Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The California snowpack is at +162% of average
The 4th-highest ever
How healthy is California snowpack? Snow survey site has 4th-best start to April ever
but maybe we should stop drilling alarmism into them.
We had to study this guys’s book the population bomb when I was in high school.They been doing this a long time
We had to study this guys’s book the population bomb when I was in high school.
And it's outrageous that a high schooler had such blatantly political ******** drilled into him at taxpayer expense. Your teacher should be horsewhipped.
A new study conducted by a Finnish research team has found little evidence to support the idea of man-made climate change. The results of the study were soon corroborated by researchers in Japan.
In a paper published late last month, entitled ‘No experimental evidence for the significant anthropogenic climate change’, a team of scientists at Turku University in Finland determined that current climate models fail to take into account the effects of cloud coverage on global temperatures, causing them to overestimate the impact of human-generated greenhouse gasses.
The galactic cosmic ray theory has been around for a long time. I wonder what the authors write to advance the idea beyond calculating more precisely how much impact it could have on global temps.
Not familiar with the galactic cosmic ray theory. The authors of this paper argue that current models are inadequate because they do not properly account for the changes in low cloud cover. They argue that after accounting for low cloud cover changes, the increase in CO2 has a much lower influence on observed temperature increases. Furthermore, since the majority of the CO2 emissions come from the ocean, the man-made contribution to global warming is negligible.The galactic cosmic ray theory has been around for a long time. I wonder what the authors write to advance the idea beyond calculating more precisely how much impact it could have on global temps.
Sorry if you missed the connection. Cosmic rays seed cloud cover. Thus, more cosmic rays means more cloud cover. Cosmic rays are affected by the sun’s corona. Stronger sun means less cosmic rays hitting the earth and less cloud cover.Not familiar with the galactic cosmic ray theory. The authors of this paper argue that current models are inadequate because they do not properly account for the changes in low cloud cover. They argue that after accounting for low cloud cover changes, the increase in CO2 has a much lower influence on observed temperature increases. Furthermore, since the majority of the CO2 emissions come from the ocean, the man-made contribution to global warming is negligible.
Here is a direct link to their paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf
Thanks for that. They did not mention the theory in the paper. In any case, they made interesting points. I'm sure the Climate change folks will give it due consideration.Sorry if you missed the connection. Cosmic rays seed cloud cover. Thus, more cosmic rays means more cloud cover. Cosmic rays are affected by the sun’s corona. Stronger sun means less cosmic rays hitting the earth and less cloud cover.
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC