2020 is Nixon 1972 all over again. Press hates him, but effective president.We can't have a Republican, let alone THIS Republican, bring about peace.
By the way, Nixon is talked about way more than Kennedy, Johnson, Ike, Ford, Carter, etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2020 is Nixon 1972 all over again. Press hates him, but effective president.We can't have a Republican, let alone THIS Republican, bring about peace.
And if the Dems nominate on of the far-left wingnuts to run for POTUS, Trump will win in a manner similar to Nixon in 1972.2020 is Nixon 1972 all over again. Press hates him, but effective president.
Please Garmel, share more Qanon stories about the coming storm.![]()
Peace and prosperity is hard to beat.LOL! Please tell me about how close we are to getting rid of Trump. I need my fake news, man!
Longest is on a roll recently. It's quite amusing.
Who is the Libertarian's unprincipled troll? I might like following him/her/it.
Busing was one of the dumbest actions ever forced on society, and a very long list of liberal policies exist. Creepy, tired Uncle Joe got one right.This Jason Campbell hack is falsifying the quote. The quote is correct, but he didn't say "just." He said, "In many cases . . ." His point was that you could oppose forced busing for non-bigoted reasons, and of course, he is right.
Busing was one of the dumbest actions ever forced on society, and a very long list of liberal policies exist. Creepy, tired Uncle Joe got one right.
Jason Campbell is good as smearing people.
This is what passes for news in the MSM. Mitch McConnell, who opposes reparations, is descended from two slave owners
I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, and some on the Right believe in some nutty ones. However, one of the Democratic presidential candidates thinks that transwomen need abortion services (which means he thinks they can get pregnant). For saying so, he got cheered and wasn't challenged at all. In other words, significant numbers of Democrats agreed with him - enough to make calling out this idiocy political damaging. Next to that, a conspiracy theory about JFK, Jr. faking his death and being a Trump supporter is quite sane.
Campbell is good at ignoring things that make Shapiro sound reasonable and taking things out of context to paint in the most negative light possible.
I was a volunteer on Ross Perot for POTUS on both his campaigns. He said and did plenty of dumb things. But by today’s standards, he’s a Roosevelt.I didn't enable anyone, in the first election. I voted for Ross Perot in '92 as a registered Republican. In hindsight I should have been more judicious with my '96 vote. What's your excuse?
Maybe you could give an example of Shapiro doing the same thing to others to back up your point.In other words, Campbell did to Shapiro what Shapiro does to others?
I can't stand these social media shock jock equivalents conservative or progressive). They make money on being provocative, not genuinely educating their followers. That gets you an invite to the White House though.
That may have been the most brilliant response to a liberal reporter that I have ever seen. Pointing out that their Messiah Obama held a similar position is impossible for the MSM to counter-punch.Annnnd then CM owns the moment, drops the mic and walks away.
So the problem is the faulty articulation of a politician that has nothing else to offer other than his ability to articulate.To be fair, Transgender discussions are a challenge due to the syntax of language, specifically the English language. Do you think Julian Castro intended to say "biological men" should be able to have abortions or the more plausible scenario a biological woman acting and claiming to be a male? He was clearly pandering to the far left.
To be fair, Transgender discussions are a challenge due to the syntax of language, specifically the English language. Do you think Julian Castro intended to say "biological men" should be able to have abortions or the more plausible scenario a biological woman acting and claiming to be a male? He was clearly pandering to the far left.