Rolovich fired for vaccine refusal

What's not correct? That is exactly the flow of the thread. I made a statement, later expanded on it and then you later want to claim I made an absolutist remark originally after it was clear what I intended? That's not "holding (anyones) feet to the fire" but rather trolling because it was clear what I meant. Thank you for self identifying as a troll. I'll put that opinion in the same place your claim that masks are 0% effective, ever, in limiting and respiratory illness spread. It's the antithesis of logic. Ignorance masquerading as intellect.

It wasn't clear. I was clear that you moved the goal posts. If realizing that and calling you on it is trolling, then anybody who responds to you is a troll.

If I moved the goal posts then quote me like I did you. I will admit it. But your point isn't clear to me.
 
It wasn't clear. I was clear that you moved the goal posts. If realizing that and calling you on it is trolling, then anybody who responds to you is a troll.

It wasn't clear after clarifying twice?
R U Serious 2.jpg
 
You never explained that what you meant was broader than just masks. You just changed your statement abruptly.

Maybe you are right. I am ignorant. It takes me a while to realize when things change. If you want to be understand you have to spell it out for me. Remember, I am ignorant.
 
You never explained that what you meant was broader than just masks. You just changed your statement abruptly.

I did albeit in a response to @Chop
My .02. Both ROK and Japan have a bit more collectivist culture. Mask wearing for them was already part of the culture. They don't wear them to protect themselves as much as the people around them. So, all the recommendations to limit the spread (mask-up, social distancing) were natural to those cultures.

Additionally, they don't have the obesity issues that the US has. Still, their populations are significantly older so they had that going against them. My BIL's wife lost 2 grandparents to COVID in Japan. Still, there is a reverence and desire to protect their elders that simply is on another level compared to the US. Those countries largely house their elderly with family rather than nursing homes which also is a factor in their favor.
 
I'm sorry. I thought you wanted attention since you jumped into a conversation you weren't a party in then proceeded to claim your gif wasn't intended exactly as it was intended. So, I was giving you affirmation. Was there a different affirmation you'd like? Happy to oblige. Personal attack? I haven't levied any epithets at you. I'm hoping to assuage your anger, give you some positive attaboys.

Pro-tip: Before asserting someone was not a party, you might want to re-read the thread and see who has posted. That was not my first entry in this thread.

I tend to value legal advice on this board from other lawyers a bit more. Of course, it all depends on how much WSU simply wants Rolo to go away or will they fight. Of course, this case may have significant ramifications for ~1,400 Washington State employees that chose to retire or were fired so there may be significant incentive to fight Rolo as far as his pocketbook will take him.

Don't care who you choose to value. But people like you were also claiming Gruden would get nothing...but guess what...he is getting a pretty good go-away package.

Rolovich isn't a first year coach. He is pretty comfortably set and probably doesn't mind dropping six figures to get a hefty two comma check in return...
 
Don't care who you choose to value. But people like you were also claiming Gruden would get nothing...but guess what...he is getting a pretty good go-away package.

You live in a perpetual state of straw men arguments. It's as if every argument is with some imaginary stick figure that you transpose what you think their perspective should be and you battle that perspective. For the record:

I doubt he walked away with the $70M he was owed. It's doubtful we'll ever get the details but I'm certain some sort of severance package was agreed upon. $70M is a lot of enchiladas to walk away from even with a "morals" clause in his contract.

I'd wager that the Raiders agreed to pay him for the remainder of the 2021 season ($10m/yr) to get him to go away.

As for this...
Rolovich isn't a first year coach. He is pretty comfortably set and probably doesn't mind dropping six figures to get a hefty two comma check in return...

Rolovich's primary hope is that WSU wants the PR to go away. If they don't mind the bad PR, they'll likely win in any court. Vaccine Mandates are legal, Governor's EO is legal, Washington an At-Will employer state all are in WSU's favor. Unless Rolovich's angle that he was being singled out by the AD has merit his case is flimsy. Looking at his contract structure he also already has the bulk of his money:

  • Year 1: $8 million
  • Year 2: $6 million
  • Year 3: $5 million
  • Year 4: $2 million
  • Year 5 and beyond: $1 million
He would have netted at least $11M so far. And at least $1M/year is media commitments which I'm guessing WSU isn't on the hook for. Rolo has a good nest egg to pursue some money but would be racking up lawyer costs along the way. Again, this is all a PR game. If WSU is willing to bear the brunt of the PR hit and the wrath of some anti-vax alumni, then they have the law on their side.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-10-28_16-36-12.png
    upload_2021-10-28_16-36-12.png
    45.9 KB · Views: 94
The lawsuit's coming:

Lawyer for Nick Rolovich calls WSU coach's firing 'unjust and unlawful'

Nick Rolovich plans lawsuit vs. WSU over COVID vaccine mandate firing


"Pope Francis and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops have stated that all COVID-19 vaccines are morally acceptable and that Catholics have a duty, responsibility or obligation to be vaccinated. However, some Catholics still oppose vaccination."

