The Media Industry

horninchicago said:
I'm always amazed at these clips where the same person's contrasting words are placed side by side. How is it that these dolts don't research to not contradict themselves. It's because Trump is and has been correct about the likes of this person. Fake News and enemy of the people when blatantly dishonest and deceiving.
Click to expand...

More, from the same NYT writer -- you can do this was just about anything she has ever written. The top tweet is from today, the ones below are from 2012 to 2015

EQB_Sd2VUAALjAI


EQB_TF8XkAAPtYM

EQB_Tb9UYAAs6Dk

EQB_T_fXUAcJXNI
 
As you might have guessed the NYT had differing ways to tell the story of the Clinton and Trump vote outcomes
Clinton won 55-45 on one charge, while the other was split 50-50.
Trump won his two votes 52-48 and 53-47.
The numbers were identical -- both had 105 not guilty, 95 votes for guilty
The NYT headline was "Clinton acquitted decisively: No majority for either charge"
The NYT headline for Trump read - "Split Senate"

EQEVgeeWAAALGNl


EQEVgefWsAAzUV1
 
Last edited:
mchammer said:
More than interesting- she’s a winner. I presume that attitude carries over into the bedroom.
Click to expand...

Ultimately, the women are jealous because she's hotter than they are, and the dude is jealous, because he's probably married to some woke, whiny feminist who doesn't do anything for him.
 
Mr. Deez said:
Ultimately, the women are jealous because she's hotter than they are, and the dude is jealous, because he's probably married to some woke, whiny feminist who doesn't do anything for him.
Click to expand...

They would have been perfectly happy if she was a single woman who got knocked up, doesn't know who the father is, and living off of the taxpayers. They would be discussing how brave and strong she is. How did Western civilization get this screwed up?
 
Mr. Deez said:
Ultimately, the women are jealous because she's hotter than they are, and the dude is jealous, because he's probably married to some woke, whiny feminist who doesn't do anything for him.
Click to expand...

The group reaction from the TV people seems like auto-reflex. It always reminds me of the Stepford Wives. They are following the protocols established by their programming.
 
That Australian wife and mother is a hero. I bet her family dotes on her, at least her husband, because of her hard work and dedication.

The response by the talking heads just shows that they don't value marriage or motherhood, which means to me they don't value women. They value men and masculinity. That is why they want women to live traditional male lives.
 
Monahorns said:
That Australian wife and mother is a hero. I bet her family dotes on her, at least her husband, because of her hard work and dedication.

The response by the talking heads just shows that they don't value marriage or motherhood, which means to me they don't value women. They value men and masculinity. That is why they want women to live traditional male lives.
Click to expand...

With great kids
 
MSNBC gave this woman her own show on politics. But she is so dumb, it is painful to watch. Here she suggests "gerrymandering" is the issue with regard to federal judicial appointments. She has been doing this sort of thing for awhile but NBC leaves her on the air -- I guess they know their own audience

"Is gerrymandering something that would help improve the situation? How does that sort of divide promote consensus in the Senate, or even in the House?​

 
Joe Fan said:
MSNBC gave this woman her own show on politics. But she is so dumb, it is painful to watch. Here she suggests "gerrymandering" is the issue with regard to federal judicial appointments. She has been doing this sort of thing for awhile but NBC leaves her on the air -- I guess they know their own audience

"Is gerrymandering something that would help improve the situation? How does that sort of divide promote consensus in the Senate, or even in the House?​

Click to expand...


That's AOC level of stupidity right there.
 
Joe Fan said:
MSNBC gave this woman her own show on politics. But she is so dumb, it is painful to watch. Here she suggests "gerrymandering" is the issue with regard to federal judicial appointments. She has been doing this sort of thing for awhile but NBC leaves her on the air -- I guess they know their own audience

"Is gerrymandering something that would help improve the situation? How does that sort of divide promote consensus in the Senate, or even in the House?​

Click to expand...
Loved the realization that Democrats have to start appealing to voters in more States in order to win the Senate. What a revelation. LMAO!
 
Mr. Deez said:
It kills them to admit this. They really hate voters in those states.
Click to expand...

They think changing the Constitution is easier and even preferable to changing anything about their positions and politics to make them more appealable to normal Americans across the electoral spectrum.

Speaking of normal, here is normal in San Francisco now
 
Last edited:
Need a viable alternative to Youtube. I've heard Bitchute is a possible alternative, but needs to get to critical mass.
 
Honestly, I haven't. But I will when they kick several of my favorite Conservative Youtubers and those Youtubers move over to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top