I have not watched any corporate news for almost 3 years, so I am out of the talking points loop, but I decided to watch the debate. Anyway, I am kind of a neutral conservative . Ramaswamy improved himself the most. No political experience, with the benefits and detriments that brings. Basically, a younger and more honest Trump. Trump, though, as someone who had “no experience,” actually had phenomenal experience all around the world for decades in many diverse industries, and had dealt with all sorts of political decision makers at all levels of government, local and abroad. Ramaswamy is painfully young still. Very talented, though.
I suppose VP would be a realistic next step for him, but if an anti-Trump snowball takes over in the R party, he could handle the rest of those guys on stage (as a primary candidate, and who knows, with a peculiar youth movement and Asian energy, could beat a weak Biden). Still, I do not think he has the experience to take on the swamp as an outsider, or handle foreign policy, at that age. I guess I would be willing to risk it, given the poor options, sort of like Trump, whose negatives were on the table from the beginning.
