Forensic Audit in Maricopa County, AZ

Seattle Husker said:
That's what has me confused. Antrim County was won by Trump with 61% of the votes. This was validated by the hand count of ballots. The only reason to be looking at Antrim County is because of that now infamous switch of votes from Biden to Trump which was corrected the night of the election and was attributed human error.

Keep in mind, the Antrim County case has been closed and is no longer being audited.

It boggles the mind that random twitter poster claims are posted as "fact".
Click to expand...

The election people screwed up, so it's fair to criticize them. However, the error was found and corrected. Might I wonder if the outcome had been wildly unexpected? Perhaps, but it came out about the same as it did in 2016. Honestly, I don't even see much reason to be suspicious.
 
Mr. Deez said:
The election people screwed up, so it's fair to criticize them. However, the error was found and corrected. Might I wonder if the outcome had been wildly unexpected? Perhaps, but it came out about the same as it did in 2016. Honestly, I don't even see much reason to be suspicious.
Click to expand...

The county election officials screwed up and quickly corrected the mistake in a public way. Mistakes are GOING to happen. Hold them accountable but this is the system working well rather than grounds for suspicion.

Keep in mind, I'm anti-Trump and still support the process that accidentally flipped X votes to Biden then rightfully corrected them to Trump.
 
Seattle Husker said:
Keep in mind, I'm anti-Trump and still support the process that accidentally flipped X votes to Biden then rightfully corrected them to Trump.
Click to expand...

At least you admit you are part of what is broken with the system...you didn't vote FOR someone in the office. Very few people actually voted FOR President Mush for Brains Biden. They voted against mean tweets, self-interests be damned...
 
mb227 said:
At least you admit you are part of what is broken with the system...you didn't vote FOR someone in the office. Very few people actually voted FOR President Mush for Brains Biden. They voted against mean tweets, self-interests be damned...
Click to expand...

I voted FOR Biden as the salve that our country desperately needed compared the divider. Wasn't my first choice but unlike in 2016 where I held my nose and voted for HRC, I didn't need to hold my nose this time.
 
Seattle Husker said:
I voted FOR Biden as the salve that our country desperately needed compared the divider. Wasn't my first choice but unlike in 2016 where I held my nose and voted for HRC, I didn't need to hold my nose this time.
Click to expand...
And yet Biden has royally screwed up the nation, dividing it far more than Mr. Mean Tweets ever did. Your choice is the reason your grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren's children will be suckling at the government teet and paying outrageous taxes while the citizens of today see the immediate impacts of inflation and poor government policies from the federal government. You voted in the candidate that promises to fill the hands of people with even more government hand-outs...
 
mb227 said:
And yet Biden has royally screwed up the nation, dividing it far more than Mr. Mean Tweets ever did. Your choice is the reason your grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren's children will be suckling at the government teet and paying outrageous taxes while the citizens of today see the immediate impacts of inflation and poor government policies from the federal government. You voted in the candidate that promises to fill the hands of people with even more government hand-outs...
Click to expand...

Thanks you for your feedback. Recognizing that this thread was intended to be focused on the Maricopa audits I'm going to simply leave it there and focus on the thread topic. I see at least 2 other threads devoted to **** flinging at anything the Biden Admin does. Please feel free to blast away in those threads though I don't often read them.
 
Personally, I believe the Biden Harris regime will end this year or very early 2022. If we don’t fix the corrupt voting integrity in the US. It won’t be worth living in, by 2030. We’ll see what happens. I truly want to be buried here. It’s my country! But, I won’t be a Ward of the State.
 
AC said:
Election Audits Explained
Click to expand...

Summary: Let me convince the viewer that a "Full Forensic audit" is a thing and it's needed. It started with a statisitic pulled out of their rear end: "Let's make the extremely optimistic assumption that the election accuracy is 85%" based purely on some IRS correlation that tax payer compliance is 85%.

upload_2021-6-10_16-47-8.png


What does that number pulled our of their arse translate to? 24,000,000 suspect votes! Fun with numbers!

"That's a sobering thought" says the narrator who goes on to say "the conclusion cannot be dismissed without a Forensic Audit." Following along closely they took an IRS tax payer compliance rate...applied it blindly to election accuracy and say [the viewer] cannot dismiss that statistic without a forensic audit. Yes, yes you can because it's literally a made up statistic that the video maker told the viewer to "imagine".

That's it. That's the 100% full justification for a Forensic Audit which is even less than AZ Senate used.

They go on to try to define a Full Forensic Audit but the definition they choose to use is clearly self-serving to try and claim that all the other audits don't address which they don't actually show how they don't address them.

