Protecting our 2nd Amendment Rights

I know the Dixie Chicks were slapped around pretty hard. Patriotism is very emotional for many people and they were in Europe (home of white privilege, marauding imperialists, killers of indigenous tribes, Hitler etc) and decided they wanted to bond with that legacy. So that was it as far as tried and true country fans are concerned. The lead singer called Toby Keith ignorant and I laughed about it. The thing is, I can't stand that all shucks red neck Blake Shelton phony baloney, but they asked for trouble by cozing up to Europe when a war was on. It was like Jane Fonda. Funny thing is how Michelle loves George Bush now.

Twitter is engaging in raw censorship.

Debra Messing is a loud mouth Hollywood phony white privileged person. Not sure about Karl Rove or what that is...

French Fries came about because France refused to support the US in the Iraq war. It was a big deal at the time.

The real cancel culture we're talking about is the idea that if you don't support BLM or Metoo and all the other sub-groups unconditionally then you will be attacked. It's the social level activism on the ground that makes so many people afraid to speak their opinion. It is fully operational.

Why do you think Trump won? No, it's not because we are a nation of white supremacist Nazi's. It's because so many are sick of the attacks from the Left. PCness is a Leftist construct 100% and it is a political tool to stamp out dissent.
I'm not litigating that these people may have been reasonably "cancelled" from your perspective. I'm just pointing out that both sides play this game. The cancel culture all over the right wing sites are things like Dr. Suess foundation not printing six of their own books.

Trump won because he fanned some of the worst flames that lie at our human core. That and a perfect storm that included a horrible opponent, foreign assistance and luck.
 
Young Pharaoh

Ok, I had to look this guy up. I don't know why he's famous or anything. But in the article I found, there was this description of QAnon:

"QAnon believers think that a shadowy international child trafficking ring of Satan-worshipping Democrats, Hollywood elites and lizard-humanoids sexually abuse and torture children in order to extract an allegedly psychedelic, youth-rejuvenating chemical called adrenochrome from their victim's pituitary glands."

And this...

"Frazzledrip, a QAnon-related conspiracy theory, claims that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sexually assaulted a child, cut off the child's face and wore it as a mask before drinking the child's blood."

What we are dealing with concerning this cancel culture is the boundaries of obsession. In my view, and I'd tell anyone who asked, the QAnon and Frazzledrip people are extremists who are mentally ill. What is it that you want? CPAC did the right thing.

But that's not what we are talking about. We are talking about the Liberal army on Twitter and in the colleges who are destroying any hint of non-compliance with purist inclusion and diversity dogma.
 
1. MOST liberals want common sense and bipartisan agreed things like universal background checks. Nothing liberals "want" and can get done is not much stricter.
2. I think if we could just reverse the Trump tax cuts that were not across the board we'd be happy. Most don't think reparations is a good idea and I know of no one who thinks giving illegals benefits is a good idea.
3. Dixie Chicks, NFL, Nike, HBO, Glenfiddich, Twitter, Debra Messing, ATT, Harley Davidson, Apple, Karl Rove, Meghan Kelly, french fries, etc.
This is also funny: Altercation: When the Right Cancels It, It Ain’t Cancel Culture “Update: CPAC [the Conservative Political Action Conference] has cancelled Young Pharaoh’s scheduled appearance following the publication of this article. Young Pharaoh’s information has also been removed from CPAC’s website. The theme of this year’s gathering is ‘America Uncancelled.’”

It's like a really slow tennis match.
Bubba, explain why the Trump tax cuts need to be reversed.
 
Ok, I had to look this guy up. I don't know why he's famous or anything. But in the article I found, there was this description of QAnon:

"QAnon believers think that a shadowy international child trafficking ring of Satan-worshipping Democrats, Hollywood elites and lizard-humanoids sexually abuse and torture children in order to extract an allegedly psychedelic, youth-rejuvenating chemical called adrenochrome from their victim's pituitary glands."

And this...

"Frazzledrip, a QAnon-related conspiracy theory, claims that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sexually assaulted a child, cut off the child's face and wore it as a mask before drinking the child's blood."

What we are dealing with concerning this cancel culture is the boundaries of obsession. In my view, and I'd tell anyone who asked, the QAnon and Frazzledrip people are extremists who are mentally ill. What is it that you want? CPAC did the right thing.

But that's not what we are talking about. We are talking about the Liberal army on Twitter and in the colleges who are destroying any hint of non-compliance with purist inclusion and diversity dogma.
Frazzledrip. Allsome! Dude, I'm just saying both sides want to cancel the other side's things. That's all. Also, you have at least one Q poster here.
 
It does look to be just one. Btw, how many Blue Anon do we have here? ;)
31C375D2-D521-492E-AE6C-C56A348F3849.jpeg
 
I am assured the controls will be reasonable and not infringe on my rights. Going to a gun show this Sunday to get more ammo just in case I am incorrect.
If I was paranoid I might think Biden was an agent of the gun cartel trying to drive up prices.
Nah.
 
I am assured the controls will be reasonable and not infringe on my rights. Going to a gun show this Sunday to get more ammo just in case I am incorrect.
If I was paranoid I might think Biden was an agent of the gun cartel trying to drive up prices.
Nah.
10% for the Big Guy...
 
Trump won because he fanned some of the worst flames that lie at our human core.
Wow. The worst huh? Man, Hillary was sure unpopular if it took only the worst of us to get her defeated. You probably meant to say our deplorable human core I’m sure.
 
