Post Left Wing looniness here

[Horn6721]

Honestly I am just gob smacked that so many people are pretending transgenderism is normal.

 

[mchammer]

Honestly I am just gob smacked that so many people are pretending transgenderism is normal.

They are not pretending per se. Instead they are deathly afraid of being called a racist or terrorist for opposing trans.

 

[Horn6721]

mc
I am sure you are right about some. But to have people support mutilating children?

 

[mchammer]

mc
I am sure you are right about some. But to have people support mutilating children?

These are the same people who turn a blind eye to the rape occurring at the border.

 

[nashhorn]

“Blind eye” “pretending”, in a sense same way of saying same sentiment. Country is beyond help, “let’s go Brandon”.

 

[Horn6721]

So we now learn that the USNavy utilized "Digital Ambassadors" who were drag queens currently in the Navy to perform to reach a new segment to enlist.
The reasoning is being inclusive allows more to serve "authentically".
Authentically??

The Navy 'looked at what happened with Bud Light and said 'hold my beer'," Jesse Watters said

and now this
Space Force commander fired for criticizing CRT rips Navy's turn to drag queens for recruitment

 

[Mr. Deez]

So we now learn that the USNavy utilized "Digital Ambassadors" who were drag queens currently in the Navy to perform to reach a new segment to enlist.
The reasoning is being inclusive allows more to serve "authentically".
Authentically??

The Navy 'looked at what happened with Bud Light and said 'hold my beer'," Jesse Watters said

and now this
Space Force commander fired for criticizing CRT rips Navy's turn to drag queens for recruitment

I saw this, and I don't get it. Trying to get woke ******* to join the military isn't a smart strategy. Few will join, and it's hard to imagine them making good soldiers and sailors.

The military is and should be a place for guys with balls - southerners (white, black, and Hispanic) and people from rural areas. Those guys will be turned off by this sort of thing.

 

[mchammer]

 

[Horn6721]

WTF isn't strong enough
What happened to our country?

 

[mchammer]

Another person reading Horns Fans. I said genderism is another form of multiple personality disorder of the 1970’s.

 

[EDT]

New Bud lite Ad

 

[Mr. Deez]

New Bud lite Ad

Don't forget. SNL was actually ahead of its time in the '90s. Adam Sandler and Chris Farley at the top of their game.

 

[mchammer]

"AAAAAAAAAHHHH": Trans Activist Unleashes Primal Scream At SF Board Meeting | ZeroHedge

 

[Horn6721]

Why didn't they turn ITs mic off?

 

[Mr. Deez]

 

[horninchicago]

What am I missing? It does look like they won and didn't get run over like they should have.

 

[EDT]

 

[mchammer]

 

[mchammer]

 

[utahorn]

In keeping with the current times, I now identify as a Black Californian. Give me my money!

 

[mchammer]

 

[Horn6721]

This is NOT the Bee
"
A judge ruled that a transgender woman could not have indecently exposed her penis in a YMCA female changing room after agreeing with her claim that she’s too fat for it to be visible.

Darren Glines, who now goes by Rachel, was found not guilty of three counts of indecent exposure at the facility in Xenia, Ohio.

Judge David McNamee cleared Glines after agreeing that the size of her belly meant it would be impossible for anyone to see her penis.

Glines, 31, has had several complaints made against her dating back to 2021 – with at least three people complaining that they saw a ‘naked male in the female locker room.’

One of the complaints stated that there were three juveniles present during the incident, with a woman going to the front desk to report the issue.

 

[Mr. Deez]

This is NOT the Bee
"
A judge ruled that a transgender woman could not have indecently exposed her penis in a YMCA female changing room after agreeing with her claim that she’s too fat for it to be visible.

Darren Glines, who now goes by Rachel, was found not guilty of three counts of indecent exposure at the facility in Xenia, Ohio.

Judge David McNamee cleared Glines after agreeing that the size of her belly meant it would be impossible for anyone to see her penis.

Glines, 31, has had several complaints made against her dating back to 2021 – with at least three people complaining that they saw a ‘naked male in the female locker room.’

One of the complaints stated that there were three juveniles present during the incident, with a woman going to the front desk to report the issue.

Obviously Garmel is the real authority on stuff like this, but doesn't the judge have a point here? If you can't see it, is it being exposed?

 

[guy4321]

Obviously Garmel is the real authority on stuff like this, but doesn't the judge have a point here? If you can't see it, is it being exposed?

Did the judge see the defendant nude to determine if the penis was hidden?

 

[Mr. Deez]

Did the judge see the defendant nude to determine if the penis was hidden?

There's no mention of the judge vomiting from the bench, so I assume he relied on the testimony of witnesses.

 

[Sangre Naranjada]

Obviously Garmel is the real authority on stuff like this, but doesn't the judge have a point here? If you can't see it, is it being exposed?

The real problem is, those women can't UNSEE whatever it was they saw, even if it was just a hairy dunlap belly.

 

[Horn6721]

In addition to adult female there were 3 17 y o girls

 

[Mr. Deez]

The real problem is, those women can't UNSEE whatever it was they saw, even if it was just a hairy dunlap belly.

I completely understand, but let's suppose I'm the trial judge and dealing with the Texas indecent exposure statute. It says, "a person commits an offense if he exposes his anus or any part of his genitals with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, and he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by his act."

It refers specifically to the exposure of theanus or genitals, not his hairy fat stomach. It would gross me out and I wouldn't feel good about it, but I'd have to follow the law as it's written and let the guy walk.

 

[Horn6721]

MrD
Is there any law against a man exposing himself to 17 y o girls?
Even if his fat covered his tiny dong

 

[Mr. Deez]

MrD
Is there any law against a man exposing himself to 17 y o girls?
Even if his fat covered his tiny dong

No. For starters, the Texas indecency with a child statute requires the child to be under 17. In addition, even if the girl was under 17, the act still limits itself to showing your *** or your junk. The big difference if it's a minor child is that it becomes a second degree felony rather than a Class B misdemeanor.