Joe Biden Accomplishment Thread

Personally I do not care if she goes or doesn’t but I think the thought is that she currently ignores or disputes that there is a problem which, if she did go, would be hard for her to disavow. My opinion.
 
:facepalm: Biden stumbling around at G7 is an embarrassment for USA. One Brit MP commented that Trump stayed focused while Biden can't keep up even with note cards.
And the vid of him stumbling into a public cafeteria with people laughing at him as Jill rushes in to lead him off is just sad. Jill needs to put him on a leash.

I wonder what those who voted for him think.? No one on here ever defends his demented acts.
 
@Mr. Deez the reason we care if she goes is because if Trump or Pence hadn't gone to this point into the Administration, it would have been 24/7 vilification from the media. Yes, she gets asked about it, but then there is no vilification.

Equal vilification for all.

Agree with you. She's a dunce and buffoon who can't effect anything besides duncery and buffoonery, so who cares what she does or where she goes?
 
Personally I do not care if she goes or doesn’t but I think the thought is that she currently ignores or disputes that there is a problem which, if she did go, would be hard for her to disavow. My opinion.

So if she went and said there's a problem but said we need to focus on "root causes" rather than border security (which is basically what she's doing without going there), you'd be cool with that?
 
@Mr. Deez the reason we care if she goes is because if Trump or Pence hadn't gone to this point into the Administration, it would have been 24/7 vilification from the media. Yes, she gets asked about it, but then there is no vilification.

Equal vilification for all.

Agree with you. She's a dunce and buffoon who can't effect anything besides duncery and buffoonery, so who cares what she does or where she goes?

I don't disagree with you, but you're sorta illustrating my point. You don't really care if she goes. You care about her being vilified the way Pence would be.
 
I don't disagree with you, but you're sorta illustrating my point. You don't really care if she goes. You care about her being vilified the way Pence would be.
That's right. I don't deny it. If the media will vilify Rs but not Ds for the same thing, that is the problem. That is where the dishonesty leads to misinformed people.
 
So if she went and said there's a problem but said we need to focus on "root causes" rather than border security (which is basically what she's doing without going there), you'd be cool with that?
It would be more honest. Also she would see the impact of their policies.
 
Nope, would not be cool with that, however if she went down there and said “holy s***, we have a problem at the border” I’d be cool. Going and saying as you suggested would just be more uncool. As I said I really don’t care personally I’d she goes or not but as the ‘breath away’ person I care that she’s so nonchalant about something I consider quite serious. As others have said she’s in over her head - which, btw, I find an amusing description of her.
 
Let's face it, most politicians don't usually need to go anywhere. It is the symbolism of it. And, it is the political nature of the media to use this more against Rs than Ds.
 
I really don’t care personally I’d she goes or not but as the ‘breath away’ person I care that she’s so nonchalant about something I consider quite serious.
Precisely, nashhorn. The fact that she won't face up and say anything is very bothersome - it indicates that the Biden administration either (a) doesn't understand or (b) doesn't care. Either of those is unacceptable.
 
I think one good reason for her to go down is to see the problem for herself. I don’t know what her people are telling her, they could be telling her everything is fine and going as planned. Or they could be telling her the truth and she doesn’t a photo of her in the **** show.
 
I don't disagree with you, but you're sorta illustrating my point. You don't really care if she goes. You care about her being vilified the way Pence would be.

I'm hung-up on pointing out hypocrisy. I am also very cynical. It seems border security is much more emotional here than talking to some Central American politician not-withstanding the political attacks on Kamala. So it's easier for her to go all the way down there and act like she's smarter than everyone with her approach. Meanwhile Mexico continues to send hordes over.

Her defensiveness and attempts to blow-hard her way through the problem is who she is. That is what she does. She should have stayed as a DA.
 
Precisely, nashhorn. The fact that she won't face up and say anything is very bothersome - it indicates that the Biden administration either (a) doesn't understand or (b) doesn't care. Either of those is unacceptable.
It can be both, and in this case it is.
 
I read the Dems know it’s a shît show on the border and they are basically trying to hide or ignore it until it gets better. They may claim “root causes” but no one believes it. If people did believe it, this past trip to Central America would have been a success. This is the dishonesty the media never calls out, which actually matters to real people in this case vs saying Trump is lying over an exaggeration that doesn’t harm anyone.
 
mc
But the American people know, heck even the leftists in here know.
Wray had to admit the cartels are getting massive amounts of drugs across thanks to Biden etc.
This is no street fair, this is war and we are losing.
 
They may claim “root causes” but no one believes it.

I actually think there is a root cause problem, and it's corruption and poor economic management in Latin America. They need fewer sleazy public officials (and even those who aren't sleazy should be less powerful) and more free enterprise. However, there isn't a lot we can do about that.
 
I actually think there is a root cause problem, and it's corruption and poor economic management in Latin America. They need fewer sleazy public officials (and even those who aren't sleazy should be less powerful) and more free enterprise. However, there isn't a lot we can do about that.
There is a term for that: shît hole countries but Dems can’t use that argument lest they legitimize Trump.
 
Deez
You have a severe case of TDS
Trump supporters have long pointed out the problems in those corrupt countries.
That does not mean we have to suspend Our laws and open our borders to everyone.
 
I don't see why everybody wants her to go to the border. She would not talk to anybody who knows what is going on and if she did she would not hear what they would be telling her.

One thing that might help: the BP could tell her the huge numbers coming now, as opposed to the huge numbers coming before, are lured by the idea that America now has an heir apparent who is a strong, vibrant, intelligent, beautiful woman of color who will be serving free Bubble Up and Rainbow Stew when her time comes up. She would believe that.

Sorry, but I wanted to see if I could type that last paragraph without laughing or throwing up. Just laughter as it turns out
 
Deez
You have a severe case of TDS

Lol. Severe? I'm a guy who has defended his economic policies, some of his trade policies, his judicial nominations, and basically take his side against the media. If mine is severe, then what is Brian Stelter's?

Trump supporters have long pointed out the problems in those corrupt countries.

Yes, but we need a little more nuance than just calling them "**** hole countries." That's fine when you're in 6th grade. Adults should do better.

That does not mean we have to suspend Our laws and open our borders to everyone.

Never said we should.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top