Ah...now moving onto dismissal when you fail to actually provide what I asked.
This thread has been amusing.
Mop posts A. You say A is false. I ask for evidence that A is false. You provide a link to B. I point out that B != A. You post a link to C. I point out that C != A. You the post a link to D. I again point out that D != A. Plus, you add your condescending attitude of you're wrong, I'm right and you're stupid and I'm smart.
No wonder you lawyers like to strike engineers from juries...we actually expect you to prove what you state and not other side issues...
Not one of those three links you provided shows evidence of SSW from 1997-present. Two are completely unrelated and one, while related to SSW, gives a different time period. If you think they show evidence of SSW you should read them again...
And yet, you are arrogant enough to think you're proving your case with insults, strawmen and misdirection...
So, again, please provide a link showing evidence of SSW from 1997-present.
And, FWIW, I HAVE answered your questions...well, except for the last set...mainly because you refuse to provide what I've asked for and instead reply with multiple questions that are tangential to the issue at hand...you've done that several times on this thread. I suppose it's a tactic you use often in your job, but it gets tiresome...