Bringing the prediction thread over into context...
I predicted TCU would score 24 points and I like Coach K. Did TCU scoring 26 change my mind? No.
Now, would I be less emotionally drained if TCU scored 6, 7, 6, and 7 by quarter? Yes.
Why do people point at Coach K, and also EVERYONE is criticizing Sark for doing the same thing on offense? I'm not criticizing Sark here. I'm saying these coaches know what each other is doing and are in COMPLETE AGREEMENT with each other about their philosophy.
It is what it is. The coaches are playing to win and it's served them well in the win column (and, consequently, the loss column).
I predicted TCU would score 24 points and I like Coach K. Did TCU scoring 26 change my mind? No.
Now, would I be less emotionally drained if TCU scored 6, 7, 6, and 7 by quarter? Yes.
Why do people point at Coach K, and also EVERYONE is criticizing Sark for doing the same thing on offense? I'm not criticizing Sark here. I'm saying these coaches know what each other is doing and are in COMPLETE AGREEMENT with each other about their philosophy.
It is what it is. The coaches are playing to win and it's served them well in the win column (and, consequently, the loss column).