The Brees and the Herman discussion is all about leadership, or more accurately, a lack of it. Leadership is all about taking the right position, not the popular position.
In fact, leadership often requires the courage to take an unpopular position, and to be heavily criticized for having done so. This has been the case throughout history. Retrospectively, many who courageously took the more controversial route and were criticized and threatened when they did so, are celebrated today for their courage. We all know (have read about) many of them.
I’m nobody’s hero or role model, BELIEVE ME, but I am proud to say that throughout my career I have tried to stand up — sometimes at some risk — for what I knew was right, contrary to the prevailing opinion at the time.
The “stands” I took cannot be compared to the decision Brees had to make this summer. Regardless, he made the wrong choice. He was a shrinking violet when there was a need for a courageous stand. Remember, this is/was a man who was revered by an entire city & state. He had massive winds behind his wings and had he stood tall, the silent majority would have been behind him.
Herman is simply an immature, self-centered individual who lacks judgment.
Both had a unique and significant opportunity to assume an important leadership role, and neither did. Brees must know that he made a mistake but as (I believe) Rain noted, he didn’t — and doesn’t — have the spine. That’s why, understandably, HIC used the POS assessment.
To me, Herman lacks so many attributes that it’s hard to know where to start.