Post Left Wing looniness here

017A59EE-FF4A-44CB-A6ED-583B0F5638CA.jpeg
 
Will his handlers stop him from running for reelection?
He has come close to announcing he will run.
If he does announce it things will get awkward.
They might have to change his meds
 
Horn6721 said:
Will his handlers stop him from running for reelection?
He has come close to announcing he will run.
If he does announce it things will get awkward.
They might have to change his meds
Click to expand...

He's going to express his intent to run to keep from becoming a lame duck, but I don't think he actually will. I don't think he actually wanted to run in '20.
 
Horn6721 said:
Mr D
Did they want Biden specifically? Or did they just want Trump gone?
Was it because he was the most malleable?
Click to expand...

They wanted someone who could play the part well enough to win back Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, meaning the nominee needed at least some blue collar appeal. He was the only one who had some or could at least fake it. Bernie? Too weird and too radical. Warren? Too pretentious, too radical, and too bitchy. Bloomberg? Too aloof, too rich, and not liberal enough. Buttigieg? Too pretentious, too young, too arrogant, and too gay.
 
Mr. Deez said:
They wanted someone who could play the part well enough to win back Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, meaning the nominee needed at least some blue collar appeal. He was the only one who had some or could at least fake it. Bernie? Too weird and too radical. Warren? Too pretentious, too radical, and too bitchy. Bloomberg? Too aloof, too rich, and not liberal enough. Buttigieg? Too pretentious, too young, too arrogant, and too gay.
Click to expand...

Mr. Deez said:
Almost forgot Kamala Harris. Too awkward, too aloof, and too dumb.
Click to expand...

Now do OUBubba!
 
Mr. Deez said:
He went to OU, lives in Oklahoma, and likes Barry Switzer. That pretty much says it all.
Click to expand...
In college, friends of mine caught a suite mate of theirs in the dorm room humping a rolled up carpet. Thus, he became immortalized as the rug-humper. I think he was from eastern NC. It’s what I imagine Okies and Aggies to be.
 
mchammer said:
In college, friends of mine caught a suite mate of theirs in the dorm room humping a rolled up carpet. Thus, he became immortalized as the rug-humper. I think he was from eastern NC. It’s what I imagine Okies and Aggies to be.
Click to expand...

When I hear stories like this, it makes me wonder what gets into guys. As guys, we've all gotten a little "backed up," but even when my hormones were raging at their very hardest, I never would have humped an inanimate object or even considered it.
 
Last edited:
Run Pincher said:
The hypocrisy from scum like the pelosi's just pisses me pisses me off more and more. Will the MSM ever publish an article like this. The fascists just get richer and richer, gain more power every day. Just a matter of time.

Nancy and Paul Pelosi are trading large — with a wealth of hypocrisy (nypost.com)
Click to expand...
I think we should all support anyone elected to a national office having any of their resources put into a blind trust. Kelly Loefler made a killing and many on the right did when Covid hit. This crap drives me crazy.

That said, what they did was legal under our current laws as has been well established and as much as I think it's ****. What's good for the goose...
 
Monahorns said:
Part of Conservatism is traditional Christian morality. Anyone can be for limited government and monetary/financial constraint, but that is only a part of what makes up Conservatism. Traditionally those issues are more liberal than conservative anyway. We need to be clear about the words we use. Changing the definition of words is a Leftist ploy to pull society their direction. A conservative will want to preserve definitions of words a political labels.

Conservatism has been losing the social/cultural war for a long time now, except now maybe abortion, but that doesn't mean Conservatism changed.

Now maybe the Republican Party becomes a liberal party socially, but that just means it isn't as conservative as it once was.

I would think someone who is LGBT and for limited government and a high level of individual rights is more libertarian not conservative.
Click to expand...
For starters, the T has fuckall to do with gay and lesbian causes. They coat-tailed and now the rest of the alphabet did the same thing...they have made it all but impossible to state that female is a biological reality that one cannot identify out of.

Being gay or lesbian has nothing to do with politics. One can still very much be fiscally conservative and, indeed, even conservative on most social issues, to include abortion, crime and gun rights while STILL being gay or lesbian.

My being lesbian does not impact you in any single element of your life. Any decision I might want to make to marry a partner does not impact you in any manner. MOST gay and lesbians who want nothing to do with alphabet soup nonsense fly under the radar of most people. We simply strive to get through each day without getting screwed by Bidenomics the same as you do. We complain about prices at the pump the same as you do. We complain about our now-201K accounts the same as you do. Most of us avoid PDA just as, presumably, the same as you do.

You would do well not to turn Republican voters against your cause...doing so is not going to cause gay and lesbians to vote libtile but CAN have the impact of causing some to simply not vote. You kill the turnout and you kill the Nation...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Prediction Results Threads

2024 Schedules

Back
Top