ISIS looking at Southern border

Yes Paso, only nitwits would want be in favor of secure borders. Again, you offer no solid defense of your position. Behar at her finest!
 
You go girls:

6b2266e2601a5b82f3f4e527331fdb2df4958729_r.jpg


smile.gif
 
You really do just make **** up.

My previous posts indicated that we have significantly increased border security following 9/11 (which is true). I showed disdain for the claim that the border is "insecure" and extreme skepticism at how much more security you guys really want as opposed to an anti-immigrant No-Nothing fall campaign screed. I also have repeatedly ridiculed the ISIS in Juarez claim. Judicial Watch just made this **** up.

How all of this gets turned into a strawman of "open borders" only the twisted atrophied brain of a right wing hack could explain. I did enjoy your little racial quip directed at me. I will give you a hint about my ethnicity. My family traces back to 1637 in Massachusetts. We did not have to undergo a background check or immigration control although I bet the natives now wish that they did.
 
Open border is the biggest reason that I have a "club" on my steering wheel, have to step over dirty diapers in the parking lot, and pay extremely high taxes. This is enough reason to control the border even if terrorism was not a threat ( which it certainly is ).
 
paso
Facts doen't seem to matter to you. The border is not the most secure it has been in your lifetime.
And you silly remark about there having been no check on your ancestors in the 1600s is meaningless. You know the difference.
well meaningless unless You want things done now as they were in the past.
 
BI
My post to paso was directed at his comment
quote from paso earlier in thread
'The border is way more secure now than it has been in my lifetime"

since last Oct.75K so called minors waltzed in. We have zero idea how many came in while the BP was distracted babysitting nor do we know the motives of those who came in.
It is silly to say the border is more secure.
 
They "waltzed" in? The fact that we had the detention center overcrowding issue denotes they were captured while waltzing. Doesn't that point to a higher level of border security? Or, is this like the voter fraud issue where you try to bolster your argument by pointing to a lack of evidence?
 
Husker
The first illegals waltzed across the border. Then they apparently started " trotting "across paso's more secure than at anytime in his life border.
The Link
 
Is 75k a lot of captured illegal immigrants in a given year?

How does this compare or is context beyond your capabilities?
 
paso
that is 75K minors or illegals pretending to be minors

and the corralling of these ' minors' took too many agents away from their border duties. so we don't know who or how many came in.
You can read what the Border agents who work there say or you can continue to pretend.
 
barely literate clowns

You do not think the numbers of "illegals" apprehended in 1990 or 2000 or 2010 are relevant?

BTW these children are properly called refugees or asylum seekers. Many and perhaps most of them will be entitled to asylum in the United States. It is incorrect and offensive to call them illegal particularly since they are perfectly legal until their status is determined by an immigration judge.

I know you barely literate clowns will miss this nuance.

BTW how many asylum seekers has the US had each year since 1975?
 
So, the border patrol agents are lying when they say the border is not secure. Let's just say for the sake of argument that it is secure. Don't you think the reason would be increased border security coupled with the fact that it's been such a hot issue?

Regardless, only extreme naivety would lead someone to believe that it's secure. You mock the fact that's it's a political issue for the right. It needs to be an issue. So, while you may not be in favor of open borders, you seem to ridicule the fact that it's become an issue. There are an estimated 12 million people here illegally. We can't afford to absorb anymore.
 
That's a lot of verbiage without attribution. You also did not address any of BI's points.

I am not surprised. The truth does not matter at all to you nitwits.
 
I know you are being a piss ant. I could say it was a hot sunny day and you'd find something in the sentence to whine about.

But once paso gives his age I can give a precise answer.
At this point without knowing my assertion that we are not more secure than at any time in his life can be disproved anymore than paso's assertion that the border is more secure than at any time in his life can be proved.

Most intelligent people watch what s going on,read what Border agents report and understand the border is not a secure place.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Back
Top