Joe Biden Accomplishment Thread

Donald%2BTrump%252BLeaning%2BForward%252BWhy%2Bis%2Bthe%2BPresident%2BStanding%2Blike%2Bthat%253F%252BBody%2BLanguage%252BBody%2BLanguage%2BExpert%252BEmotional%2BIntelligence%252BNonverbal%252BSpeaker%252BKeynote%252BConsultant%252BLos%2BAngeles%252BLas%2BVegas%252BCalifornia%252BNYC.png
These two are the best of us?
 
Bubba,
Another reasons Biden almost certainly had no clips.

You wear clips to improve speed and/or endurance via improved energy transfer between your legs and the bicycle. On a standard bicycle with pedals, you transfer energy solely by pushing down on the pedal, left leg, right leg, left leg. You get nothing on the upstroke. On a bicycle with cleats and clips, your foot is in a shoe that is attached at the ball of your foot to the bicycle and will not come loose until you make a specific movement that releases the clip from the cleat. My clips require me to move my heel outward/toes inward to release the shoe. This attachment allows the cyclist to take advantage of using both the downstroke and upstroke of the legs to propel the bicycle. It is not a set-up meant for 79 year old, half senile men who are out for a casual photo op ride.

You can certainly tell a specialty cycling shoe with clips from a regular old tennis shoe.
spdcleatpedal.jpg
 
Upon further review of the video, Biden had toe cages. Much easier to get your foot out of, but much worse in terms of energy transfer. Whoever put him on a bike with toe cages should be fired on the spot.
shoe-toe-cage-768x571.jpg
 
Those are a pain. Much worse than clips, although for some reason those shimanos are called clipliss - darn I can’t remember the correct spelling.
 
Bubba,
Another reasons Biden almost certainly had no clips.

You wear clips to improve speed and/or endurance via improved energy transfer between your legs and the bicycle. On a standard bicycle with pedals, you transfer energy solely by pushing down on the pedal, left leg, right leg, left leg. You get nothing on the upstroke. On a bicycle with cleats and clips, your foot is in a shoe that is attached at the ball of your foot to the bicycle and will not come loose until you make a specific movement that releases the clip from the cleat. My clips require me to move my heel outward/toes inward to release the shoe. This attachment allows the cyclist to take advantage of using both the downstroke and upstroke of the legs to propel the bicycle. It is not a set-up meant for 79 year old, half senile men who are out for a casual photo op ride.

You can certainly tell a specialty cycling shoe with clips from a regular old tennis shoe.
spdcleatpedal.jpg
I was offering up what the left wing twitterverse was saying. That’s all.
 
Bubba,
Another reasons Biden almost certainly had no clips.

You wear clips to improve speed and/or endurance via improved energy transfer between your legs and the bicycle. On a standard bicycle with pedals, you transfer energy solely by pushing down on the pedal, left leg, right leg, left leg. You get nothing on the upstroke. On a bicycle with cleats and clips, your foot is in a shoe that is attached at the ball of your foot to the bicycle and will not come loose until you make a specific movement that releases the clip from the cleat. My clips require me to move my heel outward/toes inward to release the shoe. This attachment allows the cyclist to take advantage of using both the downstroke and upstroke of the legs to propel the bicycle. It is not a set-up meant for 79 year old, half senile men who are out for a casual photo op ride.

You can certainly tell a specialty cycling shoe with clips from a regular old tennis shoe.
spdcleatpedal.jpg

I haven't ridden since 2004 (too dangerous in dfw) , but your cleats look a lot better than my old ones. I had Time shoes and pedals. Those cleats were beefy, but easy to get off the bike
 
No more worries, Joe is dropping fed gas tax for the summer, lowering the price of elect vehicles, increasing production of gasoline at refineries, having gas stations lower the price at their pumps, and putting in more solar panels and windmills. It’s all good.
 
If the average tank is 15 gallons and a person fills up once a week, he will be putting $2.70 in your pocket each week. Or $1 million if you live 370,370 years more. Thanks Joe!
 