In fact, they go on to say we need to ASSUME there are many bad actors because there is "no scientific proof" of the claim that the election was the most secure in US history. See what they did there? They flipped the argument from "prove a crime was done" to "prove there was no crime". Want to know why 70+ cases were thrown out? Our court system doesn't operate on guilty until proven innocent claims which is exactly what this video is trying to convince the viewer needs to happen. That's my challenge with the entire BS. There is millions of dollars and apparently 29% of Republicans lining up to pay to audit based on a theory...a made up statistic, that the election was wildly inaccurate and many bad actors were involved. It's a conspiracy in search of evidence to justify it. Random internet posters pulling "facts" from the backside and people like @AC running with it because they want to believe it.

Keep in mind, this entire fracas is based on made up statistics claiming vote accuracy is abhorrent (85%...which is "optimistic). If that statistic is invalid, which we know this video made up, then the house of cards comes crashing down.
 
Last edited:
Seattle Husker said:
Summary: Let me convince the viewer that a "Full Forensic audit" is a thing and it's needed. It started with a statisitic pulled out of their rear end: "Let's make the extremely optimistic assumption that the election accuracy is 85%" based purely on some IRS correlation that tax payer compliance is 85%.

upload_2021-6-10_16-47-8.png


What does that number pulled our of their arse translate to? 24,000,000 suspect votes! Fun with numbers!

"That's a sobering thought" says the narrator who goes on to say "the conclusion cannot be dismissed without a Forensic Audit." Following along closely they took an IRS tax payer compliance rate...applied it blindly to election accuracy and say [the viewer] cannot dismiss that statistic without a forensic audit. Yes, yes you can because it's literally a made up statistic that the video maker told the viewer to "imagine".

That's it. That's the 100% full justification for a Forensic Audit which is even less than AZ Senate used.

They go on to try to define a Full Forensic Audit but the definition they choose to use is clearly self-serving to try and claim that all the other audits don't address which they don't actually show how they don't address them.

In fact, they go on to say we need to ASSUME there are many bad actors because there is "no scientific proof" of the claim that the election was the most secure in US history. See what they did there? They flipped the argument from "prove a crime was done" to "prove there was no crime". Want to know why 70+ cases were thrown out? Our court system doesn't operate on guilty until proven innocent claims which is exactly what this video is trying to convince the viewer needs to happen. That's my challenge with the entire BS. There is millions of dollars and apparently 29% of Republicans lining up to pay to audit based on a theory...a made up statistic, that the election was wildly inaccurate and many bad actors were involved. It's a conspiracy in search of evidence to justify it. Random internet posters pulling "facts" from the backside and people like @AC running with it because they want to believe it.

Keep in mind, this entire fracas is based on made up statistics claiming vote accuracy is abhorrent (85%...which is "optimistic). If that statistic is invalid, which we know this video made up, then the house of cards comes crashing down.
Click to expand...
I have to agree with the lib on this one. There is little correlation between those that pay taxes and those that vote for Democrats.
 
They have 14K hours of video they are going through. Once this is revealed. Expect many other states to begin forensic audits. Expect a nationwide internet shutdown too, while your at it. Cause it's comin!
 
I never knew the level of scrutiny and security of this audit until reading this article. The key points are pasted below.

The Devastating Reality of the Arizona Forensic Audit

"Before a person can even enter the premises, their name must be on a pre-approved list. After winding their way through a maze of corridors, they arrive at a security checkpoint where their ID is checked.

From that point forward, visitors are escorted at all times by audit personnel.

After being briefed, visitors must forfeit cell phones, cameras, and any writing implements they might be carrying before they can be escorted to the audit floor. That’s why the Democrats’ claims of seeing auditors wielding blue and black pens are so implausible.

On the coliseum floor, the audit is conducted in several stages, each of which takes place in a designated area. The tables in each section are color-coded, and workers wear shirts with corresponding colors, making it easy for anyone to spot if someone strays from their assigned area.

At every table, there is accountability and supervision, all of it live streamed and viewable by the general public.

Just like in a casino, where “pit bosses” keep a close eye on a relatively small section of tables, there is an audit supervisor responsible for groups of two to three tables. If any problems arise or anything appears to be even slightly amiss, the supervisor immediately steps in to address it.

And just as casinos use high-resolution cameras in the ceiling to monitor every single table, the auditors in Arizona labor under the scrutiny of state-of-the-art cameras positioned directly above each table.

Every ballot reviewed by the auditors goes through distinct stages, starting with a simple count. One by one, ballots are placed on rotating stands in the middle of each table, and each one is viewed and counted by three separate people, whose independent tallies must line up. Each batch has 50 ballots, and once all of them are counted they’re boxed, sealed, and marked with the name of each counter, much like an evidence label.

The box is then taken to a locked cage until it is ready for review at the next station.

Next, the ballots undergo digital imagery examination, which is done at such a high resolution that it’s almost better than reviewing the ballot itself, because you can zoom in without losing resolution.

When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark – something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.

After being imaged, the ballots are re-boxed, a new tabulations page is attached, and the box is sent to a different cage. From that point on, the ballots are kept under lock and key, with 24/7 video surveillance."

 
YearOfTheSteer said:
I never knew the level of scrutiny and security of this audit until reading this article. The key points are pasted below.

