem's figured out a long time ago that the long game in this country is played by indoctrinating youth. Their primary mechanisms for doing this are Hollywood and schools. We have recently become much more aware of schools, but we are still leaving a significant channel almost exclusively to Dem's to dictate content. Somehow, we have got to take the airwaves back so that youth are not getting their "norms" from the Dem side of the spectrum. think about that disaster of a show "RuPaul".... even now that thing only has 1.3 million viewers. It was a bomb in its first several seasons and yet i can't count the number of advertisements i see on other channels for the show. Someone is taking a massive financial loss on that show just so they can continue to bombard the airwaves with trans crap. This is how they "normalize" trans to our kids. Our kids see "RuPaul" ads on TV over and over and now this becomes "normal".
Click to expand...
The most effective vehicle for indoctrinating youth is through the public education system. It's depressing that so many Republicans oppose school choice because they are worried it will hurt the local school football program. They care more about a winning season than stopping a public school machine that continues to crank out future liberal voters.
 
Last edited:
horninchicago said:
You and I said essentially the same thing thing but @Mr. Deez only agreed with your comment. That's weird. What's up with that guy, @Mr. Deez?

@Sangre Naranjada I remembres to tag @Mr. Deez.

:coolnana:
Click to expand...

I agreed. lol

On topic though, I still think parents are derelict in this. I spent my first 8 years in Oakland, CA and frequently went into San Francisco (early '80s). I saw all kinds of f'ed up things - half-naked dudes walking around with whips and chains, drug addicts acting weird on the street and on the subway, guys wearing women's clothes, and of course, the one I'll never forget - the guy who was sitting in front of me on the trolley, got up at his stop, and was wearing assless chaps. He had his nasty, hairy, undoubtedly anally penetrated *** inches from my face for about ten seconds. I could see the back of the guy's sack. That was the grossest thing I saw, but I saw something messed up every time I went into the city.

Why didn't seeing that disgusting crap before the age of 9 screw me up? It was because my parents didn't care about sounding "judgy." My mom would say, "eww, that guy is disgusting; we need to stay away from him." My dad would say, "that guy's a mess." My older brother would just laugh in ridicule and say, "ha, ha! Look at that dude's nasty ***!"

I don't advocate letting kids be around this stuff. They didn't have a choice and got us out of there (moved to Plano) as soon as possible. The point is that when I was impressionable, people who had credibility with me drew boundaries and made clear judgments. I don't believe most kids nowadays have that.
 
Mr. Deez said:
I agreed. lol

On topic though, I still think parents are derelict in this. I spent my first 8 years in Oakland, CA and frequently went into San Francisco (early '80s). I saw all kinds of f'ed up things - half-naked dudes walking around with whips and chains, drug addicts acting weird on the street and on the subway, guys wearing women's clothes, and of course, the one I'll never forget - the guy who was sitting in front of me on the trolley, got up at his stop, and was wearing assless chaps. He had his nasty, hairy, undoubtedly anally penetrated *** inches from my face for about ten seconds. I could see the back of the guy's sack. That was the grossest thing I saw, but I saw something messed up every time I went into the city.

Why didn't seeing that disgusting crap before the age of 9 screw me up? It was because my parents didn't care about sounding "judgy." My mom would say, "eww, that guy is disgusting; we need to stay away from him." My dad would say, "that guy's a mess." My older brother would just laugh in ridicule and say, "ha, ha! Look at that dude's nasty ***!"

I don't advocate letting kids be around this stuff. They didn't have a choice and got us out of there (moved to Plano) as soon as possible. The point is that when I was impressionable, people who had credibility with me drew boundaries and made clear judgments. I don't believe most kids nowadays have that.
Click to expand...
Wow you went from the Bay area to the teen suicide capital. Glad you survived both.

My cousin and I were allowed, at age 12, to walk unaccompanied by my parents, through the french Quarter. No assless chaps and junk. Plenty of boobies.
 
Last edited:
horninchicago said:
Wow you went from the Bay area to the teen suicide capital. Glad you survived both.

My cousin and I were allowed, at age 12, to walk unaccompanied by my parents, through the french Quarter. No assess chaps and junk. Plenty of boobies.
Click to expand...

Trust me, I would have preferred the boobies. Lol
 
So the most progressive candidate won Chicago Mayoral. And how did the Chicago Tribune react to Johnson's speech where Johnson thanked God but not Obama?
"The omission was telling, a reminder that the progressive movement of which Johnson now is a Midwest standard-bearer, feels ambivalent about the former Chicago community organizer and his more pragmatic legacy."
:lmao:
OR :yikes:
 
Sangre Naranjada said:
All he has to do is chase a couple of ambulances and he will have the cash to fund the trip - and pay for beer too.
Click to expand...

I can't "chase ambulances" here. Not licensed to do it, and as Deez, Jr.'s homeschool teacher, I'd never have the time.

Also, though some contingent fee cases I handled made a lot of money, the other side of the coin is that I spent a hell of a lot of time (far more time, in fact) fighting with Farmers and Allstate Insurance over small amounts of money. On one case that only involved about $2,000 in chiropractic treatment, I took Farmers Insurance to trial. If I worked out the hourly rate on that, it would have been McDonald's wages. I thought it was a waste of time, but the guy paying my salary said, "we don't give in to Farmers and their ******** - ever."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top