Exactly. Trump followed whatever his Covid-19 team said to do. Unfortunately, as you mentioned, they were fed ******** by China.
Honestly, I don't know if he followed his team or not. Here's what I do know. First, the Chinese government fed ******** to everybody with the enabling and endorsement of the WHO, and it adversely affected the responses of everybody in the world. They are the chief villains in this, and efforts to suggest otherwise are self-centered acts of political bad faith.
Second, I know that the Democrats would have handled this slower and worse than Trump did. They made that clear with their public statements at the time.
Third, I know that 14 countries have worse death rates than the US (and most of them are MUCH worse). (Realistically, 16 probably do, because China and Iran are almost surely lying about their numbers.) Almost all of these countries have national healthcare systems that are frequently touted as superior to ours. If we handled this so badly and if their systems are so good, why are we doing so much better than they are?
Fourth, I know that letting states take the lead isn't a bad idea and isn't a cop-out. Those who say it is or that it reflects incompetence are dumbasses who don't understand our federal system. The federal government is one of limited jurisdiction and powers. It can't do what state governments can do in terms healthcare delivery and regulation, restricting commerce, and restricting movement. I've heard people whining that we don't have a national stay-at-home order. It's because that would be un-*******-constitutional and blatantly so and on multiple levels. Trump is a President, not a king.
And by the way, we're better off having things handled at the state level, because they are closer to the problem and therefore understand it better in context and because each state and municipality has different needs. What's needed in New York City is wildly different from what's needed in Buford, Wyoming.
Of course, we could all just be like liberals and decide that the Constitution is a "living document" and that we don't care what it says if it interferes with our policy goal. Ok, fine. We wipe our *** with the Constitution, tell the founding fathers to **** themselves, and enact a Nazi-style federal shutdown. Who the hell is going to enforce this law? Remember from the sanctuary cities debate, we're not allowed to compel local police to enforce or even assist in the enforcement of federal laws. (In fact, some on the Left think it's ok for state officials to affirmatively undermine the enforcement of federal laws.) The feds have to do it themselves. So raise for hand if you're ready to turn the FBI from a relatively small agency of about 14,000 agents into a monstrosity with several hundred thousand officers patrolling neighborhoods throughout the United States - a task they've never done in history and in which they have no expertise? Or maybe we should just leave this sort of things to governors and mayors.