"— We’re not sure how deep Rolovich’s religious convictions run, but we hear Pope Francis is a pretty religious guy. He not only approves of the COVID vaccine but has advocated for it."

Chop's 2 pesos (and that's about what it's worth...):

Courts should reject the reasoning that, because a person is a member of a certain denomination, he or she must share all the official doctrinal beliefs of that denomination. A person's religious beliefs are often deeply personal, and while he may believe in the core beliefs of his denomination, he may also have his own personal religious beliefs that differ from some official dogma or another. That sounds like Rolovich's situation. To hold otherwise, means the freedom of religion only applies to the official stated dogma of formal, organized religion. That cannot be the law.


And here's the real reason for the firing...at the end of the day: "Defying Inslee’s order in any fashion could have massive political and financial ramifications for the university."

53013c8200fb8ff923523fb0bae65483--name-change-wear-red.jpg

Yep, Pope Francis wears the red shoes too!
If you know you know! He may be the Pope, he does NOT represent ANYONE'S religious beliefs.
 
53013c8200fb8ff923523fb0bae65483--name-change-wear-red.jpg

Yep, Pope Francis wears the red shoes too!
If you know you know! He may be the Pope, he does NOT represent ANYONE'S religious beliefs.

Why does the Pope wear red shoes?

Throughout Church history, the color red has been deliberately chosen to represent the blood of Catholic martyrs spilt through the centuries following in the footsteps of Christ. The red papal shoes are also linked to Christ’s own bloodied feet as he was prodded, whipped, and pushed along the Via Dolorosa on his way to his crucifixion, culminating in the piercing of his hands and feet on the cross. The red shoes also symbolize the submission of the Pope to the ultimate authority of Jesus Christ. Beyond this, it is said the red papal shoes also signify God’s burning love for humanity as exhibited during Pentecost when red vestments are worn to commemorate the decent of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles as tongues of fire rest upon their heads.
 
Take a deep breath before reading this.

Note the red shoes on the children in the pictures. #redshoeclub #pedogate #childtrafficking #endit

“The story I'm about to tell you is true.

Perhaps the most intriguing part of this story is that every single person reading this post - every single one of you - was alive when this story became news in 2004.

That fact is intriguing because everyone reading this post has either never heard this story, or forgot about it (I'm betting on the first one, because it is truly unforgettable).

Furthermore, once you hear this story in its entirety, I can promise it will be seared into your memory forever.

Our main character is a man named Marc Dutroux. He was born in Belgium in 1956. He was twice convicted of kidnapping and raping underage children. The first time was in 1989. The second time occurred in 1996.

That was not a typo - you read that correctly. He was convicted and served a (much too brief) sentence in 1998. He served only 3 and a half years of his 13 year sentence because he was released for good behavior. Less than 10 years later, he was arrested again on the same charges (different victims).

In the second round of charges, he was convicted of kidnapping, torturing and abusing victims, some of them to the point of death.

What I am about to tell you comes from the statements made by his surviving victims (called the X Files), Marc Dutreox himself, and evidence from law enforcement. I've also added references/citations at the very end of this post.

Here we go.

Marc confessed to kidnapping, raping, drugging, torturing and filming children for many years. He also claimed he was doing it at the behest of a political elite who financed his career as a professional trafficker.

Not only did this political elite finance his efforts - they made specific requests of him. Sometimes they requested specific types of children (they were called "party favors" and he was asked to deliver kids of certain age, sex, race). Sometimes they requested specific means of torturing the children to fulfill their desires (orgies, satanic rituals involving sacrifices, torture games).

And sometimes they requested he film certain influential people engaged in these acts, for later use as blackmail.

He claimed many of his customers and financiers were world leaders. This was not a stretch of the imagination because he lived in Belgium, where the EU and NATO headquarters were located. This statement was also corroborated by victims who were able to identify specific politicians.

Anneke Lucas was one of his victims who testified against him. She claimed she was 6 years old when the cleaning lady hired by her mother sold her to the pedophile network in 1969. Her claims were extraordinary:

-She was raped over seventeen hundred hours before turning 12 years old. -She was 6 years old when she was forced to participate in her first orgy, which included wearing an iron dog collar and eating human excrement. -She would actually be delivered back to her parents from time to time. However, her parents themselves were complicit in the crimes and always sent her back to her abusers. -Torture included being strapped to a butchers block used to execute other children. Other victims were forced to torture her for hours as part of their initiation. -She was considered attractive and that made her preferred by her abusers. She claimed that she tried to use that to her survival advantage to the best of her ability, but by the age of eleven, she had become so broken that she was slated to be executed and disposed of. -She said she was saved when one of her abusers negotiated for her freedom. That abuser would later sit as a defendant in the trial.