The Devastating Reality of the Arizona Forensic Audit

"Before a person can even enter the premises, their name must be on a pre-approved list. After winding their way through a maze of corridors, they arrive at a security checkpoint where their ID is checked.

From that point forward, visitors are escorted at all times by audit personnel.

After being briefed, visitors must forfeit cell phones, cameras, and any writing implements they might be carrying before they can be escorted to the audit floor. That’s why the Democrats’ claims of seeing auditors wielding blue and black pens are so implausible.

On the coliseum floor, the audit is conducted in several stages, each of which takes place in a designated area. The tables in each section are color-coded, and workers wear shirts with corresponding colors, making it easy for anyone to spot if someone strays from their assigned area.

At every table, there is accountability and supervision, all of it live streamed and viewable by the general public.

Just like in a casino, where “pit bosses” keep a close eye on a relatively small section of tables, there is an audit supervisor responsible for groups of two to three tables. If any problems arise or anything appears to be even slightly amiss, the supervisor immediately steps in to address it.

And just as casinos use high-resolution cameras in the ceiling to monitor every single table, the auditors in Arizona labor under the scrutiny of state-of-the-art cameras positioned directly above each table.

Every ballot reviewed by the auditors goes through distinct stages, starting with a simple count. One by one, ballots are placed on rotating stands in the middle of each table, and each one is viewed and counted by three separate people, whose independent tallies must line up. Each batch has 50 ballots, and once all of them are counted they’re boxed, sealed, and marked with the name of each counter, much like an evidence label.

The box is then taken to a locked cage until it is ready for review at the next station.

Next, the ballots undergo digital imagery examination, which is done at such a high resolution that it’s almost better than reviewing the ballot itself, because you can zoom in without losing resolution.

When I was there, one of the auditors showed me an example of a ballot that was flagged as suspicious because every single oval was filled out perfectly, without a single stray mark – something that would be easy for a machine to accomplish, but is almost impossible to do by hand.

After being imaged, the ballots are re-boxed, a new tabulations page is attached, and the box is sent to a different cage. From that point on, the ballots are kept under lock and key, with 24/7 video surveillance."
Click to expand...

Good article. This is definitely more informative than the "auditors only counted 35K ballots this week " or "the auditors used the wrong colored pens" fake news stories I've seen here.
 
Horn6721 said:
YoS
Like you I had no idea how it was being done.
Great article. Very credible source
Thanks
Click to expand...

It only took a Trump Pardon to make Bernark Kerik "very credible". :lmao:

In 2010 Kerik pled guilty to 8 felonies. The most concerning charge is that he received $250k of free home renovations from a mob-connected construction company. He also lied during interviews for Homeland Security Director.

Kerik is a Trump supporter. If that alone makes him credible admit it. You can't whitwash his background though.
 
Last edited:
Seattle Husker said:
It only took a Trump Pardon to make Bernark Kerik "very credible". :lmao:

In 2010 Kerik pled guilty to 8 felonies. The most concerning charge is that he received $250k of free home renovations from a mob-connected construction company. He also lied during interviews for Homeland Security Director.

Kerik is a Trump supporter. If that alone makes him credible admit it. You can't whitwash his background though.
Click to expand...
 
Seattle Husker said:
It only took a Trump Pardon to make Bernark Kerik "very credible". :lmao:

In 2010 Kerik pled guilty to 8 felonies. The most concerning charge is that he received $250k of free home renovations from a mob-connected construction company. He also lied during interviews for Homeland Security Director.

Kerik is a Trump supporter. If that alone makes him credible admit it. You can't whitwash his background though.
Click to expand...

Credible or not, he describes in extreme detail the process and level of scrutiny for the audit. If those facts are false, it would get debunked fairly easily and quickly.
 
AC said:
They have 14K hours of video they are going through. Once this is revealed. Expect many other states to begin forensic audits. Expect a nationwide internet shutdown too, while your at it. Cause it's comin!
Click to expand...

There won't be a shutdown of the internet but it wouldn't surprise me if social media censored any news that showed fraud was proven.
 
Garmel said:
There won't be a shutdown of the internet but it wouldn't surprise me if social media censored any news that showed fraud was proven.
Click to expand...
That's like saying that the gypsy you pay $25 to find out if your dead father wants to tell you anything is going to "get in touch with" your dead father. It's all but a certainty. Hammer's find nails. If you want to find a UFO call this guy.
7MZYBRWHFFBVPF2UFOLIJUPQN4.jpg
 
OUBubba said:
That's like saying that the gypsy you pay $25 to find out if your dead father wants to tell you anything is going to "get in touch with" your dead father. It's all but a certainty. Hammer's find nails. If you want to find a UFO call this guy.
7MZYBRWHFFBVPF2UFOLIJUPQN4.jpg
Click to expand...

From the Blue Anon poster who hasn't been right about anything. I remember putting up with this same **** from you MSM bots during the FBI malfeasance time period. I will be right again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Recent Threads

Back
Top