Yes. If Wilson doesn't send the US into WW1, there is never Hitler or Nazis. The lesson is wars lead to cultural upheaval and more war. The more you know...
WWI is an issue which I'm still considering. If the US hadn't entered WWI, the Central Powers would likely have won, and Germany would likely dominate the continent. On the west, the Alsace-Lorraine, Belgium, and Luxembourg would likely be German. To the east, Austria, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belarus, and a hunk of western Russia would probably be German today. But there would have been some major upsides.
1. No Nazis or Hitler, which means no WWII (at least not in the European theater), and therefore . . .
2. Though Jews likely would have faced mistreatment, there probably would not have been a Holocaust.
3. You may still have had a Russian Revolution, but the Kaiserreich likely would have crushed the Bolsheviks in their infancy, and therefore . . .
4. No USSR, no Cold War, no PRC, no North Korea, no Ayatollah, and no Vietnam War.
5. Also, though it would have been humbled and had to share dominance with Germany, the British Empire likely wouldn't have fallen, since most of the nationalist movements in the Empire likely wouldn't have had significant external support from international communists.
6. The Ottoman Empire would control vast areas of the Middle East and North Africa. Though the Ottomans weren't choirboys, they were better than most of what's in charge now and has been in charge since decolonization.
7. Though the Kaiser would likely still be in place in Germany, by now, it would probably be more like the British monarch - a respected figurehead and source of national pride than a center of power. After all, the guy who'd be Kaiser now (Georg Friedrich Prinz) runs a brewery that makes an excellent Pilsner. He'd probably be cool.
On the other hand, some things could have gone badly. All of the above presumes that an undefeated Germany would have been largely benevolent, would have eventually given up its ambition of land, and would have eventually worked out its differences with the West (Britain, France, and the United States). Some possible downsides.
1. What would Germany have done with the ethnic majorities in its newly-conquered territories to the East? Hitler pushed Lebensraum and Drang nach Osten, but they weren't new to him. Imperial Germany believed in these too, including the Germanization of eastern nations. Maybe the Kaiserreich would have been nicer and less Jew-focused than the Nazis were, but those ideas were inseparable from ethnic cleansing. It would have gotten ugly.
2. More speculative than #1 but still a real possibility, what if the communists had eventually overthrown the Kaiser and taken power in Germany? Prior to the Machtergreifung, communism was a major political force in Germany both within its official party and within the SPD. In fact, at one time, the SPD was the largest Marxist party in Europe. Without the Nazis stomping it out (which is the main reason the political Left despises Hitler), a successful communist revolution wouldn't have been out of the question. That would have been even messier than the formation of the Soviet Union and would have negated a lot of the good things listed above.
3. What if a dominant Germany hadn't resolved its differences with Britain and undermined the Empire as the Soviet Union did? I suspect it would have resolved them in time, and we would have had a British Empire that ruled foreign territories through the Royal Navy and a German Empire that ruled most of continental Europe through the Imperial German Army, but it's not out of the question that it wouldn't have. And of course, that would have negated some of what happened above.
Just a lot to consider and unwrap.