I'm not litigating that these people may have been reasonably "cancelled" from your perspective. I'm just pointing out that both sides play this game. The cancel culture all over the right wing sites are things like Dr. Suess foundation not printing six of their own books.

Trump won because he fanned some of the worst flames that lie at our human core. That and a perfect storm that included a horrible opponent, foreign assistance and luck.
I’m not 100% sure, but I’m guessing Russian collusion played a major role in Trump winning. Maybe someone should look into that.

Speaking of foreign interference, is Stumbling Mumbling Joe Dementia still supporting the Chi-com’s “custom” of slavery for their least favorite citizens?
 
A guy with dementia is in control of the most powerful country in the world and he is managing through executive order. I’m going to send him an email of how I won the lottery in Africa. I just need his social security number so I can cash the check. I’ll smartly offer 10% for the big guy.
 
Wow. The worst huh? Man, Hillary was sure unpopular if it took only the worst of us to get her defeated. You probably meant to say our deplorable human core I’m sure.
I mean he worked to trigger the worst part of us. We each have that in us. I really think newt started us down this path.

Hillary would have been a great asset during the pandemic. She was a horrible candidate.
 
Hillary would have made a lot of money for Bill during the pandemic. She was a horrible candidate though.
 
You're mixing up the DoI and the Constitution with your last paragraph, and the left isn't even CLOSE to taking away that right.

When that couple in St Louis felt threatened by rioters and they brought out their guns and told them to leave their property, it was the government that went after them. No one was hurt, no one killed, but in the eyes of the government they considered the couple criminals for trying to protect themselves. Don't tell me this isn't a constitutional right. I know the words come from the DOI but the principal rights talked about in the DOI were guaranteed by the Constitution.
 
1. MOST liberals want common sense and bipartisan agreed things like universal background checks. Nothing liberals "want" and can get done is not much stricter.

Lol, I love it when I hear your pretty little words like "common sense". It makes you sound reasonable. I'm sure putting a frog in water that is 70 degrees is common sense to a frog until the temp is turned up higher and higher until the frog is cooked.

You see the libs don't want "common sense" gun laws they want to ban guns and this is how they walk us there. Using pretty words like "common sense". Their laws don't work, and they know it, so they turn up the heat little by little with more "common sense" until they have taken away our rights and all that is left are the criminals to do freely as they want. (See Nazi Germany).




Trump won because he fanned some of the worst flames that lie at our human core. That and a perfect storm that included a horrible opponent, foreign assistance and luck.

Trump won because no one could stomach Hilary and her crap. I'd have voted for anyone over her.


Speaking of foreign interference, is Stumbling Mumbling Joe Dementia still supporting the Chi-com’s “custom” of slavery for their least favorite citizens?

I hear I can get a new kidney in China, they seem to have them laying around, just have to pick one out.
 
Our government above all else has to fear the American people we have them more than out gunned.

Do that many Americans have weapons such as tanks, armored vehicles, M119A3 105mm or 155mm towed howitzers, or Paladin 155mm self-propelled howitzers? How about aircraft like F-15 Eagles, F-15E Strike Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-22 Raptor, or A-10's? How's for assault helecraft? A bunch of knuckleheads with automatic or semi-automatic weapons and a small collection of explosives lining up to take on the US military would not last very long. Besides, the military would dump chemicals on that group and game over. Great theory for the government to be afraid of the people, but in reality it's no contest.
 
Do that many Americans have weapons such as tanks, armored vehicles, M119A3 105mm or 155mm towed howitzers, or Paladin 155mm self-propelled howitzers? How about aircraft like F-15 Eagles, F-15E Strike Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-22 Raptor, or A-10's? How's for assault helecraft? A bunch of knuckleheads with automatic or semi-automatic weapons and a small collection of explosives lining up to take on the US military would not last very long. Besides, the military would dump chemicals on that group and game over. Great theory for the government to be afraid of the people, but in reality it's no contest.
What is the total number of troops in the U.S. military? Compare that to the total number of armed U.S. citizens. Now imagine if the U.S. military was ever forced to occupy the United States. The resistance put forth by armed American civilians would make Viet Nam and Afghanistan look like a garden party.
 
Besides, the military would dump chemicals on that group and game over. Great theory for the government to be afraid of the people, but in reality it's no contest.

With evil like that, they need to be overthrown sooner than later.
 
Do that many Americans have weapons such as tanks, armored vehicles, M119A3 105mm or 155mm towed howitzers, or Paladin 155mm self-propelled howitzers? How about aircraft like F-15 Eagles, F-15E Strike Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-22 Raptor, or A-10's? How's for assault helecraft? A bunch of knuckleheads with automatic or semi-automatic weapons and a small collection of explosives lining up to take on the US military would not last very long. Besides, the military would dump chemicals on that group and game over. Great theory for the government to be afraid of the people, but in reality it's no contest.
Like I posted before, unless the military is on your side, trying to take over the US government would be absolutely futile.
 
Like I posted before, unless the military is on your side, trying to take over the US government would be absolutely futile.
It would be much easier to use a printing press and mail in voting. You may have to build a fence around the Capitol and call in a ridiculous amount of national guardsmen to protect your cheating asses from the vicious skinny jeans/starbucks crowd, but lives would be saved.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict TEXAS-KENTUCKY *
Sat, Nov 23 • 2:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top