If the average tank is 15 gallons and a person fills up once a week, he will be putting $2.70 in your pocket each week. Or $1 million if you live 370,370 years more. Thanks Joe!
Put more bluntly, he is seeking to buy votes for less than $50 per vehicle given the presumption of the average driver filling up once a week across the next three months.

He has ZERO reply for how the gap in highway infrastructure funds will be filled which come directly FROM the federal gas taxes.
 
Your gas will be $0.12 per gallon cheaper, for which you will suffer with roads so full of unrepaired potholes, your vehicle will inevitably need a new suspension at a nice $2k price point.
 
Suspending the gas tax is a dumb idea mainly just because it doesn't deal with the underlying problem. An excessive gas tax isn't why fuel costs are too high. In fact, the argument can be made that the gas tax is too low.
 
Suspending the gas tax is a dumb idea mainly just because it doesn't deal with the underlying problem. An excessive gas tax isn't why fuel costs are too high. In fact, the argument can be made that the gas tax is too low.
I think the real goal of dropping the tax and getting some states to do the same is to avoid the next three months of this headline.....

"Gas hit an ALL TIME high at the pump AGAIN this week"

Imagine that headline every other week throughout the summer. The Dem's and Brandon would drop another 4-5pts in the general Rep/Dem matchup. It's all about the optics.
 
The gas tax will accomplish exactly what Biden's puppet masters want. It will increase demand without increasing oil supply. Long-term this will cause gasoline prices to go up which is what the climate change fascists want.
 
Question for oil and gas people
We were energy independent when Biden took over
If he had made no changes to our policies and regulations
Where would we be now against Putin invading etc?
 
Question for oil and gas people
We were energy independent when Biden took over
If he had made no changes to our policies and regulations
Where would we be now against Putin invading etc?
No, the US consumes roughly 20MMbpd of oil. In late 2019, we peaked at 13MMbpd of production. Furthermore, we export a lot of our crude because most of our refineries were not designed for the light crudes that comes from most US shale reservoirs.

Short-Term Energy Outlook - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
 
So we export the light stuff and import the heavy weight?
And now we are importing more than we are exporting?
 
So we export the light stuff and import the heavy weight?
And now we are importing more than we are exporting?
Correct on the first part. According to the EIA graph, we are currently exporting more than we import.

Never mind - I realize that I don't understand their graph.
 
Last edited:
OK, ChE. Without going into a graduate level lecture, can you please tell me the differences between light crude and heavy crude? Sour and sweet? And why do these differences make it more economically feasible to export light crude rather than retooling or adding on to our existing refineries to process it?
 
OK, ChE. Without going into a graduate level lecture, can you please tell me the differences between light crude and heavy crude? Sour and sweet? And why do these differences make it more economically feasible to export light crude rather than retooling or adding on to our existing refineries to process it?
I actually work in Upstream but understand enough about Downstream to be dangerous. Light and heavy refer to the density or API of the crude (light is low density, heavy is high density). From a high level, heavier crudes have higher molecular weight, low volatility components that end in bottom of the crude unit, vacuum distillation, etc. The lighter crudes have a large percentage of lighter components that end up choking the overhead of the crude unit. If your plant is not designed for the lighter crudes, you will hit a plant "bottleneck" or limit quicker and therefore make less liquids.

Sour just refers to sulfur content. Most refineries use hydrotreaters to convert organic sulfur components to H2S (which is removed using amines and Claus process). This allows for high sulfur crudes to be meet tight sulfur specs while increasing liquid yields.

So different types of crudes have different blends of molecules that go to different parts of the plant. That's an over-simplistic explanation but you get the point.
 
I'm getting the idea that treating different classes of crude requires a lot more than retooling one production line at a refinery.

Still, seems to me we should have a more robust refinery capacity in the USA to handle the primary type of crude produced here.

EDIT: Thank you for taking the time to provide the explanation.
 

Weekly Prediction Contest

* Predict HORNS-AGGIES *
Sat, Nov 30 • 6:30 PM on ABC

Recent Threads

Back
Top