Other witnesses and victims would soon come forward, describing such things as “Black Masses,” with child and adult sacrifices taking place in front of observers and participants, which included prominent politicians and figures. This would be corroborated by a note found by police at the house belonging to Bernard Weinstein—a man who previously worked with Dutroux, but whom Dutroux had murdered. The letter contained very specific requests for certain types of victims for satanic sacrifices.

The letter was signed by a man who called himself 'Anubis'. It turned out 'Anubis' was the high priest of a satanic cult called 'Abrasax' whose real name was Francis Desmet. Police obtained a warrant and seized computers, documents, mail, actual human skulls, jars of blood, and all sorts of Satanic items - but none of this was enough to make an arrest.

As the Dutroux trial went public, other victims stepped forward and confirmed the testimony, offering up descriptions of sexual abuse and human sacrifice.

They also described “hunting parties” where elites would release naked children into the woods to hide, so that the elites themselves could hunt them down and slaughter them. Many of the stories from victims contained so many similarities, they were impossible to deny. For example, the hunting parties were often held at castles, where victims could not escape and were hidden from the public eye. Those not killed in the hunt were usually chased down and mauled/killed by Dobermans.

All of these victims echoed the testimonies of other, older survivors of ritual Satanic abuse from around the world.

It is also notable that Dutroux owned 10 homes valued at 6 million dollars.

It is also notable that Dutroux was not employed.

It is also notable that Dutroux received $1,200 per month in public assistance.

It is also notable that documents released by Wikileaks show large sums of money in various currencies were deposited into his wife's bank account.

It is also notable that those deposits coincided with reported kidnappings and missing children reports.

It is also notable that before his removal, judge Jean-Marc Connerotte was on the verge of publicly disclosing the names of high level government officials who had been recognized on video-tapes of sexual torture that took place in Dutroux's dungeon.

It is also notable that 20 potential witnesses for this case have died without explanation.

Does any of this sound familiar? Are there any headlines today that sound like history is repeating itself?

Guys, not one single thing in this post is theory. It's all proven and on record.

You see the pictures attached to this post? Those are images of hunting games. They're paintings that people like Tony Podesta buy, and hang in his home, and invite others over to enjoy.

We all know Epstein was a sick sob who had friends in high places - the same friends that hang out with Tony Podesta.

You think Epstein was the only one? That he's somehow unique? Or was he the low level one they were willing to sacrifice to protect everyone else involved at a higher level?

Do you realize now that when it comes to trafficking, satanism, pedophilia, human sacrifices, organ harvesting, adrenachrome - that it is art imitating life? That these people who are so obsessed with the art that glorifes these things might actually, themselves, be engaged in these things?

Do you think normal, non-pedo, non-cannibal, average Joes would hang that garbage up in their homes?

Suddenly the claims that world leaders and governments being involved in this satanic horror show isn't so far fetched after all.

Suddenly its not so crazy to say that world agencies who claim to stop these crimes (WHO, UN) are actually facades that cover up the real work of procuring and enabling - yes, even participating - in these crimes.

Suddenly the whole house of cards comes crashing down.

With this one case, all the unbelievers are silenced.

For crying out loud, this trial was in 2004! Did you remember it? If not, do you wonder why it was not front page news across the world?

And if you're asking yourself HOW DO THESE PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH THIS - have you not yet figured out that the very people who are supposed to end it, are doing it?

Most everyone has watched an Epstein documentary on Netflix - I think there's been maybe 3 or 4 made since his death. And the one thing I heard people say over and over and over again was this: "Where is Epstein's girlfriend and why hasn't she been arrested yet?"

Did anyone asking that question even try to find the answer? Or did you just shrug your shoulders and say, "Well, it is what it is and there's nothing I can do about it" and go on with your life?

Let me help you out.

Did you hear the news story from two weeks ago that President Trump fired federal prosecutor Geoffrey Berman? He was the prosecutor in charge of the Epstein case.

AG Barr requested Berman step down, and Berman refused. So Trump fired him and Berman was replaced with prosecutor Audrey Strauss. And then suddenly BAM! Maxwell is in custody.

You now get a front row seat for the horror show that is about to come out.

You will not believe who is involved and how deep it goes. And you will not believe the lengths they'll go to in order to protect their secrets.

I'm not saying anymore about this. Join Child Proof America and donate!
 
Maybe a tad off-topic, but to follow up on the post immediately above, I really hope G. Maxwell lives to testify, and that she spills the beans on all of Epstein's pedo pals. I bet many will be from both sides of the political aisle, both domestic and foreign business and political leaders, and from all over the entertainment world.
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top