Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

Sidney Powell and Lin Wood are arguing that the didn't actually sign "the Kraken" lawsuit but their electronic signatures are clearly on the filings. It's possible a local attorney threw them on but their public statements sure made it appear they were involved. That's what has this judge fired up.

I could buy that defense if they had acted like it was true. Why didn't they raise that issue BEFORE the cases turned to crap?
 
Being in favor of ending the Fed, stopping election fraud dead in it’s tracks, using the military if there is no SC solution, basically following the constitution of the US is not anti semite. I will not be trapped by that straw man. The Rothschild’s have done more damage to Europe than anything I can think of. Just be patient as one by one these ideas get proven true. Who knows how long it takes.
 
Being in favor of ending the Fed, stopping election fraud dead in it’s tracks, using the military if there is no SC solution, basically following the constitution of the US is not anti semite. I will not be trapped by that straw man. The Rothschild’s have done more damage to Europe than anything I can think of. Just be patient as one by one these ideas get proven true. Who knows how long it takes.
The problem as I see it is this. Regardless of the outcome of this "audit". Due to the fact that they brought in the three stooges to audit an election, the OUBubba's of the world will never trust what they say. And, on the flip side, if an elected official in this world that is a Republican does not concur with the "stolen election" myth, the AC's of the world write them off as part of the deep state.

Still waiting for the outcome of the bamboo analysis.
 
Due to the fact that they brought in the three stooges to audit an election, the OUBubba's of the world will never trust what they say.

They aren't stooges. The problem is that you're being fed BS and you're lapping it up.
 
Last edited:
Agreed his mind is already made up, that’s being very open. Can’t even have a conversation with someone like that.
 
So, nothing on the bamboo yet?

Have they released a report yet? The media went nuts with this but this isn't what they're primarily looking for. Even the auditors are not sold on the bamboo story. It's probably not true. Witnesses in Arizona stated that they encountered ballots that weren't of the same quality of paper as the other ones. They felt different than the other ballots. The auditors are looking primarily for xeroxed ballots.
 
Have they released a report yet? The media went nuts with this but this isn't what they're primarily looking for. Even the auditors are not sold on the bamboo story. It's probably not true. Witnesses in Arizona stated that they encountered ballots that weren't of the same quality of paper as the other ones. They felt different than the other ballots. The auditors are looking primarily for xeroxed ballots.
No, they are saying that ballots were shipped in from China and chinese paper is made from bamboo. So, they're looking for evidence of bamboo fibers. Come on, keep up!
 
No, they are saying that ballots were shipped in from China and chinese paper is made from bamboo. So, they're looking for evidence of bamboo fibers. Come on, keep up!

The auditors themselves are not sold on the China bamboo story. They're looking at it but they don't believe it's real. There's an article from Husker here somewhere that discusses that. They are much more concerned with copied ballots than bamboo. Ken Bennett, the audit liaison, said that they noticed 52 people voted from a two bedroom house. Did this person who did this order Chinese ballots or got a ballot and made copies of it? The latter is much likely to have happened.

Sorry, I listen to what the auditors say, not what the media says.

Not saying it's impossible that bamboo is there, just not likely.
 
Last edited:
The problem as I see it is this. Regardless of the outcome of this "audit". Due to the fact that they brought in the three stooges to audit an election, the OUBubba's of the world will never trust what they say. And, on the flip side, if an elected official in this world that is a Republican does not concur with the "stolen election" myth, the AC's of the world write them off as part of the deep state.

Still waiting for the outcome of the bamboo analysis.
The OU Bubbas of the world are easily influenced. They are known as useful idiots. However, even an idiot can be right about an issue now and then. Instead of ad hominem attacks, which are useless, wait until the report is published. If fraud is discovered, look at the facts and then make a decision.
 
The auditors themselves are not sold on the China bamboo story. They're looking at it but they don't believe it's real. There's an article from Husker here somewhere that discusses that. They are much more concerned with copied ballots than bamboo. Ken Bennett, the audit liaison, said that they noticed 52 people voted from a two bedroom house. Did this person who did this order Chinese ballots or got a ballot and made copies of it? The latter is much likely to have happened.

Sorry, I listen to what the auditors say, not what the media says.

Not saying it's impossible that bamboo is there, just not likely.
I'd say it's more likely that 52 people used one address as their home address and someone coordinated the activity. That could be fraud related to a local election but having no impact on a national one. That's where most proven fraud is found, at the local level to get someone's uncle elected as a county commissioner or to a town council seat and it's not related to "party".
 
I'd say it's more likely that 52 people used one address as their home address and someone coordinated the activity. That could be fraud related to a local election but having no impact on a national one. That's where most proven fraud is found, at the local level to get someone's uncle elected as a county commissioner or to a town council seat and it's not related to "party".
You would say that, but like everything else you say you have no basis to support your decision making. Take the "dossier" for instance.
 
I'd say it's more likely that 52 people used one address as their home address and someone coordinated the activity. That could be fraud related to a local election but having no impact on a national one. That's where most proven fraud is found, at the local level to get someone's uncle elected as a county commissioner or to a town council seat and it's not related to "party".

