IMO, the Fix is in

When people tell you that massive voter fraud is a myth show them this.


I checked in to see whether the West Mall is the same as usual. The first post I saw confirmed that it is.

In the Clark County, NV District C Commissioners race, there were 153,162 votes counted — a 139-ballot discrepancy from the number of people who checked in to vote. This 0.096% discrepancy is normal — there are small discrepancies in every election — and it usually doesn’t matter. But in this case, the margin between 1st and 2nd was 10 votes, or 0.0065%. Because the discrepancies dwarfed the margin, the election board decided to redo the vote.

There is no evidence of voter fraud in this case, much less “massive voter fraud”. It’s just a natural consequence of letting humans run an election.

Here’s the first link I found on a Google search.

I guess it’s time for me to go back into hibernation. I hope you guys have fun circle-jerking each other.
 
I checked in to see whether the West Mall is the same as usual. The first post I saw confirmed that it is.

In the Clark County, NV District C Commissioners race, there were 153,162 votes counted — a 139-ballot discrepancy from the number of people who checked in to vote. This 0.096% discrepancy is normal — there are small discrepancies in every election — and it usually doesn’t matter. But in this case, the margin between 1st and 2nd was 10 votes, or 0.0065%. Because the discrepancies dwarfed the margin, the election board decided to redo the vote.

There is no evidence of voter fraud in this case, much less “massive voter fraud”. It’s just a natural consequence of letting humans run an election.

Here’s the first link I found on a Google search.

I guess it’s time for me to go back into hibernation. I hope you guys have fun circle-jerking each other.

If I'm wrong then I'm wrong. However, you can go jump in a lake. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Damn, this **** is getting tiresome. Trump has brought his lawsuits. If he has evidence that there was something wrong with the election (whether in fraud, miscounts, etc.), he'll get to submit it. Until that happens (or doesn't happen), this discussion is pretty irrelevant.
 
Damn, this **** is getting tiresome. Trump has brought his lawsuits. If he has evidence that there was something wrong with the election (whether in fraud, miscounts, etc.), he'll get to submit it. Until that happens (or doesn't happen), this discussion is pretty irrelevant.
Its exhausting. Its embarrassing that grown adults act this way. Trump lost. Voter fraud allegations are being proven false. First it was they "found" votes laying around to give to Biden. Now its faulty voter machines. Next it will be the glue on the back of stamps. Or it was above 70 degrees in Arizona so votes melted from Trump to Biden or some **** like that. Its just Trump being Trump (ego, crybaby). You can analyze all you want about "cheating", I have seen here someone said, If Biden won why did so many Rs win down ballot spots? That seems illegal. If you take your blinders off it is easy to see. People like the Rs policies right now but the hate Trump. Trump lost this election. Let it go. If your SO passionate about Trump try focusing on maybe a run in 4 years.
 
I think Biden won and I think there was voter fraud. Biden can be president and fraudsters can go to jail. Everyone wins!
 
I think we had a choice between two defectives and one of them will be sworn in come January and then this show will start over again. Whoop, as our Aggie friends say.

we elected Chance the Gardener over Mussolini. Can I get a Whoop?

how otherwise sentient people on this board can take either of these knuckle draggers seriously is beyond my poor powers of perception.
 
I think we had a choice between two defectives and one of them will be sworn in come January and then this show will start over again. Whoop, as our Aggie friends say.

we elected Chance the Gardener over Mussolini. Can I get a Whoop?

how otherwise sentient people on this board can take either of these knuckle draggers seriously is beyond my poor powers of perception.
A. Funny.
B. Biden was a serious person before flip phones were a thing. The key is if he hires a serious cabinet.
C. I could get on board with someone telling me there was significant voter fraud in states that did automatic mail ballots - Nevada? States that simply ramped up their absentee system that was already in place are fine in my mind.
 
