Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They definitely screwed up, but if the air marshal showed up, would you fight him?
So the other 3 passengers who took their voucher and deplaned without incident are just sheeple in your opinion?
Very interesting. What if he would have been trying to get to a loved one who was about to die? As someone who travels often to meetings I cannot miss, the airline should find a way to get volunteers without bloody force. I cannot believe any of you want to support that idiotic behavior. Some of you could be CEO of United based upon your views though.
Keep crying for United.
The guy bought his ticket and took his seat in full accordance with airline policies. His prior behavior or character had nothing to do with this incident. The airline should not have allowed him to board the plane if they were going to remove him. There were other options for getting the united employees to their destination. They should have exhausted those before forcibly removing a passenger.In other words, you are saying we should ignore the pattern of this guy's personal actions which indicate a prevailing attitude that contributes to his unhappy circumstances. We are to ignore the tendency of this guy trying to satisfy his own desires in the easiest way regardless of its effect on others, whether he was illegally trading drugs for sex, or holding up a plane load of people because he would not comply with a legal request. You believe he is justified in acting in a completely shameless, uncivilized manner because he didn't get "his way" despite "his way" being in conflict with the law. Criminals have the same attitude.
There were other options for getting the united employees to their destination. They should have exhausted those before forcibly removing a passenger.
I wasn't aware there was a legal maximum. If so, I think we've found a regulation that can be removed.
SWA has a flight every morning from Chicago to Louisville that arrives at 7:25am. I can't imagine that would have created that much of a delay. Additionally, they could have secured a limo ride to Louisville for the four employees. Greyhound, private plane, Uber and taxis are other options off the top of my head.You guys are leaving out that he left the plane, then ran back down the jetway and re-entered the plane. That alone made him a threat to the safety of the passengers in the opinion of the flight crew. I support that opinion. I don't want to be up in the air trapped in a metal tube with that nut.
This is hindsight talking. What exactly were those other options?
It's there because of the industry. They won't want it removed.
The flight was fine to take off except that one non rev EMPLOYEE could have been not on the plane.When it came down to 3 passengers left and this guy wouldn't, should United have canceled the whole flight? Canceled the flight the next day? Told another customer that they were selected since this guy won't go? Sat at the gate until someone volunteered to leave?
The flight was fine to take off except that one non rev EMPLOYEE could have been not on the plane.
I agree on the limit, but if you made it a cash option people would jump on it at a lower amount.I'm sure there were some union rules that governed that scenario. Shaark can offer more insight but I think the "deadender" employees get paid a lower rate on that flight from Chicago. At least, American Airlines used to for my stepmother who was a flight attendant.
I keep coming back to raising the voucher offer to a point where someone might accept it. Do we know if the other 3 individuals were forced off the plan and given the $800 voucher offer or did they accept it willingly?
The flight was fine to take off except that one non rev EMPLOYEE could have been not on the plane.
I agree on the limit, but if you made it a cash option people would jump on it at a lower amount.
Did not say that. Said leave the employee off and drive them to Louisville. That flight takes off and so does the one the next day.Agree with Husker probably union rules. So you are saying cancel the whole flight the next day?
Also, this quote is interesting. The Chicago Department of Aviation said an officer had been placed on leave and that the dragging “was not in accordance with our standard operating procedure.”
What is the SOP for a person who won't exit a plane?
You guys are leaving out that he left the plane, then ran back down the jetway and re-entered the plane
I am very pro airline. They provide an integral tool for my business. With that said,other companies/industries do as well. It does not absolve them from bad practices.So you are pissed they ruined Continental and you want them to suffer, regardless. I get it.
If Continental was such a great airline, why was United able to take them over? It's one thing to provide great customer service, but it comes at a cost. When your customers will not pay for said service (ie, they go with another carrier who is cheaper) then you go out of business, as Continental did. People are whores for low prices and they will not pay the upcharge for better service, at least not enough of them to keep someone like Continental afloat. This is just how it is and not United's fault.
Was he arrested? If not, I doubt there was an actual security scare or risk. I seriously do not know, but as many have pointed out post 911 is a new world at the airport.^ this part gets completely ignored. Whatever has happened, once you have been removed from a plane, you do not just run back on the plane, especially post 9/11. I am a little bit disturbed he was able to run back onto the plane at all.
then that should have been declared when he checked-in ... distressed passenger.What if he would have been trying to get to a loved one who was about to die?
do you not know the travel status of your pilots that close to the time they need to leave?
Time.Does anyone know why this is in place?
no sir ... it won't guarantee you. What will guarantee you're going is paying a fare commensurate with that avoidance of risk. Like the non-refundables are typically cheaper than a refundable ticket. I can't speak to each circumstance, but understand, a fare which costs more to drive the trip is almost certainly a fare subject to the removal pool.If I check a bag can I ensure I don't get bumped?
That is a 300 mile drive unless they hopped another flight to either Louisville or Cincinnati.
I simply disagree that they can bloody an old man
* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC