Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So many things had to line up for this game to be close:
- 2 bad INT’s and some poor throws to open receivers by MM
- OL motion penalties
- blocked punt
- Brooke’s fumble
- Sark not going for 3
- missed PI
Yet the team won, but literally nearly everything had to go south to make it so close. Rather remarkable in my opinion.
How many games in the last 10 years have we lost that we should have won ? In the past we would have lost the last 3 weeks.
I'll enjoy the feeling that we won a game that in the past we would have lost.
That can happen when you lose your starting QB and half your defensive starters to injury. Yet we still won.I do like Sark, and his pressers are excellent. He likes to say that we haven’t played our best game yet. To these eyes, we have not improved since the game in Tuscaloosa. In fact, we may have gone in the other direction.
Okay Captain Obvious.If we lose to any of the team’s remaining on our schedule we don’t deserve to be in the ccg.
Do other teams have players out with an injury, or is it just Texas?? Asking for a friend.
The last 2 NC teams have been won by teams WITHOUT a dual threat QB. the only team recently that won with a dual threat QB was Clemson with T. Lawrence. The current No. one team does not have a dual threat.For those who dont think we need a dual threat QB,watch the USC-Wash game
So what if this trend continues but we continue to win.So many games in Fark’s tenure where we
This is a problem. I mean we can blame injuries or the QB or the refs but this has been a theme regardless.
- dominate in many stats. Players shine and units thrive. Looks like we should roll. But still cones down the last possession to decide the game? Against inferior teams?
- Build a big lead early and lose the 2nd half.
I don’t think this guy is a good game day coach. Just my opinion. Lots of data to support.
This was when UT had the ball with a huge lead and 4 minutes to play in the 2nd quarter.Please dont ban me.
If Tex stops them on this possession, ball control.
We only lose if Maalik turns it iver now.
Sark, play it safe, no hurry up. Safe passes only.
I argued with people here wanting to pull VY as he “should be the TE”Some of y’all don’t remember the ride of being in a good season. I can pick and critique with the best of them and I have made them known, but it’s clear a lot of us don’t remember 05 or 08-09 as well as you think you do.
Another way to look at is, how many times , esp in the Akers years & Mack pre 2005, were we concerned about glaring issues with what we saw on the field yet most had the same outlook as yours above? It's whistling passed the graveyard. A win isn't a win if you're seeking a natty or being a serious challenger
Winning beats losing but what we're seeing, esp at qb and sark's in game decisions, are concerning.
This, and DS’s post above is the point for me.Suppose you manage a food processing plant that makes TV dinners. Multiple times your Quality department get's positive results for E. Coli. The USDA inspector checks the books and finds the positive tests. Your reply is no customer yet has contracted E. Coli poisoning. Just how long do you think the doors of that plant stay open?
I can tell you, there will be about 10 USDA inspectors shutting the place down in a NY minute. Sark has been playing Russian Roulette and eventually it fires. It's only a matter of time.
If I was a farking sponsor, I could correct my thread.So many games in Fark’s tenure where we
This is a problem. I mean we can blame injuries or the QB or the refs but this has been a theme regardless.
- dominate in many stats. Players shine and units thrive. Looks like we should roll. But still cones down the last possession to decide the game? Against inferior teams?
- Build a big lead early and lose the 2nd half.
I don’t think this guy is a good game day coach. Just my opinion. Lots of data to support.
Another way to look at is, how many times , esp in the Akers years & Mack pre 2005, were we concerned about glaring issues with what we saw on the field yet most had the same outlook as yours above? It's whistling passed the graveyard. A win isn't a win if you're seeking a natty or being a serious challenger
Winning beats losing but what we're seeing, esp at qb and sark's in game decisions, are concerning.
Good points!This, and DS’s post above is the point for me.
I don’t think we can simply say, “hey, we won these games this year and we didn’t last year, so what’s the issue?”
Expectations and analysis are based on many things, including the caliber of your team and its players, the caliber of the competition, the ebb and flow of the game, the decisions being made within the game, etc.
Wyoming was a red flag. Oklahoma was a loss. Then another red flag in Houston, and after a bye. And yesterday. The Houston and KSU games in particular are disconcerting. This team, with its talent, can’t go from complete domination at the 20 minute mark, to scrambling for a win — and hoping for a miracle— late in the game.
Of course, if we win the Big 12 and make the CFP, we will all be thrilled. But to suggest that everything is pretty much OK because a win is a win would be to ignore the glaring warning signs that Run alluded to in his analogy above.
In a word...yes. we expect more. Mucher more!So what if this trend continues but we continue to win.
We win the conference championship.
We went to playoff game.
Win the national championship.
All by building leads that we lose in the second half yet somehow pull out the win.
Will you still be complaining?
sometimes Sark play calling reminds me of Mackovic, Not as smart as you think you are