Tommy Boy is in Denial

I didn't think he was blaming the players.

As has been noted in threads not related to the Twenty First Century Turtle Tribulations, starting next year I wonder how these pre-conference jewels might wind up:
2019 - LSU
2020 - @LSU
2021 - @piggy
2022 - Bama
2023 - @Bama
2024 - @Meatchicken
2025 - tOSU
2026 - @tOSU
2027 - @Meatchicken

We should stop with the home-and-home stuff and take a cue from LSU and Auburn. Schedule teams from several states away in "neutral" games much nearer to us where we'll have 80% of the crowd, with no return trip to stadiums near the opposition. We could play Penn State in Houston one year, Stanford in New Orleans the next year, Virginia Tech in Dallas the next...
 
I take it you did not major in Finance or Accounting or even marketing. A home game is 90,000+ tickets at $90+ per ticket plus the concessions and parking, not to mention the goodwill created with local merchants created from the thousands coming from out of town to spend money.

Most of the schools playing neutral site do it (1) for the cash needed since they are bleeding on the bottom line, and (2) for greater recruiting and TV visibility, neither of which Texas needs particularly when we receive 30% as much money as a home game generates.

Deloss tried to plan games to places the alums would enjoy visiting. When you aren't winning, the travel crowd wanes significantly - see Fred Smith Stadium last Saturday.
 
How could a mensa coach fall into complacency based off practice?

About this Mensa "Genius" stuff... I don't doubt Tom Herman has a high IQ or whatever. I don't even care about that.

Being a genius and being incompetent are not mutually exclusive.
I work with some people at my job who I am pretty sure are geniuses, they are truly brilliant, but if they are Mensa they don't care or expect anyone else to care about it to make it known.

Knowing Herman is Mensa and watching him struggle to find a way to use $50,000 words and mangle analogies to great American novels in press conferences is kind of a pretentious joke and a bore. Might have impressed people at UH though...

And to Htown's point, maybe Applewhite deserves the Mensa nod:

it is obvious they were running an Applewhite offense at U of H and Applewhite was calling the plays.
 
DKR had a "little assistance" with that decision. Are you suggesting that Herman be provided "assistance"?

Sabrehorn, I believe that you have noted previously that this “asistance” came in the form of an ultimatum from Frank Erwin. I acknowledge that you are well connected and influential in the Longhorn family and that this information was provided to you by someone very high up the chain, possibly even Erwin himself. However, I have strong reservations about this revelation for a number of reasons.

1. Even though Royal was beginning to feel some heat over 3 consecutive 4 loss seasons, he was no doubt very secure in his position. He would have felt no threat from someone even as someone as high up the food chain as Erwin. He had a national coach of the year award in his back pocket and was one of the most respected coaches in the country. He had already been offered the head coaching job at his alma mater, and Oklahoma was known to covet his return.

2. Royal was confident and had an ego. He was known to bristle when challenged by “non-football “ people and was known not to relent to this sort of pressure. As far as Erwin, when Texas began to take their lumps in the early 70’s against Oklahoma and their questionable recruiting tactics, Erwin implored Royal to fight fire with fire. Royal summarily told him to stick it.

3. Texas was not close to having a QB controversy when Royal made the switch against Texas Tech. Texas had only one game under their belt with the new wishbone offense, a 20-20 tie against Houston. Houston was a solid team in those days, and 20 points was a credible offensive performance in that era. Street was a virtual unknown. Only when the wheels completely came off against Tech did Royal make the change. There is no way Erwin was on the sidelines of games whispering coaching advice in Royal’s ear during a ballgame.

4. Royal was not averse to making quarterback changes during games, and did this with some frequency. Inserting Johnny Genung in the great 4th quarter comeback against Arkansas in ’62 and Tommy Wade for Duke Carlisle against A&M in ‘63 are a couple of examples.

5. Much more likely, Street had been running the new offense more effectively than Bradley during fall drills, but the coaches wanted to give Bradley time to take to it. The collapse in Lubbock on offense and defense forced their hand to make a move. Down by 3 scores, Street mounted a mighty comeback but fell short. The following week Royal moved Bradley to split end and Street QB’d a 31-3 whipping of Oklahoma State. The wishbone was off and running.

6. If anyone gave Royal a nudge, it was most likely offensive coordinator Emory Bellard, who said something like, “Coach, you know Street has been looking really good in practice…”
 
I take it you did not major in Finance or Accounting or even marketing. A home game is 90,000+ tickets at $90+ per ticket plus the concessions and parking, not to mention the goodwill created with local merchants created from the thousands coming from out of town to spend money.

Most of the schools playing neutral site do it (1) for the cash needed since they are bleeding on the bottom line, and (2) for greater recruiting and TV visibility, neither of which Texas needs particularly when we receive 30% as much money as a home game generates.

Deloss tried to plan games to places the alums would enjoy visiting. When you aren't winning, the travel crowd wanes significantly - see Fred Smith Stadium last Saturday.

Oh I actually think home and homes are usually better, especially since every single year we play a truer neutral site game than most.

It was more a shot at these teams that are using 1-time neutral site games to effectively get more home field advantage without having to play any tough away games.
 
Sabrehorn, I believe that you have noted previously that this “asistance” came in the form of an ultimatum from Frank Erwin. I acknowledge that you are well connected and influential in the Longhorn family and that this information was provided to you by someone very high up the chain, possibly even Erwin himself. However, I have strong reservations about this revelation for a number of reasons.

1. Even though Royal was beginning to feel some heat over 3 consecutive 4 loss seasons, he was no doubt very secure in his position. He would have felt no threat from someone even as someone as high up the food chain as Erwin. He had a national coach of the year award in his back pocket and was one of the most respected coaches in the country. He had already been offered the head coaching job at his alma mater, and Oklahoma was known to covet his return.

2. Royal was confident and had an ego. He was known to bristle when challenged by “non-football “ people and was known not to relent to this sort of pressure. As far as Erwin, when Texas began to take their lumps in the early 70’s against Oklahoma and their questionable recruiting tactics, Erwin implored Royal to fight fire with fire. Royal summarily told him to stick it.

3. Texas was not close to having a QB controversy when Royal made the switch against Texas Tech. Texas had only one game under their belt with the new wishbone offense, a 20-20 tie against Houston. Houston was a solid team in those days, and 20 points was a credible offensive performance in that era. Street was a virtual unknown. Only when the wheels completely came off against Tech did Royal make the change. There is no way Erwin was on the sidelines of games whispering coaching advice in Royal’s ear during a ballgame.

4. Royal was not averse to making quarterback changes during games, and did this with some frequency. Inserting Johnny Genung in the great 4th quarter comeback against Arkansas in ’62 and Tommy Wade for Duke Carlisle against A&M in ‘63 are a couple of examples.

5. Much more likely, Street had been running the new offense more effectively than Bradley during fall drills, but the coaches wanted to give Bradley time to take to it. The collapse in Lubbock on offense and defense forced their hand to make a move. Down by 3 scores, Street mounted a mighty comeback but fell short. The following week Royal moved Bradley to split end and Street QB’d a 31-3 whipping of Oklahoma State. The wishbone was off and running.

6. If anyone gave Royal a nudge, it was most likely offensive coordinator Emory Bellard, who said something like, “Coach, you know Street has been looking really good in practice…”
BadShort, great history lesson. You have probably forgotten more than I can remember.
 
Back
Top