Coronavirus

Appeal to authority because you can’t think for yourself - the very definition of a liberal.
Motherscratcher, the two screenshots (off of WIKIPEDIA mind you - liberals get fed a line of **** for daring to reference a wikipedia link) that you posted had rankings of each state by density. Those are your screenshots put forward to prove me wrong. Correct?

Jeez this is stupid stuff. As stupid as FOP's not faciliating their members getting vaccinated. COVID is the leading killer of cops in the last 18 months, not MS-13, antifa, or LCN.
 
When your argument is empirically proven wrong you say the argument is stupid...of course.
Dude, my argument is accurate unless google, statistica, wikipedia, the census link that garmel shared, et al are all wrong. I don't know who computes population density but they almost all back up my point. But, sure, keep ******* that chicken.
 
“You have seen Merrick Garland performing live, I don’t think he’s ever going to prosecute him,” Paul continued,

“Democrats love Dr. Fauci so much that they will not have one hearing to investigate the origins of this virus,” Paul urged, adding “It’s hard with President Biden to know whether it’s corruption or incompetence.”
I guess I'm not getting it. If Paul keeps grilling Fauci, aren't those hearings? But, I get the rest of the point, and it is what I said. Dims and Rs won't hold people accountable. Only Dims do, and that is against Rs.
 
Dude, my argument is accurate unless google, statistica, wikipedia, the census link that garmel shared, et al are all wrong. I don't know who computes population density but they almost all back up my point. But, sure, keep ******* that chicken.

How does my link prove you right?

Bubba, you can compute population density yourself. It's not hard.
 
But the stats you cited regarding population density were demonstrated to be wrong. **** happens. You looked up a flawed stat on a website.
A. The differences were nominal - either way. Racial demographics would have a larger impact. Not as large as, you know, VACCINATIONS.
B. I looked up the first 8 links. 7/8 were in sync with me. That includes the US Census link that garmel posted to prove me wrong.
 
A. The differences were nominal - either way. Racial demographics would have a larger impact. Not as large as, you know, VACCINATIONS.
B. I looked up the first 8 links. 7/8 were in sync with me. That includes the US Census link that garmel posted to prove me wrong.

The census link I gave did not agree with you.
 
Let's try another source. This is official government census data. Historical Population Density Data (1910-2020)

2020

Alabama at 99.2

Vermont at 69.8

Both in square miles.
This is how we have gotten into this maricopa ********. From you link above.

Alabama:
Resident population: 5,024,279
Population density: 99.2
Density rank: 29

Vermont:
Resident population: 643,033
Population density: 69.8
Density rank: 33

The MOST dense - DC - so as to establish which number = more dense...
Resident population: 689,545
Population density: 11,280.0
Density rank: 1 - so a lower density rank = MORE DENSE

We can argue about if the known world is calculating population density different than the right wing circle jerk at hornfans. We can postulate that maybe I'm the pivot man in said circle. However, what is inarguable is that your link highlights the facts that you claim that it does.

Regardless, putting this much effort trying to prove me wrong on the difference between 33 and 29 in population density is like debating on which climate is better, Ft. Worth or Dallas.

Diabetes at 15% compared to 8% is more relevant. Vermont is older by a few years. 43 v. 39.
 
This is how we have gotten into this maricopa ********. From you link above.

Alabama:
Resident population: 5,024,279
Population density: 99.2
Density rank: 29

Vermont:
Resident population: 643,033
Population density: 69.8
Density rank: 33

The MOST dense - DC - so as to establish which number = more dense...
Resident population: 689,545
Population density: 11,280.0
Density rank: 1 - so a lower density rank = MORE DENSE

We can argue about if the known world is calculating population density different than the right wing circle jerk at hornfans. We can postulate that maybe I'm the pivot man in said circle. However, what is inarguable is that your link highlights the facts that you claim that it does.

Regardless, putting this much effort trying to prove me wrong on the difference between 33 and 29 in population density is like debating on which climate is better, Ft. Worth or Dallas.

Diabetes at 15% compared to 8% is more relevant. Vermont is older by a few years. 43 v. 39.

The difference between number 29 and 33 is 99.2 per sq/mile for Alabama and 69.8 per sq/mile for Vermont on the Census stats. That's a considerable difference. Your Statista stat has it at 217.52 residents per square mile for Vermont compared to 97.18 for Alabama. That's 3x the difference between 69.8 and 217.52. If you can't understand how wrong you are then I can't help you.
 
upload_2021-11-2_17-10-5.jpeg
 
The difference between number 29 and 33 is 99.2 per sq/mile for Alabama and 69.8 per sq/mile for Vermont on the Census stats. That's a considerable difference. Your Statista stat has it at 217.52 residents per square mile for Vermont compared to 97.18 for Alabama. That's 3x the difference between 69.8 and 217.52. If you can't understand how wrong you are then I can't help you.
Those rankings are from. Your. Link. Is the WiFi tough at dealey plaza?
 
