North Carolina Bans Civil Unions

Not true at all, bayer.

My real point is that no one can know what god thinks. To claim so is a fraud engaged in by the ignorant or the totalitarian.

We must be very, very careful of those who claim to "know" what God thinks. Whether they be Xtian or Muslim.

That is the point. I'm not surprised you missed it.

Maybe you'll be able to understand it in your next life.
 
Crockett- I dont care about homosexuals or what they do unless there is a possibility that public policy will change in that regard without the will of the people.
The line is what society says it is, not what a group of sexual deviants want it to be.
Does the argument that they were born that way apply to other sexual deviants such as those engaging in pedophilia, necrophelia, beastiality or incest??? I see no difference or care about their urges or how they came about them.
Somehow, a small contingent has decided that homosexuals should not be part of the sexual deviant group and has pushed that agenda. Society has rejected that thought process.
I find it amusing that people find one sexual deviance is better than another.
 
Ivan -- I find sexual exploitation of the innocent and nonconsenting as bad. Sex between consenting adults in a private setting, not so bad.

I don't think popularity should be the guidelines for assigning civil liberties, but hey maybe the Nazis had it right.
 
Crockett- We are very much in agreement on what consenting adults can do, we need to stay out of the bedroom. A brother and sister or mother and son can be consenting adults, but not sure you should be considered a Nazi if you said it should be illegal for them to marry. Same as homosexuals. Society rejects incest marraige and also rejects homosexual marraige.
Just the way it is. Not sure how that makes the American public Nazis.
 
Well, in North Carolina, they also outlawed civil unions. That seems to step over the line from what can argued is a reasoned upholding of social mores into the realm of making things miserable for people whose sexual prefernce you disapprove.
 
While some my argue that the work of the late Yale historian, John Boswell is skewed, much of his stuff has withstood the scrutiny of fellow academics. Professor Bowell provides some evidence that same gender marriages were a sacred rite in the early Christian Church.
The Link
 
How did this dissolve into an argument over the semantics of the Old Testament?

I can guarantee that 99% of the people that voted one way or another in the NC referendum didn't have much grasp on the legality, morality and transformation of the law in the Christian Bible.
 
Agreed. I am somewhat surprised that so many people are okay with the crazy notion of voting to grant or deny the civil rights of any human being.
 
NC decided to make the love pirates step up to the plate and get married or lose benefits. Probably why the margin of victory wasn't larger.
 
sat?
this surprised me
' I am somewhat surprised that so many people are okay with the crazy notion of voting to grant or deny the civil rights of any human being. "

so you think voting the civil rights act of 1964, voting to allow blacks and women to be able to vote is crazy?
 

NEW: Pro Sports Forums

Cowboys, Texans, Rangers, Astros, Mavs, Rockets, etc. Pro Longhorns. The Chiefs and that Swift gal. This is the place.

Pro Sports Forums

Recent Threads

Back
Top