Kavanaugh's SC Confirmation Hearings

SH
No one has said an even of some sort may not have happened to the accuser.
Not to confused with saying based on everything so far including her vague and confusing stories yesterday and even her best friend saying she did not know Kavanaugh and was never at a party with him.
You ignored that sworn statement .
She lied about not being able to come to DC when asked because she was afraid to fly. To paraphrase Blumenthals mantra , if you lie once you will lie again.
 
Even after I point it out, Seattle comes on and absolutely proves my point. If we don't think Kavenaugh should be stopped, it's because she MUST be a liar.
1. Memories can be wrong
2. Every witness has denied the account
3. Still not even a shred of evidence.
I don't have to believe she's lying to look at those three points and say Kavenaugh shouldn't be dismissed.
But you keep slinging that mud!
 
Mr. Deez said:
They let a pro-life justice be replaced by the God-hating chief counsel for the ACLU.
Click to expand...

Totally forgot that fearing/loving God was a prerequisite for a seat. If it's as scandalous as attempted sexual assault or snorting blow or whatever seems to disqualify people, then don't confirm her.
 
What I continue to stumble over is the same thing that made Graham’s jaw drop - that she was unaware she could have testified in California. IMHO that is indicative there is manipulation going on by someone.
 
Horns11 said:
Totally forgot that fearing/loving God was a prerequisite for a seat. If it's as scandalous as attempted sexual assault or snorting blow or whatever seems to disqualify people, then don't confirm her.
Click to expand...
The point is that they didn't try to destroy a justice who was clearly hostile and adverse to them even though she was replacing someone who was favorable to them.
 
OK so tell me what they destroy RBG with? What accusations? If I recall, she was definitely asked about how her "personal beliefs" shape her legal decisions. If there truly is something to destroy her with, why didn't anyone take advantage of it? Is it because Republicans are just more trusting and only look at the merits of her qualifications? If yes, then we're still at the impasse. Because Garland would have easily gotten a hearing if so.
 
I wasn't there
The truth, I do not know
I'm not the one to decide
Only God knows what is so

I weep for my friend
Her story is the same
She lives with the memory
A boy played a power game

The untouchable saviors
They can only hurt you
Calm waters as you destroy
Is a disease, not a virtue

Innocent or not, victim or liar
Soon to be discarded for another
Who will be the first to say
Why must we destroy each other
 
Seattle Husker said:
That's easier when one starts by assuming the accuser is lying or inferring that the behavior was not assault. "Boys will be boys" is what multiple people stated earlier on this thread.

As the father of 3 teenage boys, I can't imagine thinking the ascribed behavior by Ford being acceptable. This is why conservatives will lose a generation of women when all is said and done.

Note that I'm NOT defending any Democrat politician and how they handled this situation. They clearly played politics.

Dr. Ford was simply trying to tell her story. The treatment by those on the right, and those on this board, should make anyone with a daughter ashamed. "Boys will be boys" indeed.
Click to expand...
Your position is anti-science. Memories are faulty. I will post articles.
 
I don't think this is any kind of resumption of a prevailing boys will be boys culture. There is no evidence that the adult Judge Kavanaugh has participated in untoward sexual behavior, nor abused alcohol. There is uncorroborated testimony that in a drunken state he groped a 15 year old and may have had intent to assault her. As Joe Fan has pointed out, it's entirely possible that she is sincere, honest and mistaken. The facts are irretrievable. We can't end the carreers of exceptionally gifted people absent provable facts.
 
????
SH :"As the father of 3 teenage boys, I can't imagine thinking the ascribed behavior by Ford being acceptable. This is why conservatives will lose a generation of women when all is said and done."

How could the accuser have been treated any better yesterday? The conservatives gave her the platform she wanted, bending over backwards.
I think Mothers of sons will be outraged that a woman could destroy their son's lives with a allegation from years ago with none of the people she said were there backing her up.
 
