Clean
5,000+ Posts
I did not know the jerk Dems have called for 23 more people to be interviewed.
And, you can bet if those 23 were interviewed, there'd be even more.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did not know the jerk Dems have called for 23 more people to be interviewed.
Democrats are voting no anyway. They said so from day one so it's all a dog and pony show anyway.Clearly Whitehouse did not clear this with Schumer
Fantastic...
So someone refresh my memory. Are we on "keep everything transparent and above board" or are we "protecting people involved in the process?" I'm having a hard time keeping that straight.
Anyone care to take a guess how the dems will present this report if this ends up being the case?
Is this unreal or what?So someone refresh my memory. Are we on "keep everything transparent and above board" or are we "protecting people involved in the process?" I'm having a hard time keeping that straight.
According to the WSJ, Mitch McConnell will call for a vote on Kavanaugh without knowing where 3 key Republicans stand or a completed FBI investigation.
I think Mitch must have an idea how the vote will play out. He doesn't strike me as much of a gambler.
And did you know that Faker took off for a month, hiding in Africa, in an attempt to bottle up any more of Trump's judges getting thru committee?
"[Flake] also said he was very "troubled" by the way Kavanaugh presented himself during last week's hearing, saying the Supreme Court "can't" have that.
"I was very troubled by the tone of the remarks," he said later, adding, "And I tell myself, you give yourself a little leeway because of what he's been through, but on the other hand, we can't have this on the court. We simply can't."
Is Shelia Jackson Lee the member of the House who received the July letter with Senator Feinstein?
Just gonna make a prediction here. Judas Flake is going to vote No regardless of what the FBI report says. ...
Just trying to understand why SJL was involved in this ... and caught on camera doing it (so to speak)She's bad, but she's not the freak show that SJL is.
I tend to agree. Grassley and Mitch need to concede Flake and put their time and focus on Collins/Murkowski and the vulnerable red state Dem Sens. And hide Mike Pence in the secret mountain in WVirg until needed.
Just trying to understand why SJL was involved in this ... and caught on camera doing it (so to speak)
Because she might be the biggest camera hog in politics.
I'm predicting he runs for POTUS in 2020 as a Democrat.Just gonna make a prediction here. Judas Flake is going to vote No regardless of what the FBI report says. A clip from the CNN article on his recent comments.
The fact that he's repeating the Democrats' talking points and hanging out with Soros' people tells me he's going to screw the GOP on this. Cocaine Mitch better be making sure he has Murkowski and Collins and that he's nailing down Manchin or Heitkamp.
This is indicative of the problem I have with Never Trump people like Flake. It was possible for a conservative not to support Trump during the election. After all, I didn't support him and gave my reasons here many times. However, regardless of who wins the Presidency, it is the obligation of a principled conservative to support a conservative policy agenda (including conservative judges). If you decide to sabotage a conservative policy agenda (which I at least suspect Judas Flake is going to do), you aren't acting on principle. You are selling out your principles to curry favor with the Left, whom Jeff Flake had previously spent several years fighting.
Have you EVER known SJL to pass up an opportunity to be captured on camera doing or uttering something stupid?Just trying to understand why SJL was involved in this ... and caught on camera doing it (so to speak)
I'm predicting he runs for POTUS in 2020 as a Democrat.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC