She had 10 points, 6 steals, and 5 rebounds against Texas in Austin.In looking at her stats against Texas, they were inefficient. Remind me why she is coveted.
17 points, 5 rebounds, 4 steals in Stillwater.
Guess you have high standards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She had 10 points, 6 steals, and 5 rebounds against Texas in Austin.In looking at her stats against Texas, they were inefficient. Remind me why she is coveted.
She played well against us. I'd say Vic knows what he's specifically looking for and why.She had 10 points, 6 steals, and 5 rebounds against Texas in Austin.
17 points, 5 rebounds, 4 steals in Stillwater.
Guess you have high standards.
For sure. And, let's face it; she did not have a lot of talent around her at OSU as the team finished 9-20. I think she'd do great as a two-guard / wing on a team with more offensive talent (like Texas).She played well against us. I'd say Vic knows what he's specifically looking for and why.
In looking at her stats against Texas, they were inefficient. Remind me why she is coveted.
I thought Texas had entered into her recruitment late but I can’t find anything concrete.
She had 10 points, 6 steals, and 5 rebounds against Texas in Austin.
17 points, 5 rebounds, 4 steals in Stillwater.
Guess you have high standards.
Elena Lovato liked below tweet:
Why would her minutes decline? She'd be able to possibly play some at SG and SF and perhaps log some of the minutes vacated by Joanne and Audrey.In looking at the “stats” tab if your post, Fields went 6-17 in first game……and 2-10 in second…..against Horns. In a lot of minutes….second game she played 40. Obviously she does other things than shoot. And I now remember her and how hard she plays. I do wonder how she would feel in seeing her minutes decline somewhat. I’m ALL-IN on Fields if Harmon….and Schaefer see her as a good fit.
Not sure if Business ended up being her major at Berkeley; but, Texas does offer a great Business school.In regards to Fatou….looking at her offer list, she obviously has the IQ. Harvard, Rice, Vanderbilt, Cal………they don’t recruit knuckleheads.
With our dribble-drive offense, we need 3 players who have speed and can handle the ball well. Our SF consists of Shay, unproven Kobi, and incoming Ndjakalenga.In regards to why Fields minutes “might” decline…..solely being presumptuous. She averaged 34.7 per game this last year….out of 40. I don’t think she would need to play that much at Texas. I was thinking she would split time as a two guard with Matharu…..with relieving Harmon at times. I am hoping that she wouldn’t have to play the 3 at 5’-9” much. I’m wanting to move on from playing small at that position…..as I “think” we’ll have more size options at wing next season. Schaefer does like experience so Fields might get some 3 time. She apparently offers some position flexibility so maybe I’m wrong on minutes. However, I still think she wouldn’t play 34.7 minutes with several at 38-40.
And, there it is! Damn, I'm good!
Would or would not turn her away? I’m thinking you think she’s a keeper (as do I).A lot of great players don't have great games against us and our defense. Watched a lot of B12 games in the past few years and Fields is pretty good. I definitely would turn her away.
Who IS everybody's cup of tea? Staley, Mulkey, Geno, Tara, etc. aren't exactly all sunshine either. But they win.He is obviously a really good coach, but he is a pretty intense guy and may not be everyone's cup of tea.
Case in point... Ayoka Lee.A lot of great players don't have great games against us and our defense.
I am just searching for explanations. I haven't heard a convincing one yet. The logjam theory is plausible, but Audrey and Ebo are very good and are proven commodities. Frankly, I am not blown away by our incoming freshmen. If they were in the top 5 rated players in the country, I would give that theory a little more credence. (I know, I know -- Vic gets the kind of players who fit his system.) If I understand the logjam theory, the idea is that you let Warren and Ebo know that they are not really welcome back and may not get as much playing time because you want to be sure new players get brought in quickly. That is counter to Vic's professed philosophy of the best player getting the court time, and would make all of his bragging about Warren and Ebo seem a little inauthentic. I am just offering a possibility, that not everyone loves playing for Vic. I don't know that to be true. It is just a possibility. I like Vic a lot in his press conferences, which is all I really know about him, but I also see him getting very angry on the sidelines and brimming over with emotion. In some games, it seemed over the top to me. Again, I have no idea what this transferring is all about. It puzzles me greatly. But it makes it seem like things aren't as rosy and wonderful as at least some of us assumed it to be.Who IS everybody's cup of tea? Staley, Mulkey, Geno, Tara, etc. aren't exactly all sunshine either. But they win.
Are you sure? Vic srikes me as being very random, flighty, and lucky to fall into the good players he gets.I'd say Vic knows what he's specifically looking for and why.
I think you're just worrying for the sake of worrying.It is worrisome to me that the only player who we know to be interested in us is Lauren Fields. I don't remember her that well, but that 3 point percentage is not good. Maybe she is great in other ways.
We only know about Fields because of Moooooo's expert social media detective-work, and the fact that Fields has a proud Father who posted that really cool edit that someone with TexasWBB apparently put together. That tells me it is very likely there are other potential transfers Vic and Co. are communicating with.It is worrisome to me that the only player who we know to be interested in us is Lauren Fields. I don't remember her that well, but that 3 point percentage is not good. Maybe she is great in other ways.
Elena Lovato liked below tweet: