2020 Presidential Election: let the jockeying commence

LongestHorn said:
Click to expand...
The intelligence community was telling Trump and Pence things about Flynn that were dubious it seems. Now, Pence has said he doesn't think Flynn was lying to him. Obama didn't like Flynn because Flynn didn't agree with him on things, especially use of the military.

Edit- With the new release today it confirms Comey had nothing on Flynn as of January.
 
Last edited:
Is that the portrait of Obama with the flowers around him? I wouldn’t be present for that unveiling either.
 
98417377_2742696399281591_3964009159258537984_n.jpg
 
Federal judge orders Texas to allow voting by mail. Link. Just another example of the Left going to court to force policy it can't get through legitimate means and one of its political hack judges letting them do it. It'll likely get tossed on appeal, but it is meritless and shouldn't have to go this far.
 
Mr. Deez said:
Federal judge orders Texas to allow voting by mail. Link. Just another example of the Left going to court to force policy it can't get through legitimate means and one of its political hack judges letting them do it. It'll likely get tossed on appeal, but it is meritless and shouldn't have to go this far.
Click to expand...

I didn't know the Declaration of Independence formed a basis in this law.

"“So what’s the rational basis between 65 and 1 day and one day less than 65?” Biery asked."

That one statement indicates to me he wasn't seriously considering he law. That is a chicken-**** comment that smacks of anarchy and could invalidate ANYTHING with a cut-off point.

His "prose" was over the top. This guy is clearly an egomaniac trying WAY too hard to speak in memorable tones.
 
bystander said:
"“So what’s the rational basis between 65 and 1 day and one day less than 65?” Biery asked."
Click to expand...

I understand what he's doing from a legal perspective, but his analysis is garbage. Under that kind of inquiry and rationale, any law that makes a distinction according to age would be unconstitutional. We couldn't have a driving age, a drinking age, a voting age, an age to start collecting Social Security and Medicare, etc. It's moronic on its face.
 
Mr. Deez said:
I understand what he's doing from a legal perspective, but his analysis is garbage. Under that kind of inquiry and rationale, any law that makes a distinction according to age would be unconstitutional. We couldn't have a driving age, a drinking age, a voting age, an age to start collecting Social Security and Medicare, etc. It's moronic on its face.
Click to expand...

And yet he's so arrogant and sure of himself as he delivered that garbage. How do people get away with this?
 
lol -- Weissmann also attended the Hillary Victory Party the night of the election - where he was seen openly weeping

 
Mr D
Is it harder because you are overseas? In Texas people stole mail in ballots from elderly and voted> Several were caught and are no in jail.
Ken Paxton said 66% of his cases are mail in voter fraud
 
Last edited:
I have handled the defense on voter fraud cases twice and both times it involved mail in ballots. It is extremely easy to do. But also kind of easy to get caught.

By the way, on another thread Joe Fan, my favorite poster, says Obama was possibly born in Africa. Should people born on Mars be allowed to mail in their votes?
 
Mr. Deez said:
Federal judge orders Texas to allow voting by mail. Link. Just another example of the Left going to court to force policy it can't get through legitimate means and one of its political hack judges letting them do it. It'll likely get tossed on appeal, but it is meritless and shouldn't have to go this far.
Click to expand...

I have a compromise, if Democrats want voting by mail give it to them but force every voter card to have to go through a certified Federal verification or it can't be counted. The post office does it all the time. You wish to mail in your vote, then you have to go before a federal employee and they have to verify you are a voter and you have to show picture ID and they will stamp your vote and accept it.
 
Mr. Deez said:
Life tenure and almost impossible to remove. Why should he care what the law says?
Click to expand...

I know. It's just incredible that people don't see it. They are so swayed by words. Seduced. It makes them feel good because he sounds smart.

Pig prose with a bow...
 
Austin_Bill said:
I have a compromise, if Democrats want voting by mail give it to them but force every voter card to have to go through a certified Federal verification or it can't be counted. The post office does it all the time. You wish to mail in your vote, then you have to go before a federal employee and they have to verify you are a voter and you have to show picture ID and they will stamp your vote and accept it.
Click to expand...

That would defeat the purpose. Honestly I'm surprised they allow anyone to vote by mail. Is there cheating with mail-in ballots? I don't know, but there's no mechanism in place to consistently detect it if there was. I sign my ballot, but would anyone know if that was a forgery? No. Suppose I pretended someone (who was a real person but who didn't vote) lived at my house. Would anyone know? Pretty hard to know that. And of course, that's from an overseas location. It would be even easier to cheat from the US.
 
In his ruling, Judge Biery said the Texas had cited "little or no evidence" of widespread fraud in states where voting by mail is more widely used.
 
MrD
Paxton said 66% of cases in his office are mail in vote fraud case< There are people in jail from mail in voter fraud from 2018 election
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top