OUBubba
5,000+ Posts
That's such a crock and really highlights that you have nothing reasonable to respond.What's the problem there? It was Lincoln and the Republican party that freed all the slaves from southern Democrat plantation owners.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's such a crock and really highlights that you have nothing reasonable to respond.What's the problem there? It was Lincoln and the Republican party that freed all the slaves from southern Democrat plantation owners.
If anyone would know about lacking reasonable responses, it would be those posters on this site from Mobilhoma...maybe you should ask...oh wait. Yeah. You already know...That's such a crock and really highlights that you have nothing reasonable to respond.
Really? Are you telling me Abraham Lincoln wasn't a Republican? Or are you telling me he and his party wasn't responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation?That's such a crock and really highlights that you have nothing reasonable to respond.
He's too busy admiring Manchin for not always blindly following the other Dems.Really? Are you telling me Abraham Lincoln wasn't a Republican? Or are you telling me he and his party wasn't responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation?
I'm saying that the Republicans of those days were NOT the Republicans of today. The response to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and associated things such as the Southern Strategy migrated the GOP to what they are today. Using the Republican heritage of Lincoln to apply to today is as silly as referring to Whigs/Tories or me calling for DKR stadium to be painted crimson because he was a Sooner from Hollis. You're better than that. mb's not, but you are.Really? Are you telling me Abraham Lincoln wasn't a Republican? Or are you telling me he and his party wasn't responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation?
This weak *** **** pulled you out? Come on man!He's too busy admiring Manchin for not always blindly following the other Dems.
I'm saying that the Republicans of those days were NOT the Republicans of today. The response to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and associated things such as the Southern Strategy migrated the GOP to what they are today. Using the Republican heritage of Lincoln to apply to today is as silly as referring to Whigs/Tories or me calling for DKR stadium to be painted crimson because he was a Sooner from Hollis. You're better than that. mb's not, but you are.
Don't be daft. The parties switched poles between Lincoln and FDR. The pushback from the Civil Rights Act and the 50 year pro-life movement have migrated red states to Republican. Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama had conservative Democratic politicians.Someone remind me. Which party had the most votes Against the Civil Rights Act.
In the House it was
Demx 152 for 96 against
Reps 138 34
Senate
Demx 46 21
Rep 27 6
That is a whole lot of Demx against equality for blacks.
Maybe someone needs to remind The race hustlers
Don't be daft. The parties switched poles between Lincoln and FDR. The pushback from the Civil Rights Act and the 50 year pro-life movement have migrated red states to Republican. Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama had conservative Democratic politicians.
Oh no. This is where we'll hear that the parties somehow switched platforms in the 60s. Lincoln would have been a democrat today dont cha know.
Don't be daft. The parties switched poles between Lincoln and FDR. The pushback from the Civil Rights Act and the 50 year pro-life movement have migrated red states to Republican. Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama had conservative Democratic politicians.
I also challenge the assumption that few to no teachers want to arm themselves. If I was a teacher and saw that video, I would be training with my Sig every weekend.What I find remarkable about this is that the Left views this as discrediting the "good guy with a gun" mentality. The exact opposite is the logical conclusion. It discredits the idea that individuals should disarm and rely on the police to protect them.
Lunacy.
Still there.And it looks like your boy in DC didn't have enough balls to keep his tweet up, so maybe he found out the Republicans were voting against yet another non-sensical and wasteful spending bill proposed by Democratx.
You do the work. Here it is. Text - H.R.6538 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Active Shooter Alert Act of 2022I know nothing about this bill, but often it gets voted down due to what is attached to the bill that is completely unrelated.
Funny. When I replied, it said "tweet not available"Still there.
I'm not going to do this dance. It's something that someone wanted to do in an effort to save lives. You know, innocent children. Even the white ones. Here's what an actual groomer thinks about it: Matt Gaetz says active shooter alert law designed to cause ‘hate’ of Second AmendmentBubba in your opinion What would be the purpose of a nationwide actuve shooter alert?
I scanned it and did not see anything attached that is secondary to the bill. Like others have stated already, I’m not sure what that accomplishes other than potential panic by some in the population. So many Amber alerts already go off in big cities, I think a lot of people ignore them.You do the work. Here it is. Text - H.R.6538 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Active Shooter Alert Act of 2022
* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC