Horn2RunAgain
2,500+ Posts
Overweight deserve to die. Not sure we need to count them in the total. /s
See there? No pandemic.
"Mystery solved, off you go"
- from the TV show Frasier
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Overweight deserve to die. Not sure we need to count them in the total. /s
Call me jaded but if there wasn’t a dress up party would any of these ladies care?
I am buying a table of ten myself. Who wants to join me in January in Houston on Friday, January 14th and the summit in SugarLand (Smart Financial Center) on Saturday, January 15th. You can buy individual tickets as well. Hopefully we can fill a few tables up. I am inviting hundreds of people. Per Child proof America there are 200K + Children sex trafficked per year in the US, 79K in Texas. Houston is #1 in the US for sex trafficking! I am all in on this blight on society. Who will join me???
It's the greatest threat to the elderly and overweight but claiming it's equivalent to flu is not accurate. That's not supported by any data I've seen. The flue is also the greatest threat to elderly and overweight but Covid-19 is on a level not previously seen since perhaps 1917.
So America is gonna potentially poison itself and go down economically to protect the fat and the near dead?
Philosophically, we spend a great deal of $ and heart at the end of life for no real benefit. Some of these cancer treatments make the last months of life painful. I think hospice is under utilized. The real question is do I think that for me/mine. We'll see one day, sadly.Plenty of folks these days seem to think like a British National Health System death panel. Old people, fat people, sick people, … let them die. And get on with it. Less financial strain on the system.
One is compulsory and the other is a choice. Big difference.Plenty of folks these days seem to think like a British National Health System death panel. Old people, fat people, sick people, … let them die. And get on with it. Less financial strain on the system.
One is compulsory and the other is a choice. Big difference.
Logan’s Run!One is compulsory and the other is a choice. Big difference.
Plenty of folks these days seem to think like a British National Health System death panel. Old people, fat people, sick people, … let them die. And get on with it. Less financial strain on the system.
What a fantastic idea! A political test for who lives and who dies that the death panels shall apply. What could go wrong?Let it apply only to liberals since they are the ones advocating for such BS.
Let it apply only to liberals since they are the ones advocating for such BS.
We were promised the death panels with the un-Affordable Care Act...now we see the push for them coming true.Plenty of folks these days seem to think like a British National Health System death panel. Old people, fat people, sick people, … let them die. And get on with it. Less financial strain on the system.
Someone clearly has not read this thread closely enough.
I have but for shits and giggles I just reread it. I can't find a single post from anyone conservative saying they want it. Quite to the opposite all over this west mall board I see many non liberals saying its a stupid idea. I also have seen libs saying unvaccinated should be denied treatment. Let liberals be subject to death panels since they are the ones advocating for it.
I think it's a threat to the elderly and the obese. Just going by data. Outside of those who are overweight or over 65, the flu seems to be a bigger threat to society, doesn't it? There are no mandates for the flu vaccine
If what bill Maher says is correct, 78%of covid deaths involved obese people, then it's no longer a mystery why 4 out of 5 deaths occur. Doesn't sound like much of a pandemic to me.
@Horn2RunAgain might be offended with you calling him a liberal.
Wow, how the hell did you stretch that to say he believes in death panels? Quoting statistics doesn't support anything. Did I miss him saying they should be denied the vaccine or something? The part you people never understand is that denying healthcare is different than not seeking healthcare.
It’s not that simple. What about the family who lost everything because of lockdowns on the healthy? Once you get beyond the hospitals being overloaded, it’s a matter of competing interests. What about the higher suicides, the higher road deaths, the higher strain on family finances? It’s not just about the fat people and the old.@Chop likened the lack of care for the overweight and elderly to the NIH Death Panels. It was the conservatives on the West Mall that have shared a callous lack of concern for the elderly and overweight based primarily around a claim that taking steps to protect those populations impact their "freedom" and pocketbooks. I gave you an example of one of the conservatives on the board expressing zero empathy for the elderly and overweight.
Not putting words in @Chop 's mouth but that particular conservative view to show no empathy for those populations most at risk is a default decision like the NIH example. Of course, in this case you have amateur medical practitioners advocating a survival of the fittest approach.
It was the conservatives on the West Mall that have shared a callous lack of concern for the elderly and overweight based primarily around a claim that taking steps to protect those populations impact their "freedom" and pocketbooks.
It’s not that simple. What about the family who lost everything because of lockdowns on the healthy? Once you get beyond the hospitals being overloaded, it’s a matter of competing interests. What about the higher suicides, the higher road deaths, the higher strain on family finances? It’s not just about the fat people and the old.
So you're saying the vaccine is ineffective? Or are you saying they're refusing the vaccine? I'm missing your point here. What do conservatives have to do with how fat and old people react to the virus?
This is the circle jerk y'all like to play. The vaccine is effective.....but it's the non vaccinateds fault even though it's well documented from practically every country on Earth the vaccinated are spreading the virus too. Again, it either works or it doesn't and what I do has no bearing on the fat and old. No one is deciding when or how they die like liberals around the world are suggesting.
Meanwhile, in the Unites States of effing America, we have libtiles clamoring to deny medical services to those who are "unvaccinated," no matter WHAT the service might be, because of "costs."Isn't that the point of the NIH comparison? Some are weighing financial impacts over the lives. The inference is that some are OK with more elderly and overweight (most impacted) dying rather than sacrifice economic growth. That's a choice. It's a choice that @Vol Horn 4 Life is saying isn't what we are debating. He's trying to tie liberals to that discussion when it's actually his ideological brethren advocating for wealth over life.
"Higher suicides, higher road deaths"? Hasn't the excess deaths analysis dispelled the notion that those increases are remotely comparable to the volume of Covid related deaths?
Further, the vulnerable can stay home while the healthy go work and play (capitalism - let some get rich for the benefit of everyone). Yeah, I know that doesn’t sound fair, but neither is it fair that the healthy stay home just because there are old and fat people who are vulnerable (socialism - make everyone miserable).So you're saying the vaccine is ineffective? Or are you saying they're refusing the vaccine? I'm missing your point here. What do conservatives have to do with how fat and old people react to the virus?
This is the circle jerk y'all like to play. The vaccine is effective.....but it's the non vaccinateds fault even though it's well documented from practically every country on Earth the vaccinated are spreading the virus too. Again, it either works or it doesn't and what I do has no bearing on the fat and old. No one is deciding when or how they die like liberals around the world are suggesting.
Meanwhile, in the Unites States of effing America, we have libtiles clamoring to deny medical services to those who are "unvaccinated," no matter WHAT the service might be, because of "costs."
Now tell us who is prioritizing costs over lives.
Video just within the past few days of a Nurse Practitioner calling 9-1-1 AFTER a diagnosis was made but before medication prescribed because she learned that the kid was not vaccinnated.Has anyone espoused that here? Maybe you should take that up with those that are "clamoring to deny medical services to those are "unvaccinated"" because they might be better prepared to answer that. Applying that to the progressives here is the typical strawman argument that is so prevalent here.
Isn't that the point of the NIH comparison? Some are weighing financial impacts over the lives. The inference is that some are OK with more elderly and overweight (most impacted) dying rather than sacrifice economic growth. That's a choice. It's a choice that @Vol Horn 4 Life is saying isn't what we are debating. He's trying to tie liberals to that discussion when it's actually his ideological brethren advocating for wealth over life.
Further, the vulnerable can stay home while the healthy go work and play (capitalism - let some get rich for the benefit of everyone). Yeah, I know that doesn’t sound fair, but neither is it fair that the healthy stay home just because there are old and fat people who are vulnerable (socialism - make everyone miserable).