Those rankings are from. Your. Link. Is the WiFi tough at dealey plaza?

Holy ****. Are you really this thick? Number 29 in the nation is at 99.2 for Alabama. Number 33 in the nation is at 69.8. That's roughly a 50% difference. I know you're an Okie but what part of this do you not understand?

99.2 Alabama sq/mile

69.8 Vermont sq/mile

I'll say it again. That's roughly a 50% difference. What part of this do you not understand? I'll type slower for you if you need me to.
 
I compared the two and duck told me it was a ludicrous comparison because of population density. That's all.
Plus ethic background. Vermont, the left’s current favorite state to compare all others to, is 95% white, while blacks have generally terrible health as a group, as Honkey forces them to eat junk and be overweight.

Look, after 11 months or so of the Wuhan vaccines being used, the results tend to show it works well to minimize the effects of the virus. It’s not total protection and you can still die from the Wuhan even if vaccinated - as Colin Powell did, who had a list of other health problems.

If a person is in an age/health conditions where they would have a high risk of croaking from the Wuhan, it’s a good choice for them. If they’re 6 and have about as close to zero chance of dying from it as statistically possible, with unknown birth defect or other long term health effects, it’s dumb. Even worse that it’s being forced.
 
Last edited:
Plus ethic background. Vermont, the left’s current favorite state to compare all others to, is 95% white, while blacks have generally terrible health as a group, as Honkey forces them to eat junk and be overweight.

Look, after 11 months or so of the Wuhan vaccines being used, the results tend to show it works well to minimize the effects of the virus. It’s not total protection and you can still die from the Wuhan even if vaccinated - as Colin Powell did, who had a list of other health problems.

If a person is in an age/health conditions where they would have a high risk of croaking from the Wuhan, it’s a good choice for them. If they’re 6 and have about as close to zero chance of dying from it as statistically possible, with unknown birth defect or other long term health effects, it’s dumb. Even worse that it’s being forced.
I only used Vermont because it closely matched the vaccination % of Japan. And, yes, I stepped on my wee wee to some extent.

I'm not aware of anyone forcing children to get it. Hell, I'm as pro-vacc as they come and I'm on the fence with my 6 year old. As it stands now, I'm saying no.

PS: those last two paragraphs were reasoned and, except for that last sentence, a Democrat could have written it. Did you get up and go to the bathroom and your wife took over the keyboard for a bit?
 
Then you’d have to take your kid out of public school in a state run by Democrats. Vaccine mandates are coming for all students now that the FDA has rubber stamped it.
 
Then you’d have to take your kid out of public school in a state run by Democrats. Vaccine mandates are coming for all students now that the FDA has rubber stamped it.
I doubt that. But, hey maybe we can use this along with CRT to scare white parents.
 
I doubt that. But, hey maybe we can use this along with CRT to scare white parents.
You REALLY still want to run with that after McAuliffe showed you don't eff with mama bear and tell the parents that they should have no say in the education of their children? Have you SEEN the results in Virginia?

I guarantee you that and even New Jersey should be serving as a wake-up call for a lot of people with a D next to their name. Some of what has helped in New Jersey IS the pushback against Murphy's totalitarianism related to the sniffles.

And now we ALSO get to see if Adams rescinds the stupidity of DeBlasio in New York...
 
Saying “no” to a vaccine after railing on it for nearly a year seems- how to nicely say it - hypocritical.
Declining a vaccine for a 6 year old who spent two weeks in a home with positive people and never got it is hypocritical? I think every adult should get it. My kids got theirs on their own. I called you reasonable and fair in another thread. Don't ruin what we have.
 
You REALLY still want to run with that after McAuliffe showed you don't eff with mama bear and tell the parents that they should have no say in the education of their children? Have you SEEN the results in Virginia?

I guarantee you that and even New Jersey should be serving as a wake-up call for a lot of people with a D next to their name. Some of what has helped in New Jersey IS the pushback against Murphy's totalitarianism related to the sniffles.

And now we ALSO get to see if Adams rescinds the stupidity of DeBlasio in New York...
Well, you're right that preying on fear and racism sells much better than good policy. Watch for your next MS-13/immigrant caravan flare up between now and the mid terms.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top