Seattle Husker said:
That's easier when one starts by assuming the accuser is lying or inferring that the behavior was not assault. "Boys will be boys" is what multiple people stated earlier on this thread.

As the father of 3 teenage boys, I can't imagine thinking the ascribed behavior by Ford being acceptable. This is why conservatives will lose a generation of women when all is said and done.

Note that I'm NOT defending any Democrat politician and how they handled this situation. They clearly played politics.

Dr. Ford was simply trying to tell her story. The treatment by those on the right, and those on this board, should make anyone with a daughter ashamed. "Boys will be boys" indeed.
Click to expand...
Once again, SH constructs a straw man worthy of Obama. At best, her memory is wrong. At worst she is lying. The cal-Irvine prof in the article above had an interesting take: how did she know it was Kavanaugh 37 years ago before he was famous? Isn’t it convenient that she recovered her memory after Kavanaugh became famous? Wouldn’t Kavanaugh be as unremarkable back then as the year or week it occurred, the location, the witnesses, etc that she couldn’t recall with any clarity ? So why all of sudden he is clearly remembered?
 
I cant even go to lunch and exercise without FFFFFFFFFFFing FFFFFFFFlake FFFFFFFFFFFing everything up

Seems clear in the delay, which Grassley foolishly allowed, was used by each Dem to filibuster with nonsense, to allow time for them to purchase Flake.
Is there another take?

This is an example why R-voters so often hate their own people. Every time the Rs show them comity or respect, the Ds just pivot and abuse them. Every time.
 
DoM5oSGUYAEeCdI.jpg
1
 
So maybe it's already been said on here, but I looked Flake up and he will not run for re-election for his seat. So it's a lame-duck obstructing things on the right. The article I read said he has written a book called Conscience of a Conservative: A Rejection of Destructive Politics and a Return to Principle, which expanded on his criticisms of Donald Trump. He also has hinted about a GOP run for President in 2020.
 
It's not that another week is a killer for Kavanaugh's prospects or that the FBI is likely to find anything. It's that it gives DiFi, Cory, and Kamala another week to plot and scheme. No telling what they'll come up with. They probably have a morgue dump dead bodies on Kavanaugh's lawn and claim that he killed them. These people are completely unhinged.

That and they'll probably draw a week out into a month.
 
Think about the context of what is happening on this level (notwithstanding the hatred of Trump and bitterness over Garland):

A mistake (unproven) at the age of 17 that was not rape is more shocking and heinous than aborting a viable fetus which to the Left has the moral equivalency of your tonsils or appendix.

And further, all Kavanaugh said was that prior court precedent was not etched in stone. It was a truthful response to a general question.
 
Murkowski is joining Flake in backing delay in the Senate vote

In reality, this is not about allowing time for the FBI to "gather more facts." What they want is more time to buy off a small group of waffle-prone Senators. Plus, it allows time for another suppressed 35-year old "memory" to rise. Maybe they will also discover a hidden yearbook page showing the Judge drinking a beer while farting at the same time?
 
Last edited:
Joe Fan said:
...Seems clear in the delay, which Grassley foolishly allowed, was used by each Dem to filibuster with nonsense, to allow time for them to purchase Flake.
Is there another take?....
Click to expand...

Indeed, Flake was spotted entering one of the chamber anterooms filled only with Democrats
 
Mitch can, if he wants, still bring it to a floor vote. This would smoke out Flake and Murkowski. But its not usually how Mitch rolls. He normally doesnt act unless he knows exactly how all the votes will fall.
 
Joe Fan said:
Indeed, Flake was spotted entering one of the chamber anterooms filled only with Democrats
Click to expand...
Joe Fan said:
Mitch can, if he wants, still bring it to a floor vote. This would smoke out Flake and Murkowski. But its not usually how Mitch rolls. He normally doesnt act unless he knows exactly how all the votes will fall.
Click to expand...
Never ask a question in court you don't already know the answer to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top