Its exhausting. Its embarrassing that grown adults act this way. Trump lost. Voter fraud allegations are being proven false. First it was they "found" votes laying around to give to Biden. Now its faulty voter machines. Next it will be the glue on the back of stamps. Or it was above 70 degrees in Arizona so votes melted from Trump to Biden or some **** like that. Its just Trump being Trump (ego, crybaby). You can analyze all you want about "cheating", I have seen here someone said, If Biden won why did so many Rs win down ballot spots? That seems illegal. If you take your blinders off it is easy to see. People like the Rs policies right now but the hate Trump. Trump lost this election. Let it go. If your SO passionate about Trump try focusing on maybe a run in 4 years.

Honestly, I don't even have a problem with the challenges. I'm very much of an "open courts" guy, and if there are problems with the electoral process, they should absolutely be hashed out in public, even if they don't change the outcome. What whips me is the speculation, rumor-mongering, refusal to begin the transition, refusal by Trump to acknowledge at least probable defeat, etc. The mechanics of the transition should be happening now even as the court challenges are taking place.
 
Last edited:
His screen name says it all. Uses a name that automatically brings to mind one of the worst days in the history of the University. What do you expect?
horninchicago: I tried to make a serious point. I don't understand your snide snide dismissal, but ok. "What do you expect?" I think most people here would expect that I will state my opinions fairly, and even if they disagree, I think most would expect that my opinions will not be blind repetition of talking points from one "team." On the issue of whether NK has continued their march to being a nuclear player since the summit, I don't have a link now, but I don't think what I stated is particularly controversial. I'll go get you a link.
 
horninchicago: I tried to make a serious point. I don't understand your snide snide dismissal, but ok. "What do you expect?" I think most people here would expect that I will state my opinions fairly, and even if they disagree, I think most would expect that my opinions will not be blind repetition of talking points from one "team." On the issue of whether NK has continued their march to being a nuclear player since the summit, I don't have a link now, but I don't think what I stated is particularly controversial. I'll go get you a link.
Fair enough. Still not a fan of the name you chose, but whatever.
 
I don't know which of these you would consider "verifiable links," horninchicago, but, again, the point is not particularly controversial.

US and South Korea closely monitoring North Korean nuclear complex, military official says

North Korea has unveiled new weapons, showing Trump failed to tame its nuclear program

North Korea building up nuclear arsenal, researchers say

The Hanoi Summit Was Doomed From the Start
Two years after he enthusiastically declared on Twitter that “there is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea,” classified assessments and experts outside government conclude that the country’s arsenal is far larger than it was when the leaders held the historic meeting, the first of three. The estimates vary, but most conclude the North has amassed enough fuel for about 20 nuclear weapons in the time since the two men strolled through a garden in Singapore for the ultimate post-Cold War photo opportunity. Two Years After Trump-Kim Meeting, Little to Show for Personal Diplomacy

North Korea Is Still Producing 'Fissile Material' Despite a Pledge to Denuclearize, Mike Pompeo Says:

North Korea Is Still Making Fuel For Nuclear Weapons: Pompeo

North Korea making bomb fuel despite denuclearization pledge: Pompeo
 
Honestly, I don't even have a problem with the challenges. I'm very much of an "open courts" guy, and if there are problems with the electoral process, they should absolutely be hashed out in public, even if they don't change the outcome. What whips me is the speculation, rumor-mongering, refusal to begin the transition, refusal by Trump to acknowledge at least probable defeat, etc. The mechanics of the transition should be happening now even as the court challenges are taking place.
Completely 1000% AGREE! Trumps lawyers have walked away from law suits due to no evidence of his "voter fraud" claim. Some of the law suits now are over technicities on ballots to see if they can be thrown out. Its all a joke. Actually its sad. Its sad that our country has to endure this. Not letting the transition happen shows us more that Trump is not a real leader/man. Trump is an embarrassment to our country. Jan 20th can't come fast enough. It makes me ashamed that I voted for the man.
 
Last edited:
I don't know which of these you would consider "verifiable links," horninchicago, but, again, the point is not particularly controversial.

US and South Korea closely monitoring North Korean nuclear complex, military official says

North Korea has unveiled new weapons, showing Trump failed to tame its nuclear program

North Korea building up nuclear arsenal, researchers say

The Hanoi Summit Was Doomed From the Start
Two years after he enthusiastically declared on Twitter that “there is no longer a Nuclear Threat from North Korea,” classified assessments and experts outside government conclude that the country’s arsenal is far larger than it was when the leaders held the historic meeting, the first of three. The estimates vary, but most conclude the North has amassed enough fuel for about 20 nuclear weapons in the time since the two men strolled through a garden in Singapore for the ultimate post-Cold War photo opportunity. Two Years After Trump-Kim Meeting, Little to Show for Personal Diplomacy

North Korea Is Still Producing 'Fissile Material' Despite a Pledge to Denuclearize, Mike Pompeo Says:

North Korea Is Still Making Fuel For Nuclear Weapons: Pompeo

North Korea making bomb fuel despite denuclearization pledge: Pompeo
While I agree with you in your statements I do agree with @horninchicago. Maybe you should reconsider a name change....
 
Here is the WI analysis. I suggest you read the MI and PA analyses below if you haven't already. I'm looking at you WillUSAF. This is the data which Sidney Powell is looking into as far as I understand.

 
Here is analysis on GA vote collection.


Lets just say, anything Sidney Powell says I will be wearing my boots. She is a Trump blowhard. And if any of that is factual and there is any thing illegal why are they not proving it in court? It is all hearsay. If you prove to me legally then I will believe it. But again even Trump's magical legal team can't prove any of the allegations. Its too bad ya'll are blinded by Trump and his lies to boost his ego and is selfish to the American people. This is worse than the Clinton supporters crying in 2016.
 
Last edited:
Lets just say, anything Sidney Powell says I will be wearing my boots. He is a Trump blowhard. And if any of that is factual and there is any thing illegal why are they not proving it in court? It is all hearsay. If you prove to me legally then I will believe it. But again even Trump's magical legal team can't prove any of the allegations. Its too bad ya'll are blinded by Trump and his lies to boost his ego and is selfish to the American people. This is worse than the Clinton supporters crying in 2016.

"He"? You don't even know she's a woman and somehow SHE'S a blowhard.
 
Here is analysis on GA vote collection.



Are they trying to make us believe this many 80%+ballot dumps? Even if it's mail in ballots it should only be 65-70% advantage for the dem.

Edit-Could I be wrong and the % changed in this election for mail in ballots?
 
Last edited:
Lets just say, anything Sidney Powell says I will be wearing my boots. He is a Trump blowhard. And if any of that is factual and there is any thing illegal why are they not proving it in court? It is all hearsay. If you prove to me legally then I will believe it. But again even Trump's magical legal team can't prove any of the allegations. Its too bad ya'll are blinded by Trump and his lies to boost his ego and is selfish to the American people. This is worse than the Clinton supporters crying in 2016.
Agree with Garmel. If you are going to question someone's credibility, you should know basic facts about them - such as their sex.
 
Calm down it was a typing error people
Hey Will, did you know there are sites with search engines, such as duckduckgo.com, where you can go and find out all kinds of information about people. Just type in their name, hit enter and voila! Of course you still have to be careful to pick out the correct person, because sometimes people have the same names.

Glad to be of help.
 
And if any of that is factual and there is any thing illegal why are they not proving it in court?

What makes you think you are so special that you are privvy to all that is going on in these courts? Do you really think the MSM is going to tell you the truth about it?

Calm down it was a typing error people

OK boomer. You don't even know who the hell Sidney Powell is or what she has done.
 
What makes you think you are so special that you are privvy to all that is going on in these courts? Do you really think the MSM is going to tell you the truth about it?



OK boomer. You don't even know who the hell Sidney Powell is or what she has done.
Show me 1 court case that Trump is winning with his "fraud" claims.....waiting

Boomer? Far from it sparky :smile1:
 

Recent Threads

Back
Top