Impeachment

I made this wiretapping argument in here 3 years ago
Which one of you lurkers is Matt Gaetz?
I dont mind, I just want to know


Smiled when I saw these. Really effing BIG smile.
The whole Barron Trump line by Karlen was pre planned. Teed up. The way she delivered the line was as if she rehearsed it all week. Worse yet was the laughter at that jab at a POTUS' 13yo son.

Scum.
 
Last edited:
You could put 20 ladies in a room and have 10 of them liberals. I could pick out the 10 liberal women with ease. That lady who is a constitutional lawyer has the typical appearance of the leftist. Liberal women are so friggin fugly. Yeah I said!
 
You could put 20 ladies in a room and have 10 of them liberals. I could pick out the 10 liberal women with ease. That lady who is a constitutional lawyer has the typical appearance of the leftist. Liberal women are so friggin fugly. Yeah I said!

She looks like Doris Kearns Goodwin's sister. Political lean, the same as well
 
You could put 20 ladies in a room and have 10 of them liberals. I could pick out the 10 liberal women with ease. That lady who is a constitutional lawyer has the typical appearance of the leftist. Liberal women are so friggin fugly. Yeah I said!

Theres a smoking hot Jewish girl at UT I see at one of the local bars who is liberal as ****. I makes me cry. That and because Im twice her age lol
 
I'm surprised the Democrats brought in Karlan. She is an awful witness and advocate. She's smug, shrill, obnoxious, and frankly, didn't present her case well. If the idea was to find a sensible and reasonable but compelling advocate for impeachment, she definitely wasn't it.

With all the Left wing law professors out there, they surely could have found better and someone who comes across as less partisan and hacky.
 
I'm surprised the Democrats brought in Karlan. She is an awful witness and advocate. She's smug, shrill, obnoxious, and frankly, didn't present her case well. If the idea was to find a sensible and reasonable but compelling advocate for impeachment, she definitely wasn't it.

With all the Left wing law professors out there, they surely could have found better and someone who comes across as less partisan and hacky.
Just shows how out of touch they are.
 
Cancel Culture is, of course, now trying to get GW Law Professor Jonathan Turley fired for his testimony. Chairman Mao would absolutely love these people

click once to enlarge
Screenshot-2019-12-04-20.07.25-696x322.png
 
Last edited:
Antifa is training the college kids to go home at Christmas and really bash the parents and grandparents.
Pelosi's announcement today was the dog whistle to begin drills for shouting down and intimidating the boomers.

 
Here is “constitutional expert” Pamela Karlan back in 2006 on an irrational hate-filled tirade

Believe it or not, Hillary Clinton had this woman on her shortlist for the Supreme Court. I know that there are some posters in here who call themselves either Republican and/or Libertarian and/or Conservative who refused to vote for Trump and who, thus, were willing to let someone like this on the SCOTUS. But can you imagine being an appellant before her and she knew you were what she would call "right-wing?" Do you think you and your side would get a fair hearing from her?

bisexual Jewish women have more right to love America than white people do
 
Last edited:
Smiled when I saw these. Really effing BIG smile.
The whole Barron Trump line by Karlen was pre planned. Teed up. The way she delivered the line was as if she rehearsed it all week. Worse yet was the laughter at that jab at a POTUS' 13yo son.

Scum.
It's laughter at his father who named his son Barron, after a fake name he used to use to call in as a "spokesman" for Mr. Trump. LOL
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-HOGS *
Sat, Nov 16 • 11:00 AM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top