It was not a local one. This audit team isn't looking at the local elections.
 
Agreed his mind is already made up, that’s being very open. Can’t even have a conversation with someone like that.

We're talking about "using the military" if there is no "Supreme Court solution." We're in full-blown wingnut territory. Do you think his mind isn't made up?
 
I think the right husker identified them as stooges.

Seems like all of the states that have come to see the audit say otherwise. Doing work for the DoD shows that the government thinks they're good.

MSM narratives, bud.
 
I think the right husker identified them as stooges.

Stooges was correct. In August this team with NO election experience will issue a report on their election audit. They'll certainly find election procedure mishaps while not acknowledging their own audit mishaps. Has there ever been an election audit that found that an election was perfect?

It will become a finger pointing exercise further diminishing confidence in the election integrity for the R base which is ultimately what they want, because they came in with an agenda that the election was stolen so every mishap will be viewed with that lens. Every election oddity will be pointed to as "cheating" without regard for whether the oddity benefited R's or D's.
 
Last edited:
Garm
No leftist wants to question why so many states have gone to Az to see how it is being done,
Wonder why

Well, there's been enough leaked info that we know what happened in AZ. The states wouldn't be going there if something wasn't found. A lot that will be found there will be indisputable and watching these libs on here squirm will be quite enjoyable. I guess they'll find comfort in more MSM disinformation I guess.
 


Presidents of countries want to adopt a better monetary system. Instead of calling them or me names. Maybe just look into why that is. I am doing extremely well owning businesses in Bitcoin. I have freedom like never before. You people need to look into this like I did. I am just using this platform to help people. I give away free blogs everyday on my twitter account. www.neutralatm.com. I don't get all the negativity. As far as the military is concerned. Military Generals are saying that and lawyers with 40 years of legal experience. Why would I believe Rachel Madow or Wolf Blitzer over Michael Flynn, Mike Pompeo, Dan Bongino, or Sydney Powell? Some people want to watch CNN, fine it's a free country. Not for me.
 
Well, there's been enough leaked info that we know what happened in AZ. The states wouldn't be going there if something wasn't found. A lot that will be found there will be indisputable and watching these libs on here squirm will be quite enjoyable. I guess they'll find comfort in more MSM disinformation I guess.

Can we step back for a moment and admit it's not "states" going there? It's not like Vermont is sending a bipartisan delegation to see how it's done. It's Republicans at the behest of their constituents who, like most of this board, believe that the audit is going to confirm suspicions about fraud.
 
Can we step back for a moment and admit it's not "states" going there? It's not like Vermont is sending a bipartisan delegation to see how it's done. It's Republicans at the behest of their constituents who, like most of this board, believe that the audit is going to confirm suspicions about fraud.

Yeah, like you could ever find dems to come along with the republicans to go there. The fact is these republicans do represent the people as you said. They are official representatives of their state. You're playing a word salad game that I'm not interested participating in.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, like you could ever find dems to come along with the republicans to go there. The fact is these republicans do represent the people as you said. They are official representatives of their state. You're playing a word salad game that I'm not interesting in participating in.

The 26 pages of this thread have been a word salad game about what an "audit" is and is not. This isn't an exercise in truth, as the GOP-led Maricopa County Board has plainly stated several times. It's an exercise in how to best undermine trust, and Republicans are the ones who want to "learn" how to do it. "States" aren't doing this.
 
The 26 pages of this thread have been a word salad game about what an "audit" is and is not. This isn't an exercise in truth, as the GOP-led Maricopa County Board has plainly stated several times. It's an exercise in how to best undermine trust, and Republicans are the ones who want to "learn" how to do it. "States" aren't doing this.

You mean the Maricopa Board who distorted what Ben Cotton said? The same Board who said that sensitive records (lol!) were stored in the routers and that's why they can't turn them over? The same Board who wouldn't go under oath at a mandatory meeting (they wouldn't show up) but the audit team did show up and went under oath? The same Board who won't tell the audit team where the adjudicated missing ballots are at? The same Board who won't turn over the chain of custody documents?

I'm pretty certain I know what the truth is and it's not coming from this Board.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, like you could ever find dems to come along with the republicans to go there. The fact is these republicans do represent the people as you said. They are official representatives of their state. You're playing a word salad game that I'm not interested participating in.
GOP elected officials who were elected IN THIS ELECTION that are in charge of future elections are dubious of this whole thing. They have no reason to do anything but what is right.
 
You mean the Maricopa Board who distorted what Ben Johnson said? The same Board who said that sensitive records (lol!) were stored in the routers and that's why they can't turn them over? The same Board who wouldn't go under oath at a mandatory meeting (they wouldn't show up) but the audit team did show up and went under oath? The same Board who won't tell the audit team where the missing ballots are at?

I'm pretty certain I know what the truth is and it's not coming from this Board.

Yeah that's what a quick Yandex search taught me too.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top