Post Left Wing looniness here

Mr. Deez said:
Hmm. What if it's a post-op trans dude (meaning a chick with a surgically created penis)? Would you give that action a chance, or is it all penises, real or alleged?
Click to expand...

You sure are asking a lot of questions on this topic. Are you sure you're not wanting me to find you something? :p
 
The Pedo teacher keeps talking about sexuality, which is sexual feelings. 3 year olds? Dude is sick.
Surprised the Quaker school supports him
 
Not sure where the OP was on thugs taking over Austin streets. Here is a NY Post link on it
"AUSTIN, Texas — Prominent voices blamed liberal, anti-cop policies for chaos in the city over the weekend after street racers took over city intersections, attacking law enforcement and setting people on fire in wild scenes which were caught on video.

“Austin voters wanted a Mayor, City Council, and [George] Soros [funded] DA who treat cops as criminals and criminals as victims,” tweeted the National Police Association, referring to the left wing billionaire, who is said to have funded Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza.

“This was not only predictable, it was predicted,” they added.

The public statement from the law enforcement organization came after one officer was injured, following four separate street racing incidents Saturday night into Sunday morning in the Texas state capital, Austin police said.

Reckless drivers blocked off intersections, doing donuts, terrorizing other motorists, throwing glass bottles, setting off fire works and starting fires. One Austin cop was hospitalized after being hit with rocks and bottles, but has since been released."
Woke city policies in Austin, Texas blamed for street racing chaos
 
Mr. Deez said:
It's a Quaker school in a liberal area. My guess is that there isn't a whole lot of Bible in this school
Click to expand...

In a Quaker school, I was expecting this:

j2ejob80x9by.jpg


Shows how out of touch I am with "private education" (pun intended).
 
Because what kids should be reading about is a story promoting a guy who thinks he's a woman and was a dumpster fire on COVID.

 
Taylor Lorenz is a whacked out woke reporter for Wapo. She blames the increase in teen suicide on capitalism and climate change
Then she tweeted this with which I agree 100% but not in the way she means
 
Horn6721 said:
Taylor Lorenz is a whacked out woke reporter for Wapo. She blames the increase in teen suicide on capitalism and climate change
Then she tweeted this with which I agree 100% but not in the way she means
Click to expand...


Put me in the delusional bucket.....

At any point in history if you focused on the worst of things, you could have written what she initially wrote. And at any point in history, you could have been optimistic. At the end of the day, it was those who were optimistic that changed the world......
 
Facing Addiction said:
Stop Teaching Kids to Say 'Sir' and 'Ma'am' (msn.com)

I always notice and respect someone who uses sir and ma'am. I also use those terms. Just one more thing to get offended by.....
Click to expand...

Of course the risk of "misgendering" someone is the top concern. Very stupid concept, and frankly, I'm not sure that the Right argues over the verbiage very wisely. When someone says we're "misgendering" them, I hear people like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh get into an endless haggle over there being only 2 genders. I understand the point, but I'm not a big fan. If you're arguing over gender, you're already conceding a lot to the gender ideologues, because there's too much subjectivity to that.

For example, I got into a spat on Twitter with a Scottish gender ideologue about a week ago, and as usual, he said I'd be "misgendering" somebody. Well, instead of haggling over how many genders there are, I just told him that I'm not referring to anyone's gender. I'm referring to one's sex. I basically said you can claim any gender you want, but the issue is how others (including the law) see you. I told him I identify people by their sex, not what I think their gender is. It left the guy with little to say.
 
Mr. Deez said:
Of course the risk of "misgendering" someone is the top concern. Very stupid concept, and frankly, I'm not sure that the Right argues over the verbiage very wisely. When someone says we're "misgendering" them, I hear people like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh get into an endless haggle over there being only 2 genders. I understand the point, but I'm not a big fan. If you're arguing over gender, you're already conceding a lot to the gender ideologues, because there's too much subjectivity to that.

For example, I got into a spat on Twitter with a Scottish gender ideologue about a week ago, and as usual, he said I'd be "misgendering" somebody. Well, instead of haggling over how many genders there are, I just told him that I'm not referring to anyone's gender. I'm referring to one's sex. I basically said you can claim any gender you want, but the issue is how others (including the law) see you. I told him I identify people by their sex, not what I think their gender is. It left the guy with little to say.
Click to expand...
I also think you can reply with the following:
I prefer to call people by their stated names, because each person is a unique individual worthy of respect.
 
Mr. Deez said:
Of course the risk of "misgendering" someone is the top concern. Very stupid concept, and frankly, I'm not sure that the Right argues over the verbiage very wisely. When someone says we're "misgendering" them, I hear people like Ben Shapiro or Matt Walsh get into an endless haggle over there being only 2 genders. I understand the point, but I'm not a big fan. If you're arguing over gender, you're already conceding a lot to the gender ideologues, because there's too much subjectivity to that.

For example, I got into a spat on Twitter with a Scottish gender ideologue about a week ago, and as usual, he said I'd be "misgendering" somebody. Well, instead of haggling over how many genders there are, I just told him that I'm not referring to anyone's gender. I'm referring to one's sex. I basically said you can claim any gender you want, but the issue is how others (including the law) see you. I told him I identify people by their sex, not what I think their gender is. It left the guy with little to say.
Click to expand...
You could also say that gender is a belief system whereas sex is biology.
 
F*** it, you are a Sir or Ma’m period, end of discussion.
If offended so very sorry about that ‘adios pendejo’.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top