Jacob Johnson
2,500+ Posts
this would honestly be my dream bracket for Texas. I like our style of play against every one of those teams.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just saw that the SEC voted to have its future women's basketball tournaments in Greenville, SC for 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25. So, if we do start competing in the SEC in 2023-24, it will be a pretty long trip.
This coming March, it's being held in Nashville.
Guess this is just something we're gonna have to get used to; the chances of it ever being held in Texas will be very slim this decade. But, I wasn't a fan of the Big 12 insisting it be held in conjunction with the men's tourney in KC every year either; at least in the SEC they are on different weeks/weekends.
While there is no perfect location for all 16 fan bases, having it one city for 3 consecutive years really provides unfair advantages for one or two schools. I don't see a reason why they don't alternate it on an annual basis between Nashville, Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa, Memphis, etc. Having it one city too often won't help build the sport, IMO.
In past seasons, I have seen the SEC tournament in other locations. Strangely, they've held it mainly in some non-metropolitan cities/towns like Duluth, GA; Albany, GA; North Little Rock, AR; Chattanooga, TN; held in Memphis only once.Agree 1000% Moooo. With the additions of Oklahoma and Texas, a centrally located venue for all teams would be Memphis. With it being in Greenville, that's so extreme East Coast for the Gamecocks and Volunteers. Very disappointed at this decision.
I certainly hope SEC will see the benefit of moving the men's and women's tournament to Dallas and OKC to claim Texas and Oklahoma.
Ed O. might have had an ulterior motive or two.I think Ed O was actually the one who gave her the tour.
Just saw that the SEC voted to have its future women's basketball tournaments in Greenville, SC for 2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25. So, if we do start competing in the SEC in 2023-24, it will be a pretty long trip.
This coming March, it's being held in Nashville.
Guess this is just something we're gonna have to get used to; the chances of it ever being held in Texas will be very slim this decade. But, I wasn't a fan of the Big 12 insisting it be held in conjunction with the men's tourney in KC every year either; at least in the SEC they are on different weeks/weekends.
While there is no perfect location for all 16 fan bases, having it one city for 3 consecutive years really provides unfair advantages for one or two schools. I don't see a reason why they don't alternate it on an annual basis between Nashville, Atlanta, Dallas, New Orleans, Tampa, Memphis, etc. Having it one city too often won't help build the sport, IMO.
Definitely not knocking the city. Just believe rotating the location more often is the more fair decision for other programs and their fan bases.Agree that one location doesn't expand exposure, but lived in Greenville, SC, in the '90s - Arena is nice, parking much easier than most places, has lots of good restaurants. It is one of the more cosmopolitan cities in the Deep South because of its international business connections, i.e., BMW, Michelin, Hitachi, Bosch operations are there. Pre-pandemic, there were several AA daily direct flights from DFW to GSP, plus easy connections through Charlotte and Atlanta. When I lived there, cable TV broadcast SEC and ACC women's games every Sunday. Clemson is there (actually, 25 miles away) and Clemson beat Duke and Gail 3 times one season to get to the Sweet 16. South Carolina (The Other USC, as they say) won zero SEC games. More proof that sports are cyclical LOL.
In looking at how the Big 12 and SEC allocate conference championship events, perhaps there is not that much difference; seems like the Big 12 insists on having the women's tournament in KC ever year.
If I had to predict what's gonna happen -- the SEC will award the women's softball conference championship to Oklahoma City since it has the largest facility in the country and host the Women's College World Series. They'll award Texas the swimming & diving championships, or maybe Track & Field (depending on where our T&F facility ranks compared to other schools); and everything else will stay the same.
I was actually talking about outdoor T&F; I should have specified.Wouldn’t be so sure.
OKC hosting softball (and baseball) is definitively possible. But even in the three team Swimming conference, Texas didn’t host this year (though we have before obviously). And we don’t have an indoor track facility.
Tennis would be a good fit here.
I know nothing about marketing, but regarding attendance I think the emphasis should be more on what the Administration should be doing to support the women's program and less about fans not giving the deserved support. For instance, I've heard Chris Beard talk for two weeks about how people should get out to the last game in the historic Erwin Center. Well, the women will actually be playing the last game in the historic Erwin Center, but he doesn't even mention them. Beard can reach more people in his interviews that Vic can, and that's a message UT can control. Vic's media availability speech came across (to me at least) as critical of the fans and really negative. I understand his frustration, but I'm not sure that's the best way to attract more fans to the sport.
Third time is the charm! A sweep of Kansas State and Oklahoma State will ensure Texas keeps that ranking right on into the post season!Texas up to #9 in AP Poll just behind #8 Iowa St and Baylor at #5. OU at #19
After those Big 12 Awards, I think we’ve got a chip on our shoulder. I know I do.Wow, #7! I hope it doesn't mess us up. Throughout the year we've been better with a chip on our shoulder. Every dip into single digits has led to... Perhaps we're ready now. I sure hope so.
You're not alone... I'm pissed!After those Big 12 Awards, I think we’ve got a chip on our shoulder. I know I do.
I wasn't really surprised at us not getting a first teamer. We're a true team and lack a superstar. But when you look at who was named to the first team instead of giving us one person, that's where I get steamed. Particularly ISU getting 3 on there. They didn't even win the conference. We trounced them both times.After those Big 12 Awards, I think we’ve got a chip on our shoulder. I know I do.
I also get that we didn't have anyone who performed like a first-teamer consistently. My biggest issue is how the defensive awards were named. That's ******** that undeniably the best defensive team in the conference (probably top five defensive team in the nation and maybe THE BEST on any given night) only had one person mentioned. And Denarski as DPOY??? GTFOH! Rori should have gotten that hands down.I wasn't really surprised at us not getting a first-teamer. We're a true team and lack a superstar. But when you look at who was named to the first team instead of giving us one person, that's where I get steamed. Particularly ISU getting 3 on there. They didn't even win the conference. We